Dokko

It's his room mates cousin. Yeah, you're all sad bastards. Better than being a wannabe know-it-all gobshite.

It's his room mates cousin.

................................Harper Simpson......Williamson....Collocini......Kadar .............................Butt Guthrie......Smith...........Nolan..........Hertz Van Rental ..........................Carroll........

This not on the box?

Oh we have no money, but we have no debt, thats real wealth in todays football world! Your finance director said that you were £7m in debt in December. What's happened since then to correct that? He has an interesting accounting style, for instance the sale of Robinson to Bolton £2.1 million and Greening to Fulham £5 million, will not show on this years acounts, he defers payment for tax reasons, this is an annual event for us, Cuntis Davis to Villa being another example,all loan deals which are permenant at the end of the season, no get out. Us fans hate his prudence but it probably means we are always going to exist, abeit in some sort of footballing twilight zone between Championship and Premiership. Aye, all my Bolton supporter friends are delighted with the Robinson transfer de-ligh-ted £2.1 million for an average 30 year old fullback with dodgy knees (bits missing from birth), told you our chairman is a financial wizard! Aye but Ashley managed to get £500k for a half a season loan for Shola Ameobi.

Very homo

Is this an Millionaire version of pass the parcel? Or in this case Pass the Pompy.

Pompey taken over again Chainrai seizes control from Al-Faraj Sky Sports News understands that Portsmouth have been taken over for a fourth time this season after Balram Chainrai seized control. Chainrai has taken over the 90 per cent shareholding in Pompey that was held by Ali Al-Faraj after the club continually defaulted on loan repayments. The Hong Kong businessman had loaned at least £17m to Faraj to keep Portsmouth afloat through Portpin, the company he owns with his Israeli business partner, Levi Kushnir, and their associates. Those loans were secured against the stadium, the club's future television revenue and Faraj's 90 per cent share. Angered by Portsmouth's failure to make the repayments, despite Portpin continually extending the deadlines, Chainrai's patience ran out on Wednesday. Under the terms of the loan Faraj's 90 per cent shareholding in Portsmouth was frozen and passes to Chainrai, who has confirmed Portpin will now look after the club's best interests. "Portpin have made substantial loans to Portsmouth to try and ensure the club's future," he told The Guardian. "Portpin will [now] continue to work for the best interests of the club." Portsmouth are due in court to appeal against the petition before the hearing next Wednesday. Chainrai appealed to HMRC to understand the club's financial predicament, adding: "To help Portsmouth succeed we need the support and understanding of Her Majesty's Revenue to work out a solution."

Cool a WBA fan, hope you're a decent one, were collecting them (decent other fans) BTW i think Barnes is an excellent player, injuries have ruined him though, question is can he put them behind him and continue a career which started so promising.

Dawson doing well. Had a good season hasn't he?

The arseholes fart back.

Dicks beating the arseholes 1-0

No but there are clubs in the shit more than them and they'll survive, just.

I had very high hopes for him but his quality didn't suit the prem. IT suits the CCC.

They made him pay as well.

Clark comes across a bit thick, i do believe there's a limit to his ability as a manager. Still, a better option than Shearer, certainly proven a lot more managerial wise.

Fuking hell, Jordan's had more cock than that.

Why? Surely you should be asking questions about her, her lifestyle and choices; it's not like cancer took her. (unless im getting what you mean wrong)

At least he could have been humiliated here in front of a big crowd.

Keane: "I'm gone to win der leeg, to be sure to be sure"

Possibly.

I think it's ridiculous how much Hughton's tactics are being criticised tbh. I laughed at the naivety of it before, but it really does seem like a lot of people think it's as simple as putting (what they think is) the best 11 players on the pitch at the same time all the time. This gives absolutely no consideration to the fact that the manager has far more information about the players to go on than we do. He sees how they perform in training, no doubt trying different formations, he gets fitness reports on them, he should even give consideration to their mental state and what's going on in their personal life. He also has to try and balance playing the best team every week with rotating things to make sure the same players don't wear themselves out over a long season and that fringe players are not frozen out. We've got 5 games in 16 days coming up next, but I guess that won't come into the equation when people convince themselves the 11 players they put in a formation on a message board would have played beautiful flowing football and won every game 4-0. The fact is Hughton has very limited options to change things in any significant way as the players we have are limited in their ability. We've been very limited in terms of numbers in wide players, and in central midfield they are all much of a muchness except that Nolan has a knack of scoring goals. The players are good enough to get results in this league in the style we've been playing, but no way in the world is it going to be pretty no matter who plays or how they line up, and if we did try to change it there's absolutely no guarantee that "better" football would even maintain the same level of results let alone improve them. Here's some of my favourites from the crap that comes out: "He'll never drop Butt" changed immediately to "he'll never drop Smith/Nolan" once he did in fact drop Butt. I'm not sure who exactly is supposed to play in midfield once we drop Butt, Nolan and Smith. Guthrie and Vuckic I suppose, even though Guthrie's been equally poor when played central and hardly anyone's seen anything of Vuckic so he obviously "must be better". Lovenkrands dad died and because soon after he played one game and scored, that's all gone away and he should be playing week in week out again without a care in the world. "Why didn't he play <insert recently or even currently injured player>?" which of course would turn into "Why did he play <insert previously injured player> rushing him back too soon?" if any player who's been injured in the last month gets injured again. "When player X came on he changed the game". Of course this is used not as a compliment of a good substitution that a player was saved to be fresh coming on against a tired defence/midfield, but as a criticism that the player should have played from the start (where he may well have been far less effective pacing himself for a full game and up against a fresh defence). I swear even if Wenger or Ferguson were manager half of you would be criticising their tactics week in week out. I understand what you are saying but football is a game of opinions, and forums are a place to voice your opinion, so get used to hearing this shit on a football forum.

Wayne?

Outside an exploding MSpaint on windows 3.0 factory? FYP FYPWFHP