loki679

We get every game live here with options to watch again later if you want for about £3 a month. That's through China Telecom IPTV which most people seem to have (anywhere even mildly built up, anyway). Maybe state owned monopolies aren't so bad after all

£12bn in revenue and the pay about £1.4bn a year for PL rights. They'll probably make that back through subscriptions and advertising revenue without too much difficulty.

BREAKING: Lee Charnley struggling to operate Argos store locator He has to monitor it for a few weeks first.

Wonder if this means we've got a deal for a striker lined up.

If we get £10m for Jack Colback then the English transfer market is well and truly fucked

Ian (freelance web guy iirc) -

Nobby for me, like. He had the sweetest right foot in the league and that was when Beckham was playing.

I've no choice. Going to see James play at Time Square that day also. Town will be mental. James off here? Not sure what's sadder. Me predicting someone would attempt that lame gag as I typed my post or someone actually making it. Must've been Born Of Frustration It's the NO way. Someone had to do it

Fucking slideshows, man. The bane of my online life

I've no choice. Going to see James play at Time Square that day also. Town will be mental. James off here?

i'm going to want the name of his solicitor like, just in case

I don't really see why it matters. Some wannabe club from down the road made up a nickname for themselves in a futile attempt to give themselves some kind of identity or relevance, just ignore it.

Maybe a promotion wage rise clause in his contract?

http://i.imgur.com/YxhCJAR.jpg

Nothing really wrong with it, it's just a bit dull. Guess we should be happy there's no stupid spikes or huge panels or other silly Puma ideas.

Works ok for me but uMatrix shows it's blocking 8 scripts and about 15 domains.

One possible problem with outgoings may be that they're on wages that far exceed their ability. The clubs who would be at a suitable level for them either can't or won't get close to what they're on here.

Wasn't he supposed to be available for £12m (or thereabouts)? In this market that seems to be a proper bargain now.

We definitely need to strengthen in central midfield. Hayden is still young and hasn't played PL football before, Shelvey might struggle at times with the pace and lack of space he'll get, Diame doesn't seem up to it and Colback is Colback. A couple of decent additions there and get rid of Diame and Colback and we'd look a lot better.

Possibly although the mention of 'retail price' implies that SD gets the 93% of what it goes for on the shelves. Another possibility I suppose is that SD takes the 93% then passes the 90% on to the supplier which leaves a split of 7% to Rangers and 3% to SD.

I find myself a little confused at the Rangers shirt sales deal mentioned there with 93% of the retail price going to SD. Ope shared a very interesting article earlier in which shirt deals were discussed and this was one of the snippets: So if the kit supplier is getting 90% of the shirt sale revenue, how is SD taking 93% of the retail price? They would seem to be mutually exclusive.

Nappies in English.

Aye, staggering. After all the great years of his ownership it's staggering that he might play the cunt. Staggering. Not sure what you're sarcastic post is all about, I meant from day one. Clearly didn't mean it as it was a surprise this summer. Not that I need to explain myself, but just a moron post. Aye, but you're getting better. Keep at it sonna

Aye, staggering. After all the great years of his ownership it's staggering that he might play the cunt. Staggering.