Parky

Will learning about race issues etc be part of your training Coach HTT?

Sorry Les, but I think that's bullshit. I didn't realise the overall figure is that low...It is a bit surprising. I think Sir Les wouldn't really be making stuff up and he has no axe to grind as he is actually doing the courses. I thought Ince was 'nailed on' for the Wolves job.

Tbf altough it doesn't apply directly it was an interesting read and has a bearing on race and sport. I think Ince and Ferdinand have a good chance of breaking through into the higher leagues. Part of the problem has been the likes of Gullit and Barnes being so rubbish.

Kin hell....Trisha Lives!! mackems.gif

do you mean me ? So long as he doesn't go around threatening or carrying out threats to blow up innocent british people, and enforcing his views and desire to change our society to what he wants, then OK. If he wants to do that, then yes, he can piss off somewhere else. Hook line and sinker.

Bottle has shown and to his credit in this instance a Hannibal like ability to deal with irritating quizzlings...

There! There you go with that tongue again! I hope you trip on it in the same manner as you continue to stumble towards any semblance of an worthwhile arguement. If I comment to a friend how unacceptably dire I found the column in the Times to be this morning, would you class that as a 'reply'? I gravely suspect that you might. I and the rest of humanity however, would not. mackems.gif Sorry Alex but he does rather have you here. I understand to be undone by a novice in these matters surely does not sit well.......

Tbf I don't think he was replying, but commenting... In this context, what's the difference? There probably isn't one, but in all honesty if I were to rule on this you would lose.....just...Offers of free Beer might reverse this mind. Seething about the 9/11 thread on TT tbh. I'm taking the OED definition over your's and numbnuts' though ...as well you might sweetie..

Putting more thought and valuble time into interpreting your post, I have also been drawn to the possiblility that I think you might actually be referring to the process by which my words came to the screen. But you see, I did not press 'reply', I pressed the button labled 'quote', and susequently the form element labeled 'post' which submitted my missive to the remote machine. And so, even in the most abstract sense there was no 'reply'. I hope you can learn from this lesson and grow into at least a gentleman, for I fear that as a scholar you may have already missed the mark. Arf. A reply is a response to something said or written tbh. I think that before you butchered that dictionary definition, it was meant to read "To give an answer or response in speech or writing". In the truest sense, I did neither. I didn't have to look it up. Unlike you it would seem I simply cannot comprehend the audacity it must take to wave that tongue at me while you continue to revel face down in a barrel brimful of ignorance. Getting things wrong does not deserve a little dance just because you claim to have managed the feat without the use of a dictionary. Amen to that. .....and the way he constructs his sentences with the initmated use of the sotto voce is to die for.......

Tbf I don't think he was replying, but commenting... In this context, what's the difference? There probably isn't one, but in all honesty if I were to rule on this you would lose.....just...Offers of free Beer might reverse this mind.

Tbf I don't think he was replying, but commenting...

Putting more thought and valuble time into interpreting your post, I have also been drawn to the possiblility that I think you might actually be referring to the process by which my words came to the screen. But you see, I did not press 'reply', I pressed the button labled 'quote', and susequently the form element labeled 'post' which submitted my missive to the remote machine. And so, even in the most abstract sense there was no 'reply'. I hope you can learn from this lesson and grow into at least a gentleman, for I fear that as a scholar you may have already missed the mark. Arf. A reply is a response to something said or written tbh. I think that before you butchered that dictionary definition, it was meant to read "To give an answer or response in speech or writing". In the truest sense, I did neither. I didn't have to look it up. Unlike you it would seem I simply cannot comprehend the audacity it must take to wave that tongue at me while you continue to revel face down in a barrel brimful of ignorance. Getting things wrong does not deserve a little dance just because you claim to have managed the feat without the use of a dictionary. It is rare to see Alex pulled up on semantics. Very enjoyable. ^-^

If Eto'o had played and not Saviola they would have scored 3. Nahh i don't think so ^-^... to defeat Beauty sometimes u got to play Ugly I don't think Liv were over aggressive, just very organised and focussed. i did not mean to say Liv were so aggressive.... i just feel even Barca have weakness in their game play... not that i say Barca wasn't so good... what i want to say is if versus Barca team must play hard and use pressed tactic and not allowed Barca to control the game.. agree with you liv.. were very organized and focused.. Ok. You are right in a way, Rijkaard has to sacrifice (for these games) one of the creative mf and something that can stand upto Gerrard and Alonso. Xavi on his own really is not enough. Messi and Ronny are just back from injury and they missed Eto'o. IMO Rijkaard hasn't replenished the squad correctly which is bringing too much pressure on CD partnership too easily. Iniesta nor Motta are ready for these kind of games that much is clear. Good players with a lot of promise will do enough in La Liga, but not in the CL. Saviola confirms yet again he will never be a real top class striker.

Look at Spurs. Gonna win the WORLD.

If Eto'o had played and not Saviola they would have scored 3. Nahh i don't think so ^-^... to defeat Beauty sometimes u got to play Ugly I don't think Liv were over aggressive, just very organised and focussed.

I think his knee is f*****. So? .....fit right in..

I think his knee is fucked.

If Eto'o had played and not Saviola they would have scored 3.

Coming to the end of Rijkaard I reckon. A lot of children unhappy that the Barca ice cream isn't tasting quite right anymore. Saviola confirms once again he is rubbish - wasting at least 3 clear cut chances. Barca's main problems is that both Ronny and Messi are coming back from injury and Rijkaard needs one more strong def mf as Gerrard and Alonso a little behind had the run of the middle.

Best young player in the world is Leo, only player I've ever seen who Chelsea could not handle one bit. Totally correct.

Will there be a cumshot in this thread?

He can't come back now after all that has gone before. But I like to think a better manager would have found a way of keeping him at the club in a productive manner. Fence sitting is an art you know.

.....but everytime he coughs we get one of these threads..And all the old stuff is dragged up.

...a precision strike has killed this thread it seems... ^-^

....not fit to tie Anelka's boots tbh.. We'll see. I like him though, doing well and really getting stuck in now.