Hanshithispantz

...meaning you'd shag him, right? Do you realy have to ask?

Got the body of a 55 year old house wife.

Wow

Quality

Ben Arfa, Tiote, Raylor in that order. Would have had Barton v Stevenage in there but it's not up for some reason.

I guess it's good he's honest, but that does reveal his total lack of tact and awareness of what he's saying. His use of hashtags really annoys me as well for some reason! And yeah, obviously he was doing something for charity here, just the "no-brainer" comment that is slightly unwise. Aye, although it is true (Liverpool over Newcastle would be a bit of a no-brainer for most players) it's completely unnecessary. He's supposed to be an Evertonian anyway, imagine Shearer saying that shit about Sunderland!

He's an honest lad, which is good, but I agree a bit like, he does need to shut up at times. EDIT: That been said, this was at a charity golf event.

Apparently the Redknap account is fake, I think he would have more than 10k followers tbh if he was real, and his bio seems pointlessly descriptive Born in 1973. Work with Sky Sports now, used to play Professional football with Bournemouth, Liverpool, Tottenham and Southampton.. also appearing for England

Richard__Buxton Richard Buxton @goliath377 People spreading rumours that Andy Carroll has been arrested when nothing of the sort has happened Fuck off Richard

Plenty of people argue that the influence of Sky has ruined football for proper fans, to be fair to the mackem mong. How has sky ruined football for 'proper fans'? And where are all of these middle class types at matches? If you cannot afford to go to the game it's not SKY's problem, I mean it's 'fairly' expensive, but it's hardly robbery, especialy in the North East (Sunderland in particular where a couple years back they were selling tickets for the derby at £25 a pop). The world has changed and football has changed with it, if it wasn;t SKY it would be somebody else. I'm not arguing on the substance of the point, I agree it's much more complicated than he's making it sound. I was just saying that he's not the first person I've heard make comments like that. Fair do's

Plenty of people argue that the influence of Sky has ruined football for proper fans, to be fair to the mackem mong. How has sky ruined football for 'proper fans'? And where are all of these middle class types at matches? If you cannot afford to go to the game it's not SKY's problem, I mean it's 'fairly' expensive, but it's hardly robbery, especialy in the North East (Sunderland in particular where a couple years back they were selling tickets for the derby at £25 a pop). The world has changed and football has changed with it, if it wasn;t SKY it would be somebody else.

Since when was football "sold to the middle classes"? Honestly man some of the shit they type is fucking deranged.

For all we know Marveaux could be another Routlege, and Jonas is quite clearly a much better player than Ferguson going into next season. We look a lot better with him in the squad than we do withought him.

Watching Henderson up against them Spanish lads was quite embaracing like.

It was apparently a "clean break" so he should be alright, mike ashley of all people wouldn;t give the lad a 5 year contract if there was a bif chance fo complications, i'd imagine.

Thank god for that, I was worried that he was struggling to walk around cones tbh

Vice Versa he's also a player who will camp on Dalglish's driveway to push through a move. Of course the reverse is true, but by all accounts he did some research and chose US, so if he is happy with us he's unlikely to want to shift, least not just for a change of scenery anyway. Aye, he left Lyon for Marsielle so I don't think it's just about playing for the bigger club with him, I just think he likes to be playing regular football. Aslong as he doesn't fall out with anyone I can see him staying. Thats what I hope anyway.

Vice Versa he's also a player who will camp on Dalglish's driveway to push through a move.

Looks like he struggled to do 3 keepy ups, the lads finished, sell.

Whats the meaning of pay as you play in your head? Every player would demand a basic salary. A significant amount would though be, as the deal says, payed if he plays. Nope the is no basic salary involved in it is better to check up the facts before you shoot the idea. How can the deal is pay as you play if there is a basic salary? If we only pay him when he plays I think he will be an awesome buy. Without being 100% sure im pretty confident that you're wrong about this. How i see it is that there will always be a low basic wage, but bonuses for apperances, goals ect. Hargreaves stock is so low due to injury how many are going to be willing to pay him a basic wage at all? A proper pay as you play deal would in fact have no basic and would be all based on appearances and other bonuses, if he starts demanding a basic wage it is no longer a pay as you play, its a proper contract just heavily incentive like apparently ours with Demba Ba. He'd probably just retire and move into some other role in football where he'll actualy get a wage tbh. Absolutely no way he'll risk working for free. Maybe he wants to play football, if he can? He's got millions anyway, its not like his family are going to go hungry. When a player gets older, football gets more important, certainly when they got enough money and a new contract wont make much of a difference of the quality of life he'll have in retirement. If he's injured he's not working, if he's fit and playing he's working. But playing football is what gets him injured, and if he's injured he's going to have to be working a lot harder than he will if he was playing on getting himself rehabilitated. In theorie it sounds a smashing idea, in reality I think he will want some form of basic wage for if and when he's not playing (I doubt he'll want to be tied down on a contract if he's not currently in the starting XI, meaning he's fit, sitting on the bench, but been payed nowt)

Whats the meaning of pay as you play in your head? Every player would demand a basic salary. A significant amount would though be, as the deal says, payed if he plays. Nope the is no basic salary involved in it is better to check up the facts before you shoot the idea. How can the deal is pay as you play if there is a basic salary? If we only pay him when he plays I think he will be an awesome buy. Without being 100% sure im pretty confident that you're wrong about this. How i see it is that there will always be a low basic wage, but bonuses for apperances, goals ect. Hargreaves stock is so low due to injury how many are going to be willing to pay him a basic wage at all? A proper pay as you play deal would in fact have no basic and would be all based on appearances and other bonuses, if he starts demanding a basic wage it is no longer a pay as you play, its a proper contract just heavily incentive like apparently ours with Demba Ba. He'd probably just retire and move into some other role in football where he'll actualy get a wage tbh. Absolutely no way he'll risk working for free.

Whats the meaning of pay as you play in your head? Every player would demand a basic salary. A significant amount would though be, as the deal says, payed if he plays. Nope the is no basic salary involved in it is better to check up the facts before you shoot the idea. How can the deal is pay as you play if there is a basic salary? If we only pay him when he plays I think he will be an awesome buy. Throw you're keyboard out the window man will you.

Aslong as both Barton and Cabaye do there fair share of grafting I cannot realy see them problem with them playing similar roles either side of Tiote (although i'm guessing Cabaye would be the deeper of the 2). Both are technicaly good and have an eye for a pass so they won't hinder us going forwards, it'll be like Xavi and Iniesta either side of Busquets man.

Why when he could have either just stayed at Porto or can get the Chelsea gig? Think he was referring to his name.... Ah right, whooosh!!!