clintdempsey

Well, I doubt he's got a chance to end up at a bigger club than Newcastle if he leaves Spurs. The only team I think would suit him better than us would probably be Fulham. None of the Top 10 will have him I'd say. He has stagnated a bit at Spurs and he's a few years older than last time he was here. I think he would be a realistic signing and a good signing at that.

Might be time for me to apply for a position at our Norwegian offices then. Would be lovely if Viasat could do the same here in Sweden.

Skintoned panties maybe? Unless she's got a really pale one that is. With seams.

I'm sure UEFA has stated that they will implement a rule that will only allow transfer fees to be paid over two years at most.

As a statement and a press release it's woefully written. They have tried to be as clear as possible but in doing so they have said absolutely nothing new. No communication from the top of the club other than prepared statements? Nothing new there. With the "new capital outlay" debacle I read it as there won't be any new money from MA to sanction new signings. He wants a club that lives within its means. Some money from the new sponsorship deals, TV deals and so on will be allocated for transfers. And I don't see anything wrong with that.

I'm sure Ashley has put in £25.5 million during this financial year, he might have to put in more before it comes to a close but I doubt it. I think it says in the accounts that he put in a further £25.5m before yearend (Dec 31 2009). Since then he has according to Llambias put in a further £5.5m for running costs, and £5.5m for transfers during January. But if that's true, who knows?

£20 million a year only adds up to £60 million, he's already put in much more than that. He made the £20m a year statement AFTER Keegan went. He'd already paid in at least £70m the day he arrived which, the way I see it, was not part of the £20m a year he was always willing to bankroll us with. Current debt is £111m (up to 2009) plus £25m (09/10) which means his spending over 3 seasons is (111-70)+25 = £66m or £22m per season. Credit to him for sticking to his word....so far. Didn't he put in £36m this year. I'm sure I saw that somewhere. Right, here it is: http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/n/newcastle_united/8553411.stm What Llambias said to the BBC doesn't tally with note on the accounts. Ok.

£20 million a year only adds up to £60 million, he's already put in much more than that. He made the £20m a year statement AFTER Keegan went. He'd already paid in at least £70m the day he arrived which, the way I see it, was not part of the £20m a year he was always willing to bankroll us with. Current debt is £111m (up to 2009) plus £25m (09/10) which means his spending over 3 seasons is (111-70)+25 = £66m or £22m per season. Credit to him for sticking to his word....so far. Didn't he put in £36m this year. I'm sure I saw that somewhere. Right, here it is: http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/n/newcastle_united/8553411.stm

I think Tosic has stated that he wants to stay in Germany.

thats freddie eastwood. And Gignac as well.

It's definitely Zlatan and Pique.

Awww, how cute!

For me it's either Forest or Blackpool. I think both of them have played some nice football this year and I definitely have more respect for both Billy Davies and Ian Holloway than Nigel Pearson or Dave Jones.

Is the brackets figures successful passes? If so that's only completed 28 passes in 96mins+ of football. That's ridiculous. You'd think the word completed next to it would kind of give away the answer. 67 passes completed/successful.

It's quite cool when the Red Wings' fans sing it during the playoffs though.

I've seen Friends. And it's shit.

Affirmative it was carrolls ex wasn't it and how would it justify a physical attack ? I thought it was the mother of Carroll's child? I honestly think I'd twat my friend or co-worker if any of them made a move for the mother of my children. Wouldn't you? Nah. I would have appreciated being asked beforehand if someone had serious intentions with an ex of mine, but I wouldn't expect it at all. Kid or no kid. (assuming it's a 100% dead relationship, no chance in hell of getting back together) I was under the assumption that Carroll and the lass were still together. But if they aren't then it's a different discussion altogether.

Affirmative it was carrolls ex wasn't it and how would it justify a physical attack ? I thought it was the mother of Carroll's child? I honestly think I'd twat my friend or co-worker if any of them made a move for the mother of my children. Wouldn't you?

So, to summarize: Carroll wacked Taylor in the face while the latter was in an ice bath. The "attack" was over Carroll's bird (which incidentally somewhat justifies it). But the extent of the damages for Taylor were grossly exaggerated in the press. Correct?

That is one good movie by the way.

It's still rather fascinating that they have been able to keep this under wraps. Not a single leak from anyone.

QFT

He is added though.

From the Michael Reiziger school of lips. She could suck the chrome off a trailer hitch with that mouth. Damn.

Sounds a lot like a certain Irishman now plying his trade at Man City.