AyeDubbleYoo Posted July 25, 2011 Share Posted July 25, 2011 Blimey the last page consisted of : anything positive said by a journo means he is paid by the club and it cannot surely be true, anything bad about the club is to be believed and the journo has finally found some balls. Amazing how cynical fat ashley has made us, what a state of affairs he has brought to this club. There has been cynicism around for a few years now, the previous owners were hardly whiter than white. But I agree, we are reaching new heights these days. It gets stupid at times. I just wish people would sometimes recognise the other side. Even the relegation we bounced back from well, and the Hughton sacking turned out not to harm us. The Carroll sale is a blow, but the money was clearly too good to turn down. Anyway, this isn't the thread for that discussion really, but it's a shame every debate just comes down to whether you hate or sympathise with Mike Ashley. Hopefully it will die down when the season starts. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skirge Posted July 25, 2011 Share Posted July 25, 2011 Its as though he is on just over the clubs wage cap and they are willing to allow to stay on that wage.. if that is the case then why not just say that instead of what Pards has said. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
colinmk Posted July 25, 2011 Share Posted July 25, 2011 The funny thing is I have never seen Enrique quoted before he said this last night regarding his contract negotiations. Everything has come from the club and if what Jose has said is true then they have been lying about his contract negotiations in particular. No wonder he's pissed off. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minhosa Posted July 25, 2011 Share Posted July 25, 2011 Don't think anyone can judge the harm the Hughton sacking has done (or otherwise) until this season tbh. The spirit of the squad in the first half of last season went a long way to keeping us up. That is where Prdew will have his work cut out for him and one reason I feel we may struggle. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted July 25, 2011 Share Posted July 25, 2011 We have offered him the best contract that has been offered to anyone here for a long while and we cannot do any more, really. Obviously if someone comes in before the window closes, with a year left, it would be difficult for us. As a manager, of course I want him to stay. The worst thing for us would be if he went late, thats the problem. We are trying to do some business because we need to cover ourselves in that area between now and the end of the window regardless of Enríque. How much is Enrique reportedly on? I've seen between 40k and 47k which makes you wonder what the lesser contracts have cost the club if Enrique has been offered the same as his last contract which is the best. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lotus Posted July 25, 2011 Share Posted July 25, 2011 Blimey the last page consisted of : anything positive said by a journo means he is paid by the club and it cannot surely be true, anything bad about the club is to be believed and the journo has finally found some balls. Amazing how cynical fat ashley has made us, what a state of affairs he has brought to this club. There has been cynicism around for a few years now, the previous owners were hardly whiter than white. But I agree, we are reaching new heights these days. It gets stupid at times. I just wish people would sometimes recognise the other side. Even the relegation we bounced back from well, and the Hughton sacking turned out not to harm us. The Carroll sale is a blow, but the money was clearly too good to turn down. Anyway, this isn't the thread for that discussion really, but it's a shame every debate just comes down to whether you hate or sympathise with Mike Ashley. Hopefully it will die down when the season starts. 2 points about the Carroll sale make me uneasy. First, they'd been touting him about so it wasn't like they didn't have time to get a replacement. They just didn't get one. Now, that can happen, no doubt about that so then we turn to the summer. I know it's not over yet but SO FAR Carroll has been replaced by Ba, i'm sure the wages are like for like, Nolan out and Cabaye in, fee more or less covers itself and same with wages so our only real outlay has been Marveaux. No fee to a club, just the wages and the signing on fee (as expected). Ba, Cabaye and Marveaux MIGHT turn out to be good players but there is no way a club with plenty in the bank is BETTER OFF not spending money. If picking up a couple of good freebies was all it took every club would be doing it. Players have fees because a certain level of expectancy comes with them, the more they cost the more they are expected to achieve. Obvious to us all, i'm sure. Newcastle have some areas of the squad that could do with some attention. If the club had some sporting ambition it would choose to use it's MASSIVE transfer surplus to address this. Nothing wrong with a couple of freebies with some promise but not having another striker, right winger, right back, back up CB and cover for middle is lacking sporting ambition. Maybe Erding will be good, if he signs that will be money well spent, that's what it's for. What about the rest? Squad needs investment. Club has funds. Ergo, use it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BlacknWhiteArmy Posted July 25, 2011 Share Posted July 25, 2011 We still in for M'Bengue? I remember at a time his price was considered too high (£5m + ). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted July 25, 2011 Share Posted July 25, 2011 Don't think anyone can judge the harm the Hughton sacking has done (or otherwise) until this season tbh. The spirit of the squad in the first half of last season went a long way to keeping us up. That is where Prdew will have his work cut out for him and one reason I feel we may struggle. Fair point, he's done well so far (IMO) but you're right he has only been in the job a short time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan_Taylor Posted July 25, 2011 Share Posted July 25, 2011 Blimey the last page consisted of : anything positive said by a journo means he is paid by the club and it cannot surely be true, anything bad about the club is to be believed and the journo has finally found some balls. Amazing how cynical fat ashley has made us, what a state of affairs he has brought to this club. There has been cynicism around for a few years now, the previous owners were hardly whiter than white. But I agree, we are reaching new heights these days. It gets stupid at times. I just wish people would sometimes recognise the other side. Even the relegation we bounced back from well, and the Hughton sacking turned out not to harm us. The Carroll sale is a blow, but the money was clearly too good to turn down. Anyway, this isn't the thread for that discussion really, but it's a shame every debate just comes down to whether you hate or sympathise with Mike Ashley. Hopefully it will die down when the season starts. 2 points about the Carroll sale make me uneasy. First, they'd been touting him about so it wasn't like they didn't have time to get a replacement. They just didn't get one. Now, that can happen, no doubt about that so then we turn to the summer. I know it's not over yet but SO FAR Carroll has been replaced by Ba, i'm sure the wages are like for like, Nolan out and Cabaye in, fee more or less covers itself and same with wages so our only real outlay has been Marveaux. No fee to a club, just the wages and the signing on fee (as expected). Ba, Cabaye and Marveaux MIGHT turn out to be good players but there is no way a club with plenty in the bank is BETTER OFF not spending money. If picking up a couple of good freebies was all it took every club would be doing it. Players have fees because a certain level of expectancy comes with them, the more they cost the more they are expected to achieve. Obvious to us all, i'm sure. Newcastle have some areas of the squad that could do with some attention. If the club had some sporting ambition it would choose to use it's MASSIVE transfer surplus to address this. Nothing wrong with a couple of freebies with some promise but not having another striker, right winger, right back, back up CB and cover for middle is lacking sporting ambition. Maybe Erding will be good, if he signs that will be money well spent, that's what it's for. What about the rest? Squad needs investment. Club has funds. Ergo, use it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tmonkey Posted July 25, 2011 Share Posted July 25, 2011 My money is on the club rejecting a few cheapo bids for Enrique which has pissed him off, hence the outburst being an attempt to force the sale. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wallace Posted July 25, 2011 Share Posted July 25, 2011 The thing is everyone knows Ennrique wants to go so other clubs are going to wait in the hope of getting a better deal for themselves. If the buying club waits until 31st August before acting, what will happen about getting a replacement - will they say they didn't have time when they have known for 7-8 months that he wanted to leave. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicken Dancer Posted July 25, 2011 Share Posted July 25, 2011 Will someone explain what the Golfmag posts were? Relitavely new to the forum. Thanks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeloEmre Posted July 25, 2011 Share Posted July 25, 2011 Will someone explain what the Golfmag posts were? Relitavely new to the forum. Thanks. Go to his profil and check his previous posts. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted July 25, 2011 Share Posted July 25, 2011 It wasn't Douglas to be fair. It was Steve Brenner from the Sun. Douglas was just relaying the info from him. Personally, I wouldn't believe any of the s*** he (Brenner) spouts. He's an antagonistic, spurs supporting, cockney c***, who just happens to be the Sun's NE journo. My mates had the unfortunate pleasure of meeting him too. Bellend in real life as well. Utter bollocks. But he is a Cockney/Spurs supporter, so at least you got that right Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Venkman Posted July 25, 2011 Share Posted July 25, 2011 which bit? that he's antagonistic, a bell end, or the sun's NE journo? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest johnson293 Posted July 25, 2011 Share Posted July 25, 2011 Blimey the last page consisted of : anything positive said by a journo means he is paid by the club and it cannot surely be true, anything bad about the club is to be believed and the journo has finally found some balls. Amazing how cynical fat ashley has made us, what a state of affairs he has brought to this club. Look how Luke Edwards' journalism has changed since he joined the Telegraph. Also consider how outspoken Caulkin, and especially Bird and McNally are compared to the majority of the regional journalists. Edwards' latest Blog is interesting... http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/sport/lukeedwards/100017958/jose-enrique-wants-whats-best-for-him-not-newcastle-united/ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
toon25 Posted July 25, 2011 Share Posted July 25, 2011 Will someone explain what the Golfmag posts were? Relitavely new to the forum. Thanks. Suggested that Pardew's contract stipulated that, amongst his managerial responsibilities, his remit was also to 'reduce costs'. Folk have taken it to mean a variety of things depending on their agenda. Note: Golfmag had apparently been involved in drawing up Pardew's contract and had called his appointment about 2/3 weeks before Hughton was given the boot. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ujpest doza Posted July 25, 2011 Share Posted July 25, 2011 Blimey the last page consisted of : anything positive said by a journo means he is paid by the club and it cannot surely be true, anything bad about the club is to be believed and the journo has finally found some balls. Amazing how cynical fat ashley has made us, what a state of affairs he has brought to this club. Look how Luke Edwards' journalism has changed since he joined the Telegraph. Also consider how outspoken Caulkin, and especially Bird and McNally are compared to the majority of the regional journalists. Edwards' latest Blog is interesting... http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/sport/lukeedwards/100017958/jose-enrique-wants-whats-best-for-him-not-newcastle-united/ That's spot on that mind. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted July 25, 2011 Share Posted July 25, 2011 I agree with that blog like, obviously Enrique is thinking of himself first. That's fine for him, but it's sad to see so many fans rallying behind him, when really he is being disrespectful to the club and our new signings. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Wally_McFool Posted July 25, 2011 Share Posted July 25, 2011 I agree with that blog like, obviously Enrique is thinking of himself first. That's fine for him, but it's sad to see so many fans rallying behind him, when really he is being disrespectful to the club and our new signings. In your opinion of course! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted July 25, 2011 Share Posted July 25, 2011 I agree with that blog like, obviously Enrique is thinking of himself first. That's fine for him, but it's sad to see so many fans rallying behind him, when really he is being disrespectful to the club and our new signings. In your opinion of course! Er, yes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
olliemort Posted July 25, 2011 Share Posted July 25, 2011 The owners are proven liars so I know which side I would believe Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest michaelfoster Posted July 25, 2011 Share Posted July 25, 2011 Blimey the last page consisted of : anything positive said by a journo means he is paid by the club and it cannot surely be true, anything bad about the club is to be believed and the journo has finally found some balls. Amazing how cynical fat ashley has made us, what a state of affairs he has brought to this club. Spot on article that, Ashley is a lyer but Enrique has been very unprofessional Look how Luke Edwards' journalism has changed since he joined the Telegraph. Also consider how outspoken Caulkin, and especially Bird and McNally are compared to the majority of the regional journalists. Edwards' latest Blog is interesting... http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/sport/lukeedwards/100017958/jose-enrique-wants-whats-best-for-him-not-newcastle-united/ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colocho Posted July 25, 2011 Share Posted July 25, 2011 The owners are proven liars so I know which side I would believe This and their track record. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Antec Posted July 25, 2011 Share Posted July 25, 2011 Will someone explain what the Golfmag posts were? Relitavely new to the forum. Thanks. Don't read if easily depressed Part of Pardew's remuneration is based on how much the club's operating expenses (wge costs for him) are reduced. I think that this fact will influence much of this summer's decisions - ones that seem logical to us and ones that don't. A very specific part of Pardew's written remit is to reduce costs and the debt, to make it easier for MA to sell the club. Look at everything he says in this context.. In all of this guys, don't forget (I almost had) that our info was that Pardew was given the very specific responsibility of reducing the wage bill as a condition of his employment, as MA feels that a lower cost base will now make the club easier to sell. Quote from: TrueToon on December 08, 2010, 11:19:20 AM David Craig reckons there is more than one man in the running and that nothing has been signed yet, Although he isn't saying Pardew won't eventually be appointed but it looks like we might have to wait til Friday time to find out either way... That is a deliberate ploy from the club to make us think there wasn't a pre-determined plan. Fact. I really don't warrant this notority. It is a complete fluke that I have direct and first hand knowledge of this. Just to try and show you that I am not making all this up for self-serving reasons, you might remember some other stuff i posted on here a few years ago. Firstly, because I got to be close friends with the late Trevor Bennett who was the nicest man I have ever met and actually bankrolled Sir John Hall's acquision of the NUFC shares. The stuff I witnessed in the Boardroom and the Trevor Bennett Suite during that period and all involving Shepherd still make me very depressed. The second load of stuff was when I met Tony Jiminez a few times. That was right at the time of the Jonas, Colo and Xisco purchases, including that awful night at the Forest of Arden hotel after the Coventry cup game. And now this. All these relationships have come about through business but are all flukes, they could happen to anyone. I am just spouting all this because I know what it's like to be fed information and not know whether it's true or not. We all deserve better than that given our support of this bloody club and by giving you a bit of background, hopefully you will realise that I am trying to feed through accurate info that I have been given, without blowing everyone's cover. When I first found this out, it was when Chris and the team were riding a wave, back in October I think. Pardew's name had bever been mentioned anywhere to my knowledge and I flat didn't believe what I was being told. I, like all of us, am still clinging to the hope that Ashley has had his head turned by Jol's sudden availability. But I do know for a fact that the plan in question has been in place for a long time. Quote from: TheGuv on December 06, 2010, 09:09:36 PM Quote from: Golfmag on December 06, 2010, 09:08:12 PM Quote from: Taylor27 on December 06, 2010, 09:02:19 PM How about Pardew just being a false name in case there was a leak? Maybe. Certainly hope so. But doubt it because I was told from the same source that CH would go this afternoon and that wasn't a false trail. Why didn't you post it when you knew then? I did. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now