Jump to content

José Enrique


eliassenfredrik

Recommended Posts

I'd say Tiote's our most important player. I think Jose's the most technically gifted plus he's still got so many years ahead of him.

 

Jury's still out, to some degree, on HBA. Anything less than double-figures for Jose would be a disappointment.

 

You haven't got the first clue what he earns, btw.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd say Tiote's our most important player. I think Jose's the most technically gifted plus he's still got so many years ahead of him.

 

 

 

Tiote and Barton are our most important players. Since Tiote's debut, we've not won one single game with him and Barton injured/suspended. Also LB is by default a less vulnerable position that DM.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd say Tiote's our most important player. I think Jose's the most technically gifted plus he's still got so many years ahead of him.

 

 

 

Tiote and Barton are our most important players. Since Tiote's debut, we've not won one single game with him and Barton injured/suspended. Also LB is by default a less vulnerable position that DM.

 

Chelsea 4-3 in League cup? If you count this... Was only in that match last few minutes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

PL-games, forgot to mention that..

 

.

60k my ass

 

No, you can kiss my ass..   :coolsmiley:

 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1187448/Meltdown-Newcastle-8217-s-71m-wage-nightmare--stay.html

 

And I quote:

 

" HARD TO SHIFT:

 

JOEY BARTON £60,000 — who would be mad enough to buy him?

 

JOSE ENRIQUE £60,000 — cost £6m, which was £6m too much.

 

FABRICIO COLOCCINI £60,000 — he was frighteningly bad.

 

XISCO £50,000 — an expensive flop."

 

Have read a couple of other articles too that state he earns that amount. But there are some that mention £50 000. So he's probably on around 50-60 a year..

Link to post
Share on other sites

I love out of the 4 players they've highlighted as the worst and who'd be hard to shift, 3 have gone on to be easily our best players from that list. I also think I can remember reading an article at the back end of last season where the Mail had tipped us to go down another division at the start of it. :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not likely, first of all, Enrique signed the same year as Barton, which puts both under the same "salary regime"= hurling money out the window. Second, Enrique was very sought after when we bought him. The newspapers were stunned that he actually signed for us, because  other successful clubs were after him. That leads me to conclude that he signed because we offered him more money than any other clubs involved.

 

But I don't think the main obstacle for Enrique. He wants the club to match his ambitions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not likely, first of all, Enrique signed the same year as Barton, which puts both under the same "salary regime"= hurling money out the window. Second, Enrique was very sought after when we bought him. The newspapers were stunned that he actually signed for us, because  other successful clubs were after him. That leads me to conclude that he signed because we offered him more money than any other clubs involved.

 

But I don't think the main obstacle for Enrique. He wants the club to match his ambitions.

 

Barton was already on 40k plus a week at Man City, Enrique was on peanuts in Spain. There is no way he is earning anything like Barton, ffs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...