Colos Short and Curlies
Member-
Posts
12,759 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Colos Short and Curlies
-
Group C: 1. England, 2. Denmark, 3. Slovenia (Q), 4. Serbia
Colos Short and Curlies replied to Big River's topic in Football
Aye, if it was nil-nil you wouldn't say we deserve to nick a goal and win but with it being 1-0 you wouldn't say Serbia deserve an equalizer either. -
Thought he was in prison
-
Group B: 1. Spain, 2. Italy, 3. Croatia, 4. Albania
Colos Short and Curlies replied to Big River's topic in Football
I didn’t think VAR ruled on yellow cards? Surely Broja was a red or nothing if it was on review? -
Group A: 1. Germany, 2. Switzerland, 3. Hungary, 4. Scotland
Colos Short and Curlies replied to Big River's topic in Football
Keane was desperate to let a few feffs and jeffs out there. Di ld well to keep it PG -
Group A: 1. Germany, 2. Switzerland, 3. Hungary, 4. Scotland
Colos Short and Curlies replied to Big River's topic in Football
im going to save this quote for Sunday but replace Gunn with Pickford -
Group A: 1. Germany, 2. Switzerland, 3. Hungary, 4. Scotland
Colos Short and Curlies replied to Big River's topic in Football
he’ll be fine later on when he’s out having drinks with Woodsy -
Group A: 1. Germany, 2. Switzerland, 3. Hungary, 4. Scotland
Colos Short and Curlies replied to Big River's topic in Football
She’s got a great accent and tone for the type of analysis she’s doing. It just works. in other matters, the long sleeved German shirt is glorious in other other matters, this is definitely an international tournament where you’d not write off the Germans -
First: West Ham home Boxing: Ipswich away Last premier league: Fulham away Last: Liverpool Wembley (FA cup final)
-
Financial Fair Play / Profit & Sustainability
Colos Short and Curlies replied to Mattoon's topic in Football
But surely that would just trigger a tax bill and wouldn't force the cash to change hands between the 2 parties. Tax bill would still make it worthwhile as a FFP dodge -
I don't think offsides are covered by the clear and obvious bit
-
Financial Fair Play / Profit & Sustainability
Colos Short and Curlies replied to Mattoon's topic in Football
The hype and sales of the shirt today are a shot in the arm for RTP/APT discussions going forward. How anyone can argue down the commercial impact of being associated with us is one for Masters to work out -
I've been educating my boys with the 1998 Brazil adverts and the 2002 Cage epic, but fucking hell that video wipes the floor with them
-
I'm wondering if the Mrs would mind if we didn't buy a new house and use the deposit to buy one of everything for me and the kids
-
Its 2 days man. Its so rare nowadays to have a release of anything that is unspoilt. I really hope that they manage to keep it underwraps until Friday am. I'm going all Likely lads on this now and not going to enter this thread until I've seen the release. Partying like its 1995
-
You’re not looking at the bigger picture here. Kane is destined never to win a trophy. Drop him/he gets injured and we are destined to win the Euros
-
Just look at his career man
-
Does anyone actually want to win the Euros with those line ups? not only should Kane not be starting we need him out of the squad full stop. It’s impossible for us to win it with Kane there
-
This season really was 94/95 revisited wasn’t it ?
-
It would no doubt have the highest ratio of lurkers to posters guaranteed
-
I try to avoid getting geeky on here but if you go technical then FRS102 is silent on the period (day/week/month) other than it being over the UEL (or contract length here) so you defer to management judgement and estimates. I've been doing this a long time both as an auditor and then trough to CFO, you would apply a daily calculation to financial assets but for the vast majority of PPE or intangibles it is monthly, your depreciation or amortisation charge would be equal across the 12 months and not higher in May than February. And I will go all Billy Big Bollocks here, but I did audit Wayne Rooney's amortisation schedule in 2005 and that was a monthly calculation.
-
Yes if we had written off future wages and then sold the player so didn’t have to pay those wages you would release the residual. we are pretty much down to Hayden with that now though. we don’t have much in our accounts that would make a difference to faff about with
-
And the reality is that there are always management discretions on applying the standards. Where someone is paid weekly or monthly then you would be well within your rights to base calculations on that basis. And I can tell you 100% that football clubs amortise transfer fees monthly.
-
It would be monthly in reality, daily would be far too much of a faff. The accounting policy says the full value is capitalised on the date of the transaction and then amortised straight line (i.e. the same amount every month) over the length of the contract. So it is true that we'd only have 1 months cost this year for a June signing, that would be £583,333.33 in the year for a £35m player with a 5 year contract. Forest would get the full benefit of the sale this year
-
It's not even that definite that Pope would get an offer elsewhere that would be attractive to him. Make him the default cup keeper - there's 5 games in winning the League cup, 6 in winning the FA cup and 14 in the Conf League. With there always being a chance of injury or suspension to get some league games it may well be his best option