Teasy

Could 3-4 weeks have been for him to get back into training and this for his first game back? In which case he's being a confusing cunt.

So this looks like a permanent move then?

The QPR game was always going to be the earliest he would make his comeback, even if he got back to training when Pardew originally said he would.

Do you mean between LFC and NUFC? As you surely don't believe we are waiting for Jose's replacement to sign before we let him go? Yes As to the second question, I don't know, we should do though IMO, make Liverpool wait if we don't have our left back in for the Arsenal game.

Enrique isn't gone until everythings signed on both sides.

You're really trying to keep this one running aren't you

was never gonna get a game anyway Think he was joking like.

Nobody seems to know, but it just seems unlikely that he'd say "Fuck you newcastle" if he was only going on loan again. That's IF he's really said that, can anyone confirm that quote is real?

It looked like he went to shake Smiths hand and then turned it into a: http://www.istockphoto.com/file_thumbview_approve/6069570/2/istockphoto_6069570-hand-gesture-pointing-or-gun.jpg I'll have to watch it again to see if I was imagining it

Maybe he's just saying that because.. he can also play as a striker? Not because we've bought him to play as a striker. If we played 4-3-3 it would be with two advanced wingers either side of a proper striker anyway rather then 3 strikers.

Now if we could only just get rid of Smith!

If he's really made those comments then it would seem the move must be permenant, I really hope so because the fuckers a total waste of space. Also no matter what's happened behind the scenes he's got no right to go on like that after picking up £50k a week for the last 3 years for doing fuck all. He's come over here, gotten paid over £7.5m for nothing and left with his middle finger up, what an utter cunt.

In a years time they'll be talking about him as the best left back they've had in recent memory, they're just too self important to realise at the moment. He's a far better signing for them than Andy Carroll will ever be.

Bates is complaining about us only being prepared to pay £40k a week to have Smith play for them yet he says nothing about the greedy cunt himself! If they cant pay the other £20k a week Smith could just accept a £10k a week wage drop to play for them, but will he?, will he fuck..

He's clearly just picking the Sunderland team plus any player that's meant to be leaving Newcastle If Tiote was suddenly supposed to be off he'd get in there ahead of Cattermole. Because as usual everything they do is more about having a go at Newcastle than it is about supporting Sunderland.

I've spoiled his fun mate.

Dave as long as you keep posting quotes and assuming the most negative meaning from them I'll be there like the little angel on your shoulder telling you that it might not be as bad as you think

Caulkin - "Believe Pardew still has to persuade board to free cash for striker though. Meetings this week." Jesus fucking wept. He could be referring to a particular striker that Pardew wants but Ashley/Llambias (most likely through Carr) aren't sure about. Considering we've made bids for strikers recently.

I've been wondering about that, if as we have been told that all new contracts(wages), Tiote, Barton (if he signs), the new players, Ba, Cabaye, Marvin, Abeid and now Eggyhead..........have been factored into the £35m, does that not mean that any outgoing turnover from the club can't include the wages of those players for the term of their contracts, as they are already paid in advance so to speak. If the club include those players wages for the year in next years accounts as an expense going out, why ? Who's actually said all of that is coming out of the Carroll fee though? I think its a misunderstanding coming from the fact that the Carroll fee will go into the clubs revenue and all costs will come out of that revenue. Not that the exact way its working is really that important if the end result is money coming in and not going back into the squad (or at least a significant portion of it).

Routledge was probably on half the wage Marveaux is on. Pretty sure the £50k wage rumour was going round when we first signed him. Who knows how true it is.

We could do this all day I just think you probably overate Routledge, how many times have you seen him play in the Premier League? About five or six times I suppose. Matter of opinion until he starts a few games consecutively for you. I'm looking forward to seeing how he does. I'm just convinced it will be horrible. I don't dislike him or anything. If he does well, fair play to the lad. I think I've to drink my own piss as well. Did you make a bet on here like? Just said it on the whim somewhere on this thread. Not sure if someone picked up on it. Nailed on last minute winner this season from him at SD.com@SJP* * Last minute winner at the prawn sandwich stadium

We could do this all day I just think you probably overate Routledge, how many times have you seen him play in the Premier League? About five or six times I suppose. Matter of opinion until he starts a few games consecutively for you. I'm looking forward to seeing how he does. I'm just convinced it will be horrible. I don't dislike him or anything. If he does well, fair play to the lad. I think I've to drink my own piss as well. Did you make a bet on here like?