Jump to content

timnufc22

Member
  • Posts

    1,447
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by timnufc22

  1. hows that ? we didn't have the money to provide what he wanted,he walked. why couldn't he cut his cloth like the every other manager has to ? how,-- gratuitous indulging in Keegan bashing, then he returns , we are good,= they are twats. come on you understand this. it doesn't matter who the person is i'll slag them off when they do something to be slagged off for and applaud accordingly when they deserve it. i'll not defend someone to the hilt without evidence especially if i know they have previous. Praise the lord, sense at last. What's Keegan done he should be slagged off for though? Yeah, yeah he should've stayed with a lopsided squad when his pleas were going unheard. - Walked out on Newcastle, had to be persuaded to return - Walked out on Newcastle again - Walked out on Fulham - Walked out on England - Walked out on Manchester City - Walked out on Newcastle again. Regardless of what he has achieved, we can't just ignore the above. Bloody hell, 'we cant just ignore the above'. He was at Man City for about 4yrs? His contract wasnt going to be renewed and things went flat, so club & Keegan both agreed to part company a few months before that. The club wasnt renewing his contract which was running out in a number of months time. Yet you put on 'walked out on Manchester City' to use as something against him. according to him his contract was going to be renewed but they wanted him to sign a longer one than he wanted. he said no so they said they would let him go at the end of his then it was mutually agreed he'd leave as he was a lame duck in that situation. he walked on fulham ? he left to take over the national managers job. that can hardly be described as walking away. Well you can when your trying to use something against him. Its just sad, obviously thers nowt wrong with questioning things like "should he have agreed to come with a DOF?", "maybe he could have fought things out in public", etc, and I understand those question marks against him.
  2. hows that ? we didn't have the money to provide what he wanted,he walked. why couldn't he cut his cloth like the every other manager has to ? how,-- gratuitous indulging in Keegan bashing, then he returns , we are good,= they are twats. come on you understand this. it doesn't matter who the person is i'll slag them off when they do something to be slagged off for and applaud accordingly when they deserve it. i'll not defend someone to the hilt without evidence especially if i know they have previous. Praise the lord, sense at last. What's Keegan done he should be slagged off for though? Yeah, yeah he should've stayed with a lopsided squad when his pleas were going unheard. - Walked out on Newcastle, had to be persuaded to return - Walked out on Newcastle again - Walked out on Fulham - Walked out on England - Walked out on Manchester City - Walked out on Newcastle again. Regardless of what he has achieved, we can't just ignore the above. Bloody hell, 'we cant just ignore the above'. He was at Man City for about 4yrs? His contract wasnt going to be renewed and things went flat, so club & Keegan both agreed to part company a few months before that. The club wasnt renewing his contract which was running out in a number of months time. Yet you put on 'walked out on Manchester City' to use as something against him.
  3. Exactly. What a disgrace I am, how dare I slag Keegan off saying something like that? I think he's refering to the genuine & smug piss-taking of him.
  4. Are you actually capable of putting a response together without calling those that disagree with you? I'm grown up, I don't call someone a 'mong' just because they disagree with me. The man is an absolute legend and has achieved more at this football club than some Newcastle managers can only dream of, doesn't mean I'm gonna roll over and hail the 'Messiah' because he abandoned us. He made mistakes, we all do. It's wrong to ignore his mistakes because of what he achieved. Oh, and for the record, I was gutted when Robson left and I haven't jumped on the Ranger band wagon so that blows that theory straight out the water. Nice try. well said. Some of the things said about KK are way over childish in the first place, provoking an arsey repsonse. Exactly, the genuine piss-taking out of him & smugness is cringe-worthy.
  5. I agree, this is from U V on toontastic: Target Sports Defect. Make it known that any true Newcastle supporter should not buy anything from his stores until he sells up. Set up pickets outside the shops (at least at first) to publicise it. At the very least stores in the North East should suffer if support for the club amongst the general population is anything like claimed. Use negative publicity about Sports Defect practices - they're probably no worse than anyone else, but a cheap tat merchant like that is bound to source a lot of it's merchandise from sweat shops, and treat it's staff poorly. If we make sure that Sports Defect are constantly associated with cheap child labour in poor conditions (it doesn't even have to be true), false sale promises, imply his goods are of a really poor quality, etc - over time it will have a negative affect on sales across the country.
  6. Get out of our cluuub Fat greedy bastard, get out of our club Fuck off Ashley! Fuck off Ashley! Fuck off Derek! Fuck off Derek! Basically.
  7. His interviews after Arsenal home (1-1), after Boro away (3-1) Spurs at home (6-1), Southampton at home (5-0), Chelsea FA Cup semi final, the game summed up the spirit he had created in the side even though we unluckly lost. Arsenal away (3-1) & Feyenoord away.
  8. Aye thats it, blown up picture of this http://img263.imageshack.us/i/llambiasinformation.jpg/ Cheers to people who tried & got a picture sorted out.
  9. How big? A4? 10ft across? bwt 4ft across, 6ft high, roughly something like that.
  10. Is anyone on here really good with photoshop, and able to make this picture OF Llambias: http://forums.icnewcastle.co.uk/viewtopic.php?t=20877&start=15 a bigger asize, to around 300 DPI?
  11. The FA How to contact The FA Thursday, 01 January, 2009 Please call the number that relates to your query. Fans View Line If you would like to register a comment or complaint on one of the game's current talking points or just want to get something off your chest, please use our Fans View Line. Your views will be reviewed, collated and then forwarded to the relevant departments within The FA. Tel: 020 7745 4999 ? thats all I can see or: http://www.thefa.com/TheFA/WhoWeAre/ContactUs.aspx
  12. Know any email address that everyone can swamp referring to this absolute farce?
  13. This will be about as useful as a chocolate fireguard. What we do will change nothing, if we do this it'll just make the players morale even lower. All we can do is get behind the lads and shout our lungs out. Fair point, it'd be about blendin the two. I dont think it would make him change his mind about anything, just could bring into focus more how badly he's killing the club at the moment. Theres nothing about it on skysports etc, zero scrunity about how this club is bieng ruined.
  14. .. to, if nothing else, bring more scrunity & attention (via media) to what Ashley is doing to the club? T-Shirts produced for everyone in the ground to wear?
  15. What a dickhead. Xisco treatment Enrique treatment Ameobi NEW 3 YR CONTRACT Ryan Taylor & over-weight Kevin Nolan 4 wins in 18 games or something like that I cant believe he can come out and say that crap, what a total twat, lost any respect for him now.
  16. Ask SBR about that, and the game against Wolves in 2004. How false can you get, what a shambles.
  17. FFS can you not get into prespective now how harmless Shepherd's Geordie Nation words are after the crap weve been through!! Bloody hell
  18. It's not based on what he says though. We know for a fact that Souness wanted Anelka and Boa Morte, Souness practically baited Anelka as best as he could through the media. It was also clear that Souness favoured the 4-3-3 system, and wanted Anelka/Morte for that system. As for the Owen bid, that was clearly entirely Shepherd, and I can't see it being any other way. He wanted a big name, big money, long term replacement for Shearer, he wanted the best England had to offer, so he went for Rooney first and foremost, and when that failed, he used the same funds a year later to sign Owen. Souness by that time had been told Anelka was a no-go as Fenerbahce had rejected our no-doubt derisory bid. It was compeltely obvious at the time what happened here without any need for Souness' eventual confirmation of the undermining that occurred. In the press conference Souness said, very smugly, 'when I walked into the Chairmans office and handed him a piece of paper with Michael Owen written on he nearly fell off his seat, but we've done it & got him, and I'm absolutely delighted. Only a few players in the world could replace Shearer and he's one of them'. Granted he might just be saying that, but it hardly looked like he was saying it through gritted teeth. Dont get me wrong I am suspicious about the Boa Morte/Anelka deals and why they didnt happen, what was Shepherd doing etc. Although I agree with Shepherd that everyone was chuffed when we signed him, we had already bought midfielders aswell to supply him.
  19. So you were impressed. Now what benefit did that bring the club? It sent a message out to the players that pathetic, unproffesional crap like that from Barton is unacceptable especially in the situation we were in. It showed theres a line you dont cross, and letting everyone down in that manner is crossing it. You can say all you like about performances, hiding, not showing etc, but that was such a massive 2 fingers up at his team mates, manager and fans. He was our best player that game until he made that stupid tackle, please don't make out he planned this just to be a t*** to everyone. No, what Im saying is he let his temper (for the millionth time) get to him and let that be put ahead of his team mates, fans and manager. His first game back, and his millionth chance, and he still does that. I agree he was our best player, but unfortunately it seems that a Joey Barton performance isnt without stupidy in amongst it, so in the end it was a terrible performance. I know what your saying, if I was manager I'd love to try and get inside his head and channel that aggression in a positive way. I'd say he needs to sort his head out as a person and come back to football.
  20. So you were impressed. Now what benefit did that bring the club? It sent a message out to the players that pathetic, unproffesional crap like that from Barton is unacceptable especially in the situation we were in. It showed theres a line you dont cross, and letting everyone down in that manner is crossing it. You can say all you like about performances, hiding, not showing etc, but that was such a massive 2 fingers up at his team mates, manager and fans.
  21. The quote in bold is yet another example of HTL's selective memory to suit his own agenda where he fails to remind us that Freddie Shepherd massively undermined SBR when he made it public in the summer of 2004 that 2004/05 would be Bobby's last season as manager at the club, and bearing in mind the "characters" we had at the club at that time the implications of Shepherd's decision were always going to be dyer, sorry dire. Chapter 20 of SBR's autobiography is entitled "Undermined" just to underline the point. IMO this is the most damning single example of Freddie Shepherd's mismanagement of the club, the fact is that we have never recovered from that decision, and is a major reason why I never want Shepherd in a position of authority at the club again. jimmymac Certain players are mainly at fault for the undermining of Robson. Why do you think the Board (and fans) began to question the ability of Robson to take the club any further, daft lad? I'd personally have Shepherd back, and I agree with a lot of what you say about him, but to be fair he did sell Gary Speed behind Robsons back, stupidly announced it was his last year, critisised some of his buys, and Robson basically says he wasnt supported much at that time before he was sacked.
  22. The defence is good, the rest of the team is pathetic and I hope this post is a wind-up Thats just a rough idea of a team - are you telling me you would not want Taarabt or De Ridder? Are they players who would be pathetic? Imo they'd blatently be good players to be in for, do you know we're in the championship? We need hungry younger players, Butt might actually be useful with legs around him at breaking up the play, though granted a proper replacement would be best.
×
×
  • Create New...