triggs

Pics or gtfo

Merked

Tony Pulls just buying all the centre halves

GW4 Newcastle 1-2 Arsenal Villa 3-1 Sunderland Bournemouth 2-2 Leicester Chelsea 2-1 Palace Liverpool 1-0 West Ham Man City 4-1 Watford Stoke 1-1 WBA Spurs 1-1 Everton Southampton 2-0 Norwich Swansea 2-1 Man Utd

I'd be very happy with that, but I doubt it'll happen. Especially given the opposition. Perhaps if we were against a lesser team we'd consider going a little more attacking with that CM partnership. (technically I'd dump Sissoko for SDJ, but I'd be content with either) Why would you drop Sissoko for De Jong like?

Could see Dortmund winning the EL and Bayern will probably get to at least a CL semi I would imagine

Because coming on as a sub the other team is tired and there is more space, thus fast players or players who need space are often better coming on as a sub

That's the data. You really do buy it every single time. I'm getting bored. Process will continue this weekend with a 1-0 win away to Swansea. I'm not so sure, Swansea are the best team we've played thus far and by some way too. Ha! Well they could put the ball in the net so aye. Reckon it'll be tight like. 0-0 or 0-1. If only putting the ball in the net wasn't so important eh?

Well why should a team like Southampton or Everton have to share the burden of coefficients in a shit competition which is overlooked by the UEFA, has an unfair format with potentially great travelling distances to ex-Soviet states and with very low financial return to help the big 4/5 who will end up poaching your own players ? Because they want to win something which is what football is about (not that I think those teams are good enough to win it anyway)

Didn't Southampton put out a decent side but couldn't get the job done?

Ander Bastian

If Mitrovic is against this fucking nugget. Is it a necessity to come through Southampton's academy that you have to look like a smug cunt? http://assets2.lfcimages.com/uploads/0100__3819__a_lallana_10_800X480.jpg http://i.ytimg.com/vi/BlYEEKGCAIU/maxresdefault.jpg http://images.dailystar.co.uk/dynamic/58/photos/344000/82344.jpg I prefer Liverpool's approach http://cdn.images.express.co.uk/img/dynamic/67/285x214/261598_1.jpg http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/02396/Gerrard16_2396532b.jpg

Christ Astanashing. I'll feel terrible for this tomorrow, but that's quite good. Stifler, man. That's mainly why I gave him the Gets so much abuse he deserved the praise for that one

That literally doesn't matter though. For a club like Manchester City, the only relevant question is: does this player make them better? In the case of both Sterling and de Bruyne, the answer of course is yes.

Neil didn't even play the first week and he is beating most people, including me

Interesting to see how he'd do if played as a striker in the Championship

You could obviously never say he hides like. There were times when he played with Cabaye in the middle where he would be demanding the ball in the middle while Cabaye was very passive beside him

Christ Astanashing.

I said Kemen should be given a chance before the game. Also, I doubt the France u19 captain is going to be worse than Gouffran in centre mid

I'm not sure about it being a s*** move for his career. He could start for them it's a terrible career move for him Don't know how you can say that with such certainty. It could be but there's also a good chance it's the best decision he'll ever make Not even sure players give a f*** about how their "career" is perceived all that much anymore or developing into being better players who play 40-50 games a season. I'm sure some do but, just like for example Sterling, the majority just want to play for a CL team and make a s*** ton of money and anything else can go f*** itself. If a City or a Chelsea want a player, they usually end up there. Scott Sinclair, an average to decent player by most standards played for both. I doubt he cares that his career isn't up to much as a result, he made his cash and played for some big teams. In Stones' case, it would have been nice to see him stay and develop at Everton but as usual, once one of the big 4 come in, it's just a matter of time. Football's a bit f***ed tbh. Hate Chelsea, they're such a scruffy shithouse club, charvas who won the lottery 12 years ago. Maybe Everton are pleased at getting 13 times their dosh back too. Who the f*** knows, it's just a bit depressingly predictable to see it happen. Even as a footballing decision I don't know how anybody can say that Sterling's decision to go to City was the wrong one. He's going to play every game for a team that has a very good chance of winning the league. That move is just common sense on all levels Don't know about right or wrong so much as it's depressing as a fan of any but 2-3 clubs that you have no hope to hold onto any player anymore. I don't even know how much City wanted the player so much as they just decided they were going to have him and that's that. They have any amount of money to spend and no cunt is holding onto anyone they fancy. From the player's perspective, I don't see the harm in developing at Liverpool for another year or two at least. As a club, they piss on Man fucking City for the better part of the last 60 years. I mean, who can't get by on 100 grand a week for a bit, no had to have the 200 grand a week. Got to have everything yesterday. I'm rambling, just find it depressing. The kid's 20 ffs, players used to get their big move in their mid 20's once they'd really proven themselves and done something in the game. Now you just need to look canny for a few games here or there and you cost as much as Zidane. It's just human nature to want to play for the best teams and win trophies no matter what she you are. I would maybe see the point if he was a scouser and Liverpool had brought him through from when he was a lad but they poached him from QPR in the first place

Nice post

I'm not sure about it being a s*** move for his career. He could start for them it's a terrible career move for him Don't know how you can say that with such certainty. It could be but there's also a good chance it's the best decision he'll ever make Not even sure players give a f*** about how their "career" is perceived all that much anymore or developing into being better players who play 40-50 games a season. I'm sure some do but, just like for example Sterling, the majority just want to play for a CL team and make a s*** ton of money and anything else can go f*** itself. If a City or a Chelsea want a player, they usually end up there. Scott Sinclair, an average to decent player by most standards played for both. I doubt he cares that his career isn't up to much as a result, he made his cash and played for some big teams. In Stones' case, it would have been nice to see him stay and develop at Everton but as usual, once one of the big 4 come in, it's just a matter of time. Football's a bit fucked tbh. Hate Chelsea, they're such a scruffy shithouse club, charvas who won the lottery 12 years ago. Maybe Everton are pleased at getting 13 times their dosh back too. Who the fuck knows, it's just a bit depressingly predictable to see it happen. Even as a footballing decision I don't know how anybody can say that Sterling's decision to go to City was the wrong one. He's going to play every game for a team that has a very good chance of winning the league. That move is just common sense on all levels

Not sure but he's got a decent amount of game time for a guy with no pre season

There was no reason not to play him ahead of Gouffran. He should go because he's obviously not going to get a chance here

Sissoko isn't better, like. Nowhere near. Sissoko is so underrated by some. I'd class Sissoko as our best player, above Wijnaldum as well. He's played a game and a half this season and was probably our best player against Southampton and the first half against Swansea(not much competition there mind)