Zero

The most important game in this season, in the sense that, if we win this, seriously, we are in a good shout of finishing 4th. All our remaining fixtures are winnable except Man City, and if we have the momentum to make a great finishing run, we can do it. We really can.

.....fuck. Perch and Williamson against Suarez / Carroll would be disastrous.

I would say it's even better than his best at France in terms of overall contribution. Well done Arfa.

Now his transfer fee looks like a bargain, finally.

It is Krul who should let Williamson know he was coming out. If Williamson didn't hear it, he is doing the right thing to try to clear himself. It is Krul's fault.

While Morrison rlly fucked up

Height

Could be a red

Krul should shout out louder. Clearly wlli didn't receive krul's order and decide to clear it himself

Jonas playing brilliantly at centre.

Jesus fuxking Christ. Ben aaaaaarrrrfffffaaa!!!!!!!!!!!!

Onside I think

Fucking get in!

Perch at left back

it's not necessarily 4-4-2 My apologies.

FUCK. No 4-4-2 for away matches FFS.

I can't understand the logic between Perch getting the MOTM and Pardew would make changes involving Santon and Obertan.

Ronaldo was Brazil's mian driving force for them the last time they won the world cup. Even Rivaldo was more important to them than Ronnie. Ronaldinho is my favourite player ever to watch for entertainment value, but there's no way he was ever effective or consistent as Messi has been. He's defnitely the better player. You could argue that Edgar Davids was just as important to Barcelona as Ronaldinho was for turning Barcelona around. Still, Ronaldinho > Zidane. Different opinion here. Ronaldo and Rivaldo were the "clinical" players for Brazil in 2002, but it's Ronaldinho who carried out the game plan perfectly and push Brazil forward. Ronnie did lots of work before Ronaldo could score and without him Brazil would not advance to the final. I know this is not the majority but I did think Ronnie was brilliant at that World Cup.

Both Zidane and Ronaldinho have been the most dominant player in football during their peak era. They are unplayable at their best and has been the main driving force for their World Cup success. In that sense, Messi is really behind them in terms of overall achievement. Mind you C Ronaldo is the same, even more far behind. The point is, almost all the "greatest players" were all fucking awesome and simply unplayable, having their own weapons that almost no other else could replicate. Messi's flashy run and movement are definitely one of the strongest weapon in football history, but so as Ronaldinho's creative tricks and Beckanbauer's tactical vision. I cannot simply say Messi is the "best ever" because he is doing what the others can't do, since at the same time he couldn't do what other legends can do as well. For sure Messi has proven to be one of the greatest players by winning almost everything in club level, that he is among the same rank as the likes of Ronaldino, Zidane, Cruyff, Best, or even Platini. However, to say he is the "best ever", the best football player even produced in this world, he is still not convincing enough. In fact I would say he is still a long way to go to that point. World Cup is a must imo. The question is "is Messi better than Pele and Maradona?" but not "Is Messi the same level as Pele and Maradona?" and to suggest Messi is the former case, World Cup is a minimum requirement. Winning the next 2 would be more convincing.

Just to off topic, i think the general standard of football is declining.

I think what means "we make it hard for ourselves" is to let Williamson got exposed during counter attack. The Spurs goal just cannot get off from my head.

And Pardew reckons Cabaye as his MOTM. I don't think Cabaye would lose confidence for receiving this praise?

Saylor is decent, Williamson is s***. That a big difference. btw, LLB, you really sounds like we are a top4 team and playing s*** football that didn't utilize our players and as a result we are not in contention for the 4th spot. Am I getting it wrong? are you nuts? how did you get that impression. my point is, having saylor in the team is not going to change the style of our gameplay. Your main point is that we aren't playing our best and our result should be better by playing the style of football that Pardew didn't deploy. So can I assume that you believe we have a top4 squad and should be challenging for the Champions League?

Saylor is decent, Williamson is shit. That a big difference. btw, LLB, you really sounds like we are a top4 team and playing shit football that didn't utilize our players and as a result we are not in contention for the 4th spot. Am I getting it wrong?

The last thing u can criticize pardew us his record against the weaker teams. He is the best since Bobby.