Theregulars

I have a good grip, thanks. Can you point me to any evidence of Elliott Anderson playing well or making a memorable contribution to a match instead of just dismissing my arguments? Your argument makes no sense - I’m not complaining about the result or its context. I’m saying Anderson isn’t good enough based on visual evidence of him playing football for us.

It’s an observation that he isn’t good enough. What’s he done, in your opinion, to suggest that he is?

Why?

Hopefully that’s the last we see of Anderson. Comprehensively not good enough at any aspect of the game to play serious minutes for us.

Anderson completely at fault. Really, really shouldn’t have been on the field since about 30 mins. Piss poor.

Can one not simultaneously think the team is playing better but one player still poorly?

Long past time to take Anderson off now.

At least Almiron is trying to force the issue. Most of his team mates could use the same endeavour.

We’re not going to do anything with this personnel without speed and quick passing. This weird ponderous 3 at the back and running sideways is boring.

Longstaff has also been really, really poor after midweek fawning.

I reckon Anderson is only there to spare the embarrassment of a pre-HT substitutIon. He’s been an active impediment

Tonali again doesn’t look on the same wavelength as the team

Is disaster new slang for coincidence?

Anderson passes the ball backwards a lot

Is there a simultaneous youth game maybe? Either that or his performance in the LC suggested he's not there yet (I'd agree).

Surprised Murphy isn't starting from a rotation perspective. I reckon Tonali will have a good game today.

He's been pretty consistent at saying he's got his group and will stick by them. I understand what he's doing, I think it just feels so weird because we watch the premier league so see players in and out of form. I do think there is something in the argument that some players perform better for country over club (set up, less pressure etc) and seem to be able to switch it back on (I don't think Maguire is too bad for England, I've not watched Phillips play enough for England to know). The downsides for me are the argument vs incentive - surely players need to see that consistent good form will at least get them a competitive 10-20 mins from the bench? - and the fact that players aren't playing enough football to be in any sort of rhythm / form, or aren't playing any competitive football. The professional game is now one of such fine margins that any lapse in concentration or rust can cost you a tournament. I like Southgate and back him to continue, and it might just be a case of "you can't have both", but I think there's room for a mix of loyalty and rewarding performance. I'd set up an international squad as, e.g. "here are my 16 established, I keep the other 7 open for form" and you have whatever mechanism for switching between the two as time / circumstance require. Sometimes I wonder whether he just feels desperately sorry for Maguire and wants to help him out, which I can get behind.

Tekkaboo, son.

CONTENT

I think they just think most people are idiots, it's not confined to football supporters.

I think Van Gaal has it right about them: the focus of the people who run the show is much more about the global business than the football. Still, never a safe bet to write off Manchester United. With that said, I really enjoyed that. The way the happiness gets sucked out is chef’s kiss.

The manager has literally said tonali is training less because he’s not used to the intensity so they’re giving him more recovery time. You’ll know if it’s a good signing or not by the end of the season.

And thus the plans are explained.

Ian’s brother is a keeper, and a bloody fine one at that!!

Sandro, miserable git