madras

When we have a player with this sort of capability on this sort of deal it's worrying. Yes they (Dortmund) have to go along with the deal but is the players deal set up and agreed ?

I bet if they do have a forum it'll be something really dull like Saints forum or Southampton onli............oops!

I've a feeling he may come in for Clarke at the weekend.

Which official outlet has said she's in talks to buy us ? Seemed suspicous that NDA's had apparently been signed but not with her. The Times amongst others have said that she’s held informal talks with us. This thread is full of such information from multiple respectable sources. Informal talks has become preliminary talks ? ands when I asked about official I meant the club or her .

Which official outlet has said she's in talks to buy us ? Seemed suspicous that NDA's had apparently been signed but not with her.

This sort of stuff always happens on the training pitch. The worry is it deliberately being made public seemingly to scapeegoat Diame.

He's well out of order for slapping. This is the North East, slaps are for girls.

Where? Well along the ticker (non-breaking news one). The Sun (for however believable they maybe) are also saying she was there for the Stoke game as well. They are also saying Spurs are 1 of the other clubs she’s interested in, though with their recent league positioning, playing squad, and new stadium you would imagine that they would cost considerably more than us. You don't say!

If it keeps happening I agree, but in this one game in isolation it's understandable imo. He played a slightly different role with a different partner so it's understandable it wasn't a completely seamless transition. He played deeper aswell. Not sure if it was because of playing alongside Shelvey or due to the opposition.

I think if something was likely she wouldn't have watched the game from the stands.

Consortia shurely ?

In his first few games for us he looked the real deal aswell. So reminiscent of Sissoko.

Doesn't rate him could be a tad harsh. Maybe doesn't trust his ability to be available for enough games.

Seriously ? He was left stretching a few times because they had more pace than us and pressured high. And Huddersfield was his worst game.

Oh come on, he's nothing on the ball, off the ball he's no Dave McReery, I mean he gives little defensively or ging forward.

Said it a few times, really don't see what he brings to the party.

I don't remember all this furore back in the 50's. 60's. 70's etc about it and that was a lot closer to the wars they are mostly associated with. Oh aye maybe it's all to do with image, provocation and faux outrage.

I thought they were switching a fair bit. Not like taking it in turns but when one was in a better position to come short the other went a bit more advanced.

Should've been Gayle for Perez

So did I. I was in Ambleside for the home game and watched the away in The Bridge.

The scary thing is, I think he's being serious. The first reply nails it though.

Aye. I reckon Gayle might come in today like. Just a sneaking suspicion. Rafa knows he can do it against these and it mightn't be the game plan they expect us to go in with. Not sure about that like. One of the reasons for our recent form, for me like, is that we can play a different way with Joselu as opposed to Gayle, add in Merino and they are far more suited to the way Rafa wants to play.

i've been trying to understand this thinking that the debts were all Short's. If so administration would be pointless (tax maybe ??). Is there any possiblty he's been passing the debt off? I know he he'd passed some off, a small bit, a year or two back.

Use betfair, lump on. I'm laying them by the way, the more money you put on is better for me.

He was, except at the start when they put loads down his side and he pointed and shouted a lot when it was him out of position,( wouldn't want to put a young full back in behind him). With the current squad, the idea of playing him as a no.10 doee appeal but who knows ?