Jump to content

biggs

Member
  • Posts

    5,982
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by biggs

  1. Dont know why everyones getting so anti Ireland for its not so long ago people wanted Barton sent packing .
  2. Ireland has been shit this season admittedly but limited opportunitys and SWP is shit full stop a modern day Ruel Fox imho .
  3. It is in January when fuck all else is happening
  4. Since when has Ben Arfa been a key man in the last few months
  5. The pub! he's from scotland so a cemetery, public park or bus stop may be more in keeping. On a serious note i cannot see any goals in our front men in this game unless Spuds defenders have a mare clutching at straws tbh.
  6. google: stephen ireland car Ok, so the bloke is gay and/or has utterly terrible taste. Doesn't necessarily make him a head case does it? Anything else..? Ginger too
  7. This. I'm not even English so couldn't care less who gets it, but this sounds incredibly wasteful. On the face of it, it's an awful option, but the truth of the matter is that the British Olympic Committee got it totally wrong when they opted for an 'ecological blueprint' for the Olympic Stadium which amongst other things involved using less than 50% of the amount of steel that would normally be required for a structure of this size. Yes, it may look great now but using inadequate materials will severely affect the longetivity of the stadium. The Millenium Dome had a life expectancy of 25 years before its conversion into the O2 and by all accounts the Olympic Stadium's lifespan isn't expected to be much longer. One of the people involved in the Olympic project summed up the situation when said "The Olympic Park is amazing. The other venues are all astounding and built with very sound futures ahead of them, either through continued use or revised use following the games. The Olympic Stadium is not. It is poorly designed and badly thought out. It will be phenomenal for the experience of a few weeks of summer sport - after that, it needs to be pulled down if it isn't to become a shabby wasteland that blights the Elizabeth Park (what the Olympic Park will become after the games)" i thought "legacy" was a major part of the bid in that the stadium had to stay as it was for the furtherment of sport in general, particularly track and field. can't see how letting a football team have it would fulfill that. Most of the Stadia from previous Olympic games are not used apparently.
  8. I voted Spuds cos there is so much hostility to the move and its gonna be so much fun watching from a far. Great article here if you can be bothered to read it as it explains the bigger picture involving other clubs and the Olympic legacy Spurs And The Olympic Stadium: Stratford Hotspur Or A New Beginning? Published on January 14th, 2011 by Ian Supporters of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club are well-versed in the history of where their club comes from. The stories of grammar boys meeting under gaslight on a street corner are well woven into the fabric that makes up the history of the club, but the question that their supporters are now asking is not where they have come from, but where they will go going to in the near future. For a long time, it felt as if their move in the Olympic Stadium, five miles from White Hart Lane to Stratford, was either an attempt to lever concessions from the bodies involved in their already-public redevelopment plans to rebuild their existing ground or as a back-up plan for if they ran into difficulties over what was presumed to be their Plan A. Over the last few weeks, though, it has started to become increasingly clear that the owners of the club are serious about this move, and it is threatening to divide the club’s support in a season that, on the pitch at least, could yet end up being their most successful in decades. From the perspective of the club itself, a move to the Olympic Stadium makes pure, economic sense. The redevelopment of the White Hart Lane site will be expensive, in no small measure on account of the work required to be done the area immediately around the proposed new site. They argue that the total cost of the redevelopment of the site (which would see the Olympic Stadium torn down and replaced with a new ground for the club, with Spurs also paying for the redevelopment of the Crystal Palace Athletics Stadium to provide a sheath of ensuring an Olympic legacy after the 2012 games) would be around £200m less than the work required at White Hart Lane (although some argue that this is a fallacy, and that when the costs of the Crystal Palace redevelopment and a future lease on the Olympic Stadium would render any cost savings less lucrative than the nascent PR campaign is whispering about) and that such a move would only see the club displaced by five miles from its current home. The club is understood to believe that, with a higher proportion of the club’s support now living in the Home Counties than before, the better transport links (White Hart Lane is notoriously difficult to reach) will influence them to fall in behind their plan. The Olympic Stadium, however, is not all about Spurs. The club have made powerful friends in AEG, the entertainment giants who believe that they can make it profitable for the club, but the Olympic Stadium is in Stratford, and Stratford is in the London Borough Newham, and the local council supports the rival bid of West Ham United. West Ham intend to leave the athletics track in place and, on account of this, they also have the support of the influential UK Athletics, the predictably-named governing body for athletics in Britain. West Ham United’s Boleyn Ground (which is actually in East Ham rather than West Ham) is closer to the Olympic Stadium site and, in the overall scheme of the city, is quite clearly in East London in the same way that Stratford is but White Hart Lane quite clearly and evidently isn’t. Quite apart from this, very few people seem to be discussing what the effect might be upon Leyton Orient, the nearest Football League club to Stratford, if a Premier League club is parachuted in on their doorstep. It could, in the medium to long-term, be ruinous for a club that has, in being sandwiched between Spurs and West Ham in the crowded football landscape of London, struggled for attendances for years, even with them being at a distance of something approaching arm’s length. Orient’s owner, Barry Hearn, has been making noises about moving the club to Essex for some considerable time, and this could be an ideal opportunity to see this idea through to fruition. Of course, if Leyton Orient were to move, it could have an effect on the poor non-league club in whichever town or district he decides to pitch up. It seems likely that whatever domino effect will end up rippling through football’s food chain, affecting more and more vulnerable clubs as it goes. Much of this, however, seems to be disregarded in the bum rush for a cheap-ish new ground for a relative giant of the Premier League in London. Moreover, should the decision over the outcome of the Olympic Stadium be anything to do with football in the first place? One of the key ingredients of London’s successful bid for the 2012 games was the importance of legacy to the bid. The original plan was for part of the legacy was to be for the Olympic Stadium to be scaled back after the games, leaving a 25,000-seater permanent home for British athletics. There is something faintly unseemly about the way that this legacy is being cast aside in the rush for a new Premier League ground. Spurs’ Crystal Palace plan feels like a sop to tick a box in order to get what they want, while even with West Ham’s plan to keep the athletics track seems unlikely to end in anything other than London’s Olympic legacy very much playing second fiddle to Premier League football. Financial considerations to one side, doesn’t British athletics deserve the home that it was promised when the Olyimpics were brought to London? Of all of the plans on the table, the Spurs one looks like being the most divisive. Five miles may not sound like a great distance to many people, but in tribal London these considerations matter and many Spurs supporters are bitterly against the proposed move. There has been much talk amongst those against the move of, “Spurs conceding North London to Arsenal” and, considering the manner in which Arsenal ended up in North London in the first place, such a volte face might well be too much for many Spurs supporters to bear. The local MP, David Lammy, certainly think so, and has stated that: Tottenham Hotspur was set up by a bunch of young people at All Hallows church in Tottenham 120 years ago. In the event that the current owners of Spurs take the club to Stratford, a new club will emerge. This is no different from the situation that emerged with MK Dons and AFC Wimbledon. Locally I will work with any new team, with the local authority, to ensure we retain the name Tottenham. They will have to take on a different name if they are to leave. I will protect the interests of Tottenham people in ensuring we don’t have a club on the other side of London called Tottenham Hotspur that does not reflect at all the interests of the local community as it stands today. This may be overstating the matter somewhat at present, but perhaps the question that faces Spurs supporters will turn out to be what price they are prepared put on the very identity of their club and the community that they are part of. Tottenham is one of North London’s less well-to-do areas, and the departure of the football club would rip the soul from the area that they have called home for one hundred and twenty-eight years. Many feel that Tottenham Hotspur in Stratford wouldn’t be Tottenham Hotspur any more, and the growing disquiet (which has even led to talk of a breakaway club should the Stratford move come to fruition) has found a voice through the supporters’ group We Are N17, which states that: We would prefer to remain at White Hart Lane in Tottenham, as it stands today, rather than move to Stratford and chasing the revenue from a larger stadium. Such a move would, for us, destroy Tottenham and all it has stood for the day we leave our home. West Ham’s bid for the Olympic Stadium remains the favourite to win the race, but the question for Tottenham supporters that are wavering at present may well turn out to be one of whether they have the stomach for a fight against the owners of the club. Spurs’ architectural advisor, David Keirle, recently stated that, “I was heavily involved in the Man City project. Nobody wanted to leave Maine Road. A few years down the line, nobody would ever go back”, but moving within a city like Manchester isn’t the same as moving across London. There is an element truth to the old adage about London being a collection of villages rather than a city, and this is especially true in its outermost districts. Opinion seems to be very much split amongst supporters of the club at present, but perhaps the true split will only be seen should Spurs get the nod above West Ham United. Daniel Levy has worked wonders in turning the fortunes of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club around after a mostly dismal 1990s. He may find, however, that, his biggest challenge will be to keep their fanbase unified should his plan together.
  9. biggs

    Tino's Been Back

    Legend and its great he still cares for us with his wealth and all that . Would love to be invited too one of his partys :bng:
  10. biggs

    Sunderland...

    This can go 2 ways Bruce stays and they have replace Bent or they go into free fall and i hope the later obviously
  11. biggs

    John Carver

    Great news im buzzin like a chav
  12. biggs

    Nile Ranger

    Scored a hatrick for reserves today against Wigan
  13. Great news 6th place in the premiership and wants to jump ship
  14. biggs

    Alan Pardew

    Oh dear if this shit is to believed Pardew ready to switch transfer targets Published Date: 17 January 2011 Miles Starforth ALAN Pardew's ready to abandon his search for a new striker – because of the form of the players he inherited. Pardew – who has top scorer Andy Carroll sidelined – has been looking to add a forward to his Newcastle United squad in this month's transfer window. But recent performances, including those of Shola Ameobi and Leon Best in yesterday's Wear-Tyne derby, have put a question mark in Pardew's mind as to whether the funds he has will be better spent elsewhere, with Queens Park Rangers midfielder Adel Taarabt reportedly a target QPR are also understood to be keen to take Wayne Routledge, also talked of as a makeweight in South Wales in United any move for Cardiff City striker Jay Bothroyd, back to Loftus Road. And Pardew, also looking at bringing in cover for left-back Jose Enrique, could rely on them again on Saturday – when his side entertain Tottenham Hotspur – as Carroll is unlikely to be fit. "Shola and Leon were as good as the home strikers," said Pardew. "They did very well indeed, and, for me, it was evens in the striking department. "That's good, because we have Andy carrying an injury. "This has altered my thinking in the transfer window. We might be looking to improve in other departments now. It's a possibility. "It depends on other areas. We may look to strengthen there instead now. "I have been really buoyed by Shola and Leon – they may just have saved me a problem looking elsewhere." Ameobi bossed former Newcastle defender Titus Bramble for much of the game after putting an early miss behind him, while Best was a willing runner alongside him. Pardew went on: "Leon's been very good indeed. "People say he was out of sorts, but I can only judge what I can see, and I don't know if I feel I want to change things." Meanwhile, Scottish Premier League club Hibernian, managed by former Newcastle No2 Colin Calderwood, are keen on taking striker Phil Airey on loan. * THE foot injury suffered by Newcastle United midfielder Alan Smith was today being assessed by the club. Smith, caught by Kieran Richardson in the first half, left the Stadium of Light on crutches.
  15. biggs

    Pitch invasions

    Got this off The Guardian ,a bit more info and at least it sounds there were proper officials watching. Sunderland fan bailed after alleged attack on Newcastle's Steve Harper • Seventeen-year-old supporter bailed until March, police say • Football Association awaiting reports before taking action The alleged incident happened after Steve Harper conceded a 90th-minute equaliser at the Stadium of Light. The Football Association was today awaiting reports into the trouble which flared during and after the Wear-Tyne derby between Sunderland and Newcastle at the Stadium of Light. A 17-year-old has been released on bail by Northumbria Police in connection with an alleged confrontation with the Newcastle goalkeeper Steve Harper on the pitch in the immediate aftermath of Asamoah Gyan's 90th-minute equaliser. Police said the arrested teenager was bailed until March and that investigations were ongoing. A total of 24 arrests were made, with rival fans clashing in ugly scenes on the final whistle. The FA had a crowd control adviser present at the match and will consider his report and that of the referee, Howard Webb, once they receive them. An FA spokesman said: "We are awaiting reports this morning and will be proceeding from there." The Sunderland manager, Steve Bruce, praised the home fans who handed the teenager over after his confrontation with Harper. "All I saw was Steve Harper on the floor," Bruce said. "I didn't know what had happened at the time. I would like say a 'well done' to the Sunderland fans who gave the kid up – and he is a kid, that's what I can't understand either, the age of the lad." Northumbria Police said the majority of fans behaved well but a small number were intent on causing trouble. Around 48,000 supporters attended the match at the Stadium of Light where there was a large police presence, who kept the supporters apart outside the ground by using an 8ft metal fence. Despite warnings to troublemakers in the run-up to the game, some fans still caused problems, police said. Temporary Chief Superintendent Steve Neill, match commander, said: "The crowd was mainly good-natured and the overwhelming majority wanted nothing more than to enjoy the action on the pitch in an atmosphere free from violence and disorder. "However, there were still some troublemakers who were determined to spoil things for the genuine fans. We had anticipated the potential for disorder and had the resources in place to deal with it swiftly and firmly. "The policing operation went well and I would like to commend the actions and professionalism of all the officers involved who managed to defuse a number of difficult situations. I would also like to thank the stewards for their assistance."
  16. Just waiting for the media to say "it was kenny who got the players to respond for the equaliser and that wouldnt happen under Hodgson" when in truth Liverpool were shit and got a penalty .
  17. Its only just happened tbh i was wondering why my song ended up as the link ask dave .
  18. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUjZjyIyNoE&feature=related
  19. If a toon fan had put a magpie on the pitch he would have added another as 1 for sorry 2 for joy so fuck off Taylor get your facts right you lesbo
  20. Gutted we only got the point as we far better team even with only 10 men ,Colo motm
×
×
  • Create New...