Jump to content

James

Member
  • Posts

    21,950
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by James

  1. How many years have we been saying that now? The scary thing is James said the other week Shola is one of the best in training. I never said anything of the sort!
  2. You can say similar about Michael Owen but people can argue that they don't want him in for the sake of the improvement of the rest of the team. I'd say the same applies for Jonas and Martins right now. Lovenkrands has put Martins out of the picture for now IMO.
  3. Raylor isn't out of position, Bruce said that he wanted to come her so he could play in this position. So one player out of position would be two out of position if you swapped Saylor for Jonas, as Jonas isn't much cop on the right. That position was right back Nah, it was pretty much on the right hand side. And as for the first time this season there was some threat from the right hand side, I'm inclined to keep him there.
  4. Raylor isn't out of position, Bruce said that he wanted to come her so he could play in this position. So one player out of position would be two out of position if you swapped Saylor for Jonas, as Jonas isn't much cop on the right.
  5. You sound like Sam Allardyce's illegitimate and slightly retarded son. No offence meant by the way. Sadly I don't want to see us play in this way, but in the relegation threatened managerless state we are currently in, it is probably the only way we can do it if we want some results. Terrible team playing terrible football getting results is better than nothing.
  6. Thing is with this system is that we are having to play direct due to a lack of a central midfield, we've got Shola up there whose task will be to go for the first ball, and when that fails, you need players around the box to collect the second balls, and Duff, Nolan, Lovenkrands and Raylor are the best for that job. Jonas is much too deep as he likes to build from the back, and Martins needs frequent good passes.
  7. Lovenkrands probably plays better off a bruiser, and Duff will get into the box. It is a no brainer after the last performance.
  8. We were terrible last game, it's just West Brom were even worse. This is a terrible first XI. Pathetic. That is because we are terrible, but at least we got players in an around the box last game, which is what we really need. Martins andJonas are for carpet teams playing from the back that will try to dominate possession, but we can't play like that.
  9. I agree with giving this team. I liked the balance, and shoehorning Jonas or Martins in would disrupt the balance found in the last game. Now time will tell if the last game is a one off, or have we indeed found the balance.
  10. Krul is on the bench. I REALLY hope he isn't now So do I in a strangely perverted way.
  11. cant see him ever managing Man U I can't see him replacing Fergie, but I can see him replacing the sacked replacement for Fergie.
  12. http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/eng_prem/7902769.stm Going to be an item about this on Radio Five Live tonight. Not a very good article, it has to be said, in that it has failed to address explanations for such piracy.
  13. people are just fed up with the whole circus that evolves around him imo, his shit attitude and the fact his transfer and wages have made a real dent into our finances which has affected our ability to sign other players I haven't noticed a circus recently, he hasn't done anything to show a bad attitude, granted we've been dented financially, but that wasn't really anyone's fault, it is just one of those things.
  14. Wow, where has this sudden hatred boiled out from everyone. Come from nowhere, have I missed something?
  15. I dreamt about him last night. We beat Man Utd 1-0 and he scored
  16. Been told that Krul will be on the bench and that there is a rotation with Forster going on atmo.
  17. If they can spare it why not. Be nice to see some of the leagues players donate some too. A load of tv pundits have donated iirc.
  18. Because it would fuck up attendances of lower-league games.
  19. We'd agreed to sign him before he'd even travelled to Spain. I vaguely remember the co-owned thing, Danubio had 50%, Valencia had the other 50% iirc.
  20. They've not sold him they loaned him, I'm guessing he doesn't have a Spanish passport so they would count as a foreigner meaning he would have to play for the Valencia B side (Name escapes me) so they probably figured loaning him here would be good, money off the wage bill, chance to play. Why get him then? "money off the wage bill, chance to play" Exactly, why did Valencia get him if they wanted him off the wage bill at the earliest opportunity?
  21. They've not sold him they loaned him, I'm guessing he doesn't have a Spanish passport so they would count as a foreigner meaning he would have to play for the Valencia B side (Name escapes me) so they probably figured loaning him here would be good, money off the wage bill, chance to play. Why get him then?
×
×
  • Create New...