r0cafella

It's an absurd situation if we take what Romano saying as the which would be roughly mocked if it wasn't a cartel club. So they are making an offer but they aren't making an offer and the offer is only an offer if your willing to sell to us at this none offer price?

They have 10%, not sure if it's of the total or profit though.

Two issues though Frogman. You outwardly want rid of Garnacho and right or wrong Garnacho seems to have an issues with his attitude

He takes money from anyone

Oh I love it when the petty insults come out.

You think the fair market value metric is based on public opinion? It's important to remember we won't getting outlandish fees for them, the bench mark will be set against fees we can command from clubs other than PIF owned ones.

Whoever said it knew they were talking to a NUFC fan

I'm curious as to what you base it on.

Personally not keen on the engagement farming particular from Romano but it's quite clear they are trying their luck and testing our resolve. If it does happen we've sanctioned it ultimately, I know who I'll be blaming either way.

You have what seems like an extremely high opinion of ownership.

Not at 120 it doesn't.

They wanted to, believe me. The issue they had is they couldn't be seen to push him out hence why they left it to him. And don't worry, our wonderful owners will pony up next summer and fund them, it's just what they do.

The athletic have reposted the nonsense article from earlier. Enjoy laughing at this excerpt. So we value Yamal at £200m, whereas Isak would be closer to £100m. As an attacker, we tend to see scoring rates peak at around 25 or 26. It’s not like what it used to be in the days of Michael Owen, where players would fall off a cliff in their late twenties, and we might expect someone like Isak with a reasonably good injury record to sustain form into the future — but he’s not a real upstart any more.” These factors mean that Isak’s value — around £100m, by consensus — might be affordable to some clubs. But the transfer landscape and Newcastle’s resolve means that his price — possibly over £150m — is borderline unreachable

Real have who upfront? The guy who doesn't want to play centrally? When has Barca being broke stopped them? Kane is old. Options exist and regardless of that, we shouldn't be selling to anyone in this country.

I think 60m is obviously on the ambitious side. But then again we've seen many daft fees paid for players who are average but hyped. Froggy and many Manchester United fans were definitely very confident about being able to shift players though ill give you that. Plenty of time left in the window mins, let's see how things play out.

40m is still plenty and plus when has a player who's been frozen out ever stopped buying clubs?

You laugh but prices are kind of mad, wouldn't be shocked to see them get 50m for him. It's actually a sobering reminder of much more we need to do with the academy.

Yeah I think it's a reach, he's a player we've tracked for a long time and we love returning for a old target. If we try and sign him and he goes to Liverpool I'm struggling to see the win? I'm over the Mike Ashley years of celebrating keeping our players

Like we did with João Pedro? It's a reach imo.

It would be inexcusable to be frank. If he wants to leave its fine however it needs to be abroad.

He's 29 and obviously won't be cheap. He's bad business basically.

Absolutely desperate for that engagement. Even Waugh would be ashamed of such a none update.

Theyve been expecting clubs to fall over themselves for Nunez who flopped and Diaz who they definitely do not want to sell yet want to sell. They must also be shocked no takes have come forward for Elliot for the small fee of 50m

We will have ticked off another year of Amortization next year as well.

Need Eddie to get on the phone with Hughes and tell him to fuck off.