Teasy

I'm sorry but :lol: Hazard can do it with both feet and has far more in his locker in terms of 'skill'. Far more skill than Ben Arfa? You're high as a kite mate. I agree more or less with Skirge's assessment with the caveat that, as others have said, Hazard has more movement in front of him at Chelsea than Ben Arfa has in front of him currently. Go watch some of his performances for Lille, his footwork is phenomenal and the speed at which he pulls of his step overs, chops, half scoop turns etc is incredible. I mean the technique where he whipped in a bouncing ball first time whilst on the run with a rabona last season was crazy, I don't think I've ever seen a better one. Ben Arfa doesn't seem that bothered about specific tricks (Torres probably does more), he just fly's past three and four players for fun regularly, in the Premier League (rather than Ligue 1). Seriously Hazard looks an exciting player and very well rounded, Ben Arfa's dribbling is about as good as it gets though.

I'm sorry but :lol: Hazard can do it with both feet and has far more in his locker in terms of 'skill'. Far more skill than Ben Arfa? You're high as a kite mate. I agree more or less with Skirge's assessment with the caveat that, as others have said, Hazard has more movement in front of him at Chelsea than Ben Arfa has in front of him currently.

Glad to see the lads got some sense. Fulham are no bigger a club than Crystal Palace.

I'd take Johnson as a backup winger on moderate wages. But he'll probably improve Sunderland I suppose.

Read more: http://www.readytogo.net/smb/showthread.php?t=724931#ixzz24UGw7IQZ So many mongs there claiming to have wanted to sign him for ages, Steven Fletcher?, really?!?

Just glad we now have mini Tiote and Anita to cover Glad that Pards decided to play them for the full 90 minutes less than 48 hours before this match, like. Confident Tiote will play though. They're both young lads, I'm sure at least one of them can play two games in three days if necessary. But yeah the fact that they did play suggests Tiote will be fit for Chelsea.

Just glad we now have mini Tiote and Anita to cover

Three games in seven days for Chelsea's first team, plus we've got a pretty good recent record at Stamford Bridge. They're looking good going forward, but so far they've faced Wigan and Reading so its hardly enough to judge them on. Obviously its going to be a very difficult game, but I don't think there's any reason to shit ourselves over it

That's on profit they make. Some people assume that but as far as I know there's no proof that any sell on fee is on profit only. There is no proof that there is a sell on fee. Maybe not, but I think just about every source going reported a sell on fee. Some claimed on the total fee and some claimed on profit. Not sure which one's true.

They should treat it as £25m really as Chelsea upped their Torres bid to cover the extra. They were only going to pay £40m until we asked for £35m for Carroll didnt they? You're joking yeah?

That's on profit they make. Some people assume that but as far as I know there's no proof that any sell on fee is on profit only.

Pollution filled scum hole.

If he scores 20+ this season I can see us laughing at a bid of £20m.

Is strawberry syrup allowed on Ramadan?

If we don't sign another striker now and Cisse and Ba go to the ACON in January then we've got a transfer window at the same time to sign a backup. But if we don't sign a right back now Danny fucking Simpson plays there for at least the first 5 months of the season.. Right backs a much bigger priority.

He's got to be thinking now "what the luck have I joined?? "

Its not a terrible fee for them, but I've got a feeling it'll be seen as another steal several months from now

Aye, looks that way. Maybe. harsh him calling pardew a 'get' though. Nah he means Simpson, right back get that he is.

Nothing wrong with wanting to discuss things with Pardew first. But he is making his mouth go to the press a bit too much like.

How do they work then? Contact lenses

Where's that come from?

Explains these comments on another forum then http://memeimages.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/trollface-ugly-grin-smiling.jpg You bitter dutch cunts

Wanted to make the transfer from the start. (Their talking if Raiola is to blame). No, they are not. Most seem upset with the Ajax board to allow this transfer to happen as they fear it will cost them the title this year. Anita has been seen an important player for their last two titles. There is also a sense of irritation with their fallen stature, that an Ajax starter would leave them to play for a mid-table EPL team. Many Dutch fans still think all EPL teams are like Stoke. Compare it with Arsenal fans and RVP. Someone should remind them we finished 5th last year

Nah I doubt they're going to loan him to a side that finished above them last season.

That's one of the reasons it won't completely stop overspending. It'll only stop the more obvious examples IMO, for instance no more Man City/Chelsea's in future. The likes of Chelsea/Man City ect will still find ways to spend more than they really earn but at least they'll have limits imposed on them (right now Man City have limitless resources) while clubs that already spend close to their means won't be effected (very good for us). For smaller clubs that currently spend well above their means this could effect them most as they may find it harder to find ways around the rules, but that could be for their own good in the long run (see Rangers/Portsmouth).