Hhtoon

He was asked.

Direct trace back to mama Botman IMO

Entered maybe 6 ballots and got my first success for West Ham with my 8 year old. He's only ever experienced Watford home games so hoping for him to be properly awestruck

Oh no, bad news...quick, to the blame-copter!!

I remember when Liverpool and Arsenal wanted Klopp and Arteta gone after bad seasons. Don't lets turn into Chelsea fans.

Livra told Botman to get a man and he got caught between the 2. Was just shite overall.

He got stuck with 2 men to be fair

Don't we have to pay him whilst he's on gardening leave?

Before or after the "Chelsea" loophole was closed, and they restricted contract length to 5 years for FFP? Edit - that's a genuine Q by the way as I'd be surprised if that wasn't dealt with at the same time...

Great, let's give everyone new 10 year contracts as soon as they sign and spread out that FFP! Yeah, that isn't right.

To be fair, the original point was how would a loan benefit us, and my answer was predicated on us being on target for 3 years ending 2024. On that basis it is true and I'm sure it is tight, and frankly no one has any clue where we'll end up, BUT, if they have forecasted (and they'll be revisiting on a monthly basis for several different scenarios) that we'll be OK as is, then might as well take the revenue to benefit 2025, 2026 AND 2027, not just 2 years.

Only useful if they want to spend now. If they dont want to, it is unnecessary for the 3 year rolling period ending 2024 as by all accounts we're good. Might as well then have the benefit in years 2025, 2026, 2027.

Yes, but if we don't need the benefit in this 3rd season of a rolling 3 year period, we may as well get in the 3 next sets of rolling seasons. So if we got a fee now, it would feature as the 3rd year of the season ending 2024...and by all accounts we're ok so would be "unnecessary" profit in that 3 years. By deferring to August, would you get the benefit in: year 3 of 3 year period ending 2025 Year 2 of 3 year period ending 2026 Year 3 of3 year period ending 2027 I think

Defers revenue to next year maybe? If we're not buying anyone and have nailed FFP for the last 3 years, then there is no benefit to additional revenue in this period.

Some of our fans didn't deserve Champions league. Was clearly ahead of any targets last year and the squad has struggled as a result of the increased games (plus Tonali and Barnes unforeseen circumstances). Yeah it's messed this season up a bit, but fuck me I enjoyed it

Squeezing a bit of Disney in whilst he's there https://www.instagram.com/p/C2LdmQYt4pE/?igsh=dmxmbmJ2cTNxZzQ=

Foul or not (he was holding Isaks shirt which for me is always a foul) surely Isak out-muscled Ballard to the point he fell over as he couldn't hold him back

Apart from the odd spell we were pretty grim today and some of the basics just weren't there. We're extremely easy to play through and very weak when teams counter (NFFC really highlighted this and continued today). I'm not particularly upset about it in the overall scheme of the project/team (I'll avoid all other football content for a day or so as per usual when we lose ) and appreciate we still have work to do - Howe certainly has some areas he needs to focus on but love him and the team. I feel we're still in the early phases of setting the foundations and need another season or 2 to build up the squad to compete. Last year set some high expectations but I always thought this season would be a struggle. Hall doesn't seem to be fully trusted and these "misses" in the transfer windows hit us hard compared to other teams who have had years to build a proper squad. Fucking hate losing to Liverpool mind you, especially like that

I'm sure he has to the club and Howe etc. I don't particularly feel the need for a PR driven open letter to us fans but I wouldn't be surprised if one pops up at some point.

Diaz hands all over the Luton defender to climb above him....no other way to jump and happens every single game. JLs looks worse as Gabriel was already bending/on the way down so hands were on his back. Its just not THAT contentious a decision...

Nice balanced view ignoring all the controversy.. https://vm.tiktok.com/ZGJoYGwfS/

Already said in the match thread that I reckon the punch was fair considering the wet conditions and was coming into a crowd. However, having watched it back the ball ends up near Bruno, Gordon and the Wolves player. Gordon seemingly sets off leaving/hoping Bruno wins it back and we'd have been 3 on 3 on the break. I reckon it was something we work on and unfortunately didn't come off but no way should they have been scoring from it and that was nothing to do with Pope. I am a Pope fan mind you

I think the Pope punch criticism is a bit OTT. He had to come in to a crowd and it was absolutely tanking it so he probably thought trying to catch was a bit risky...you saw their keeper spill one for our 1st. Was a decent punch that cleared the area and then absolutely shite defending by 4 players to allow them to score.

Look at how much Lascelles has improved just from training/coaching whilst not playing competitively. Would be a huge deal if Tonali can continue training...

Damn, his English at 10 is better than it is now!