AyeDubbleYoo

There’s nothing left to buy at the moment anyway, unless maybe you want a XXS size adidas shellsuit.

Please show me the stats for what Longstaff did that meant we won those games. Or any other game for that matter

The way people reacted to the signing, it was clear that Gordon had a lot to prove when he arrived.

Do you know what it means?

What’s PSR anchoring?

It’s been in the works since before the season started by the sound of it. He said he’s known about it since the summer IIRC.

Yeah, he did for palace as well but I think it was mainly because Anderson needs to be right. Sure he can play either.

Yeah Burn’s performance is irrelevant really. Botman will take his place and the new CB will eventually replace Schar. Of course the new CB might’ve played LCB temporarily, I thought that about Guehi.

Given that you can easily smuggle a Greggs in.

Meaning you have to smash 4 pints in 30 minutes before you go in and another 2 at half time. Sensible.

While I'm all in favour of slagging off Masters, didn't they need 14 clubs to vote for all of these rules?

Mad way to treat a young player.

He's a pure class act. Also well done to whoever gave him a lift home from Metrocentre.

Actually a really interesting interview, despite the bloke asking the questions.

Nice, get a celebratory goal against Chelsea.

True but not sure I would say it papered over cracks when everyone saw the cracks and talked about them constantly

That’s why I like Hall so much. FWIW I don’t see why Tino won’t be very effective for us. As we know the new RW will be a big step forward.

I think it was Burnley with Pope where they deliberately allowed a lot of shots from distance between the two CBs because it was so unlikely to lead to a goal.

Guess the interior fitting can happen really quickly once electrics and all that are done. Surprised still, it looked a wreck last time I looked.

We actually have decent CB depth, 5 for 2 positions. It’s just two are injured.

We have so many debates where we act like something doesn’t make sense when the explanation is fairly easy to see. Not that we always have to agree, but it’s weird to act like there’s somehow no reasoning behind it.

Yes but not very well and not as well as Hall. And we didn’t have Kelly when we signed Hall. Beggars belief that signing someone as talented as Hall is somehow bad. We can’t do anything right at the moment. The season has got off to a difficult start and we’ve all become emo about everything NUFC has done.

Aye I know, but at the same time I don’t see many tactical breakdowns of how a dedicated DM would work with our system and style of play. I’m sure there are merits to both approaches but Bruno is brilliant at what he does in that position.

Doesn’t seem that bad if Bruno is a top 6 and the others are best at 8. Actually it seems pretty good. Hall was a superb signing and both him and Tino were two of the countries highest-rated youngsters. I don’t get this line of thinking at all. If we didn’t have Hall we’d be desperate for a LB and if we didn’t have Tino we’d be playing Krafth at RB. Just enjoy our signings man. Because we haven’t solved every issue yet doesn’t mean we haven’t done some really good business. People really must have blocked out how shite our squad used to be.

Both of those fullbacks are playing every week at the moment. And it's only fans that are saying we want a DM because we think somehow standing a bloke in the middle of midfield will solve something. I need a break