IMO, Martins has been "good" this season. Not great, but better than average. We've seen him have terrific games, and we've seen him have terrible games.
This is all in a team managed by probably the worst manager in the league and surrounded by under performing players. What is it that says that if the rest of the team was under performing, didn't Martins do the same?
I'm fairly sure that Allardyce can improve on Martin's Excellent-Games ratio, witch will make Martins worth a lot more than the £10m we paid for him.
And yes, Gemmil, I CAN see this from Sweden.