Jump to content

jdckelly

Member
  • Posts

    33,561
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by jdckelly

  1. Don't buy that for one second. Ashley would have to be moronic to let that get written into a contract, and after everything else he's had to already pay out (Allardyce, Keegan) he's not getting bit twice. worth pointing out Ashley is never the one to write the contracts agree terms etc, that would have been Llambias who did rather like Pardew.
  2. Who the fuck is McNair heard about him during the week, he's an u21 player but they have no choice all the other cbs are injured or suspended
  3. utterly insane, seemed to get every injury possible, wasn't that the season where harewood clattered Given who was out for most of the season?
  4. it might have been, right up until it was printed. Now you can be sure whatever happens Pardew won't be sacked just to piss off the press.
  5. thought so too. Weren't they one of the ones to run the 2 games to go story?
  6. http://www.theguardian.com/football/2014/sep/26/sepp-blatter-fifa-ban-third-party-ownership
  7. Gameweek 6: Liverpool 2 - 2 Everton Chelsea 2 - 0 Aston Villa Crystal Palace 1 - 2 Leicester Hull 0 - 2 Man City Man United 3 - 2 West Ham Southampton 3 - 0 QPR Sunderland 1 - 2 Swansea Arsenal 2 - 1 Tottenham West Brom 1 - 1 Burnley Stoke 0 - 0 Newcastle
  8. doesn't seem like it, Bruce denied the existence of any recall clause before the match and why would he bother signing a new deal here when he could probably get much better offers to go somewhere else on a free with the bonuses of larger wages and nice signing on fee. I met a Canal+ journalist in The Strawberry who'd just been interviewing Ben Arfa's agent on Saturday. There's a recall clause between 1st and 10th January, but it won't get activated if Pardew's still here, apparently. only going off what Bruce has rather publicly said and what reason has he to lie? If he's lying then it makes him look rather silly if he's doing well and said clause does get activated (of coarse the flip side is if he's not doing well and causing behind the scenes problems it makes bruce look smart if clause gets activated) and frankly even if it is true it really doesn't look like Pardews going anywhere.
  9. doesn't seem like it, Bruce denied the existence of any recall clause before the match and why would he bother signing a new deal here when he could probably get much better offers to go somewhere else on a free with the bonuses of larger wages and nice signing on fee.
  10. He writes such shit every week tbh, not surprised he's had a go at us this time round. It's amazing small minded drunks like him are getting paid to write for supposedly respectable nationals. not the first time either do remember reading in rage some of his pieces on nufc before the times paywall went up. Frankly I was happier having forgotten he existed
  11. 1 team (professional foul is only a 1 game ban)
  12. Seriously did they think that Man Utd defense was going to be good enough for a champions league challenge? You can't just expect to outscore everyone with that level of incompetence at the back. Also how bad were QPR last week by comparison
  13. I like this new fun man utd and their capacity for incompetence at the back
  14. tbf Hulls defenders are quite a bit better than Man Utds on all evidence provided thus far
  15. holy shit horrific from Blackett (I think) being so deep and keeping him onside
  16. I don't think that anything is obvious with Van Gaal. Mata has been our best player so far this season. It was bound to be 50/50 between RVP and Mata as to who played today. This must be Van Persies last chance to impress. I'm coming around to the idea that RVP has compromising pictures of Van Gaal personally
  17. jdckelly

    SackPardew.com

    the clubs infultrated here
  18. doubt it was leaked by the club more likely to just be from the voices in olivers head.
×
×
  • Create New...