Jump to content

loki679

Member
  • Posts

    21,696
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by loki679

  1. The intro sequence on Chinese tv for football matches has each teams flag unfurling over either a local landmark or their ground. For us and Sunderland they've done both at once unfurling over a wing of the angel of the north each. Bloody scandalous
  2. loki679

    sunderland

    You can't really castigate someone for having an opinion on a player anyway. If he thinks Cattermole is better than Tiote then what does it matter? Does anyone really think he's gonna change his mind because of what they say?
  3. 10pm kick off, no work tomorrow, £3 for a bottle of brandy at the 7/11, looking forward to this
  4. loki679

    sunderland

    So you'll get banned for 2 days under that rule too now. Wait, so will I, this is getting confusing.
  5. loki679

    sunderland

    We never got to see his reply to brummie.
  6. loki679

    sunderland

    I don't know how you have the patience to even try and engage with these mongs, Sima.
  7. Great through ball from Scholes there.
  8. Flashbacks Drawing any of the French teams would be brilliant considering the makeup of our squad and our better profile over there.
  9. Is Abeid a DM? he could be worth a start if Colo is out.
  10. f*** me is this for real? You're actually comparing the two clubs in that way? New forum trend: Swansea are s***, Barca are good. And to think most of us would have been happy with a point before the match started. No, don't get me wrong, i'm not comparing them as teams, just the style of passing game they play and Barca were naturally the first ones that popped into my head. They both play a passing style of football but Swansea's passing seems to be more focused on keeping the ball away from the opposition than penetrating and scoring. You could compare them to many teams who play a passing game but a different kind of passing game. Maybe a comparison between the Arsenal invincibles and the Arsenal side of recent years might serve better. The invincibles played some lovely pass and move football but the passing had a penetrative purpose whereas in more recent times Arsenal have seemed to be passing it for the sake of it. Again, it's not a great comparison but I hope it illustrates the point a little.
  11. The difference between a team like swansea and a team like barca is that the barca passing has a purpose. They're probing and using the movement of both the ball and their own players to pull the other team around and create spaces to run into for the killer pass. Swansea on the other hand just seem to pass it for the sake of passing it, there was very little purpose in a lot of their passes except maybe to bump up their stats. What exactly is the point of one CB passing 10 yards to the other and then him passing it back straight away when there's no opposition player anywhere near them?
  12. loki679

    sunderland

    I'm just too easy-going. Giving him the benefit of the doubt. He's a mackem, it won't be the first benefit he's been given
  13. loki679

    sunderland

    http://www.readytogo.net/smb/showthread.php?t=689487
  14. If the mackems can get anything from Spurs tomorrow it could be on
  15. Santon's had a good game too I think. Looked quite assured on the ball and better defensively.
  16. For what? Scoring two superb goals? Saying we didnt come to play football, very negative tactics, he's very disappointed with our park the bus tactics. Talksport are just wumming as per. Gough and Durham are actually on our side, saying Pardew out-thought him tactically and we've come and done a job. Wonder if Hughes is a Swan, he seems very bitter.
  17. For what? Scoring two superb goals? Saying we didnt come to play football, very negative tactics, he's very disappointed with our park the bus tactics.
  18. loki679

    sunderland

    classy, 5,520 ;D
  19. Ok, they've blamed almost everyone except tomato sucking a lemon face, at some point they must realise the problem, right?
  20. loki679

    sunderland

    Google reckons 107,000 site:www.readytogo.net "f*** off" 78,800 here, mind NETD FTM Hah, nice, mag to mackem is 81,700 vs 11,600
  21. loki679

    sunderland

    Is there any way to find out how many times the phrase 'fuck off' has been used on that site.
  22. Can't even hit the target when he's aiming for the goalkeeper's arm.
×
×
  • Create New...