midds

The Spurs one looks smart as. The Stoke one is awful.

Blackpool. We need one of the relegation places sewn up and they fit the bill quite nicely.

Gerrard to Chelsea Torres to City

Always seemed to give 100% but that was rarely good enough. Probably a decent lad but he's a dreadful footballer. I've got no problem with peple getting all misty-eyed about former players but I've got to draw the line at Ramage.

Sort of.

Are Sunderland still popular in Ireland or has the novelty worn off yet?

Mark Bright. Was he named sarcastically? Once taught a kid called Daniel Braines. Was the most sarcastically named person in the world. He was thick as a fucking boot.

Bad craic about that oil slick like isn't it? Reckon it's going to affect loads of wildlife.

I don't bet at all, but even if I did I wouldn't touch Serie A with a bargepoll. Notoriously 'peculiar' results on the last few rounds of matches.

Wouldn't give a bucket of piss for Merson's opinion tbh.

The only thing that could possibly balance out having Best and Ameobi leading the line for us is them starting fucking Ramage. I'm going to stick my neck out here and say this isn't going to be pretty...

hes bored probably nothing to do really with season over He's got the most important 3 months of his life coming up as far as I'm concerned. He's got to find us 5 players (minimum) who are going to keep us up and his reputation as a manager will be decided on how he does. He hasn't got time to chit-chat with the shithouses in the press.

One of the most refrehing things about this season is the lack of media 'exclusives' and 'relevations' from the boss and Ashley. They've let the football do the talking and have played everything with a flat bat - for which they both deserve credit. Not sure why Hughton is suddenly giving the rags the time of day now tbh.

The away kit is the one they are wearing for the FA Cup final, the home one will never be worn. You mean the one they've already worn for the semi-final?

5-5. Routledge (3), Williamson and Sherla

You fucking beauties.

118th.

That'll do.

height=400 width=300http://www.sporting-heroes.net/files_football/SPEEDIE_David_1984_GH_R.jpg[/img] Horrible little wanker. In fact, to my embarrassment, I was dragged along by red and white mates to a mackem game and was stood about 10 yards from this incident: Apparently Bennett ran off quickly and waited for Speedie in the tunnel and had another go at him. Speedie got dogs abuse for the whole time he was on the park.

Think Birmingham paid to loan him, so they have a right to keep him if they choose. and like city need the money. for how much they got it would have been insurance in case of this. to leave yourselves with only 2 keepers in their position (financially and going for a champs league spot) is pretty stupid. Like I asked earlier, is it good for the game for clubs to have three decent keepers at the top club with one having no chance of playing? As that is what would happen without the insurance. Nielsen sounds like our Caig, there so we can play a reserve game. The rules are there unopposed by the Premier League clubs. As pointed out by NUT and myself other clubs have used it in the past, and will do so again. No-one is disputing the fact that other clubs have used the rule in the past. It's more the fact that if they have several keepers to pick from it's not that much of an emergency. If they had NO keepers then obviously they should be allowed to bring someone in. It's the fact they don't want to play any of the keepers they do have available.

Not surprised, but there you go. Not a biggie really but they've got away with one there.

Getting an emergency keeper in shouldn't be necessary. They've got a keeper - play him. You play the cards you're dealt. I'd imagine Spurs and Villa will have plenty to say if they're allowed to sign another keeper at this point in the season with 4th place up for grabs. I know it's happened in the past but when these 3 are going for the Champions League then there will be hell on it the PL allow it.

Bert Kassie will know.

4-1