arnonel

I feel same way about Alvarez. Very unlikely, but man he is a talent. And cheap too

Frenkie and then Van de beek Job done

This would be huge. More huge than Trippier for me

I'd be very surprised we go over 50-60M

Very good but injury prone

We.need.all.the.positions

Maybe bring back Beardsley too

Also - separate note. Any ideas where I can get international football games extended highlights from? I am following Belgium, German etc teams

There used to be a list of other clubs forums. Anyone still have this?

Lunin linked (gk from real madrid)

Yup, and was France bound. Ticks the "out of contract soon" box

Linked with Azmoun. Striker from Zenit

There is just too much content to digest. I have been in this space for years, and still learning. If you dont get it, or think its all about DogeCoin/Elon, then I understand the scepticism. Just ask that you dont point fingers for things you do not understand. Rather go do some reading and then come back with a more compelling argument. As to my beliefs about taking control of my money and assets away from corrupt bankers. Those are my beliefs, and I dont use this to justify anything. Dont tell me what I can and cant believe. So many people believe in the decentralisation movement. I am one of them. Ill step away now before this debate degenerates even more. My point summarised: Blockchain/NFTS are good. NFTS in football can be good. I think the OP example feels like it could be bad.

Breaking the argument down a bit: Blockchain (decentralisation) as a category of technology is a really good thing You can build lots of stuff on blockchain, including crypto currencies and NFTs Digital Currency can be good and bad. Depends how you use it. Examples of good: Ripple/XRP. Examples of bad: DodgeCoin NFTs can be good and bad. Examples of good: Items you can purchase in games, or football tickets. Examples of bad: Cyberpunk Ultimately, it really depends how you use it. You cannot lump the entire space into the Dodecoin bucket. NFTs are a mechanism to prove ownership. This is good for various applications. Now, back to whether this is good for football. I think it can be, but I think the OP post feels dangerous, and possibly a bad example. I believe in the future it will have a lot of utility in football in a good way though.

One example : Bank of England

Time will tell. The pace of innovation in this space is staggering though. We will see many failures, but ultimately decentralisation is the future #FuckLateStageCapitalism

Not true at all Eg: do yourself a favour Google the digital pound

Listen, I'm not here to educate the masses. I've been in this space for years and I believe the web3 movement will be as big or bigger than web2. It's a pretty fundamental shift. And because it's still early and lacks regulation it will cause the dodge coin or crazy digital art auctions. Don't let that distract you from how much investment is going on. The game I mentioned above led the largest investment round in Europe. Just yesterday Visa announced a 1B$ acquisition of a ripple partner. Point fingers and laugh all you want. This ship is sailing

This shows misunderstanding of this space. NFTs can have a lot of utility, eg a ticket to football game could be an nft

Example:

In principal obviously

Was really hoping for some signings by now. Players need to be through the door early. The earlier the better.

Linked with Rusnak from MLS

That side is so bad. We need a completely new team. Shocking the state bruce/ashley left the club in

What annoys me is how every tackle he seems completely broken. Always hobbling around Still love him though