Conjo

They would surely become NEBB then?

fyp

...and ended up with Tore Andre Flo

7ish years ago since we´ve scored there, 8ish years ago since we got a point and 18ish years ago since we won. I´m amazed at how many people actually think we´ll win this one. What´s the odds on 3-0?

Society of Black Lawyers Sounds like something taken out of an episode of South Park

He never learned how to use it to full effect playing on the shoulder, but to claim the guy isn't fast, is a completely mental thing to say in public. Seem to remember a game against Blackburn(?) when he passed a through ball to himself?

Seeing Shola on the wing brought back some painful memories. Yay for 3 points. That´s about it....

Smells like a customary 3-0 win for Liverpool

Everton pen there surely?

This ref has been brutal towards Everton so far

Belgium do have an awesome team (on paper). GK:Mignolet DF: Kompany, Verthongen, Vermaelen, Alderweireld MF: Dembele, Fellaini, Witsel, Defour, Hazard FW:Mirallas, Lukaku, Benteke, Vossen None of these are over 26 years of age. In addition to that, they have some routine in Van Buyten and Simons and other relatively unknown (to me at least) but young players.

Think you need better bait to get some bites joeyt

Same here - had been waiting to get home from work to watch it. aaaaawwwww, really? Me too... thon of a BITHCH......

Bit of both

We should be in contention for 6th together with Everton & Liverpool. 8th is the minimum position for me to deem it an acceptable season. Just can´t see us besting Man Utd, Man City, Chelsea, Arsenal & Tottenham. Not "panic" time just yet.

I think he looked completely out of it, so I guess arguing it is pointless. I do however think that the way the game was, with us so deep on the pitch, a fresh pair of legs would have been more beneficial in midfield than on top. Cisse wouldn´t have been able to cope on his own against O´Shea and Cuellar.

I think all of you are wrong. Coloccini seemed to be struggling to run after he got the cramp, so no problem with that sub. He really should have got Cabaye off for Anita instead of Ben Arfa for Obertan at that time. Cabaye had nothing left. He had to float the ball in on the last set pieces as he didn´t have the strenght to lift the ball otherwise. Could barely jog.

Incredible really why we dropped so deep. I don´t understand it. The one thing that has been a big sore achilles heel for us this season has been defending set pieces. We invited them to set camp outside our box, which resultet in many free kicks and corners. I knew we would concede on one of them, and surely we did. Another thing is the fact that Sunderland has some great shooters in Larsson, Gardener and Vaughan.

FUCK FUCK FUCK!! Irritated my to no end that Pardew subbed Ben Arfa instead of Cabaye at that point. Cabaye was done, nothing left. Anita in for him would have increased our chances more as Ben Arfa seemed to be fine. Pardew should have instructed the team to press higher. Fuck me, talk about making things harder for ourselves. Tiote should not have been off. We would have won had not the ref been against us, or if Pardew somehow found his balls that he obviously left back home this morning. FUCK!

The primate gets acceptance from the others by a round of applause. No no...not the case: http://www.readytogo.net/smb/showpost.php?p=13631671&postcount=24

Kept Souness in the job longer than necessary? Remember quite a few on here thought the same.

There is too much speculation around how much the deal is worth. One thing we can conclude with through logical thinking is that Ashley would never cancel the deal with Virgin if a better deal wasn't on the table.

We need to get Mathieu DebtTouche in january now

How is that possible Bluestar?

As long as the deal is financially better for the club than the one we have with Virgin I don't have too many objections other than the fact that Wonga is a lame name. Wonga provide a service that is optional for anyone to take them up on, and as far as I can tell, they give good information of what their service will cost in total, including consequences if repayment is not made. It is a crappy situation to be in if you need money ugrently, but if you know the fix is only temporary, and that you will not be able to pay back within the given time limit coming off worse than you started off, then why loan the money in the first place? What should Wonga do about it? Just write the debt off because they feel sorry for the people that couldn't pay back and go pro bono? They do financial background checks on all people before giving out a loan, and if it is deemed that they are able to pay back the loan (which parameters I assume is not governed by Wonga), why should they get the wrong end of the stick when people are not able to pay back? People are too quick to victimise themselves. If you take up a loan you cannot pay back for whatever reason - tough luck, and try to deal with it as best as you can. Try to broker a repayment scheme with Wonga, get a long term loan from the bank/social services (if that is something they provide in UK) to repay Wonga, loan from family, friends etc.