Jump to content

Shadow Puppets

Member
  • Posts

    3,150
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Shadow Puppets

  1. It really depends on your outlook. Maxi, Miggy and Fraser are a pretty rapid set of options out wide. If we can add a Cornet or (hopefully) Diaby, then that would be perfect, but I think adding someone of Maddison’s quality would be game changing. All of a sudden out midfield three is on par with most of the best teams in the league.
  2. He comes across as a tool the same way that Craig Bellamy did. Pain in the arse to opposition fans, but amazing if he’s yours.
  3. There aren’t many higher than him in the PL for output, and if there were they’d be £70m plus.
  4. He would be a game changing signing. Very classy player, and scores goals. Also a bit of a prick, which we need in our side in my opinion. There wouldn't be many midfield trios in the PL better than... Maddison Joelinton Bruno
  5. Just don’t see the attraction in those kinds of women at all. A fake plastic life.
  6. I think he's fucking hilarious, me! ?
  7. Stop being such a fanny man. It’s done. When they say formalities they usually are referring to paperwork. It’ll be work permit or similar.
  8. Shame, but like mentioned above, Raphina and Diaby are more exciting to me anyway.
  9. Aye… it’ll be much closer to the lower end of those estimates (or below). Source: I work with several decent sized YouTube channels as part of my job, and unless you’re pulling in several hundred thousand views per video, with daily videos, you’re barely covering your costs.
  10. I agree with your sentiment, but he’s making no money like. Perhaps a couple of hundred quid a month, max, from YouTube.
  11. Bailey got a lot right in January, to be fair.
  12. Shadow Puppets

    Nick Pope

    To battle it out with Dubs, that's a good signing. Massive upgrade on Darlow.
  13. I don’t know. I’ve watched it another few times and I still can’t decide. It still looks to me like he flicks his leg back BEFORE any contact is made.
  14. He does dive though? And it’s debatable whether there is actually any significant contact at all.
  15. Haha. I agree from one angle it looks like contact, but the other 2 angles don’t. And to me it looks like the Hudds player massively overemphasises the flick back of his leg. As Mike said before, perhaps it’s BOTH a penalty and a dive ?
  16. Surely the fact that we’re even debating it means that it’s not a clear and obvious error on the refs part. I’ve watched it 10 times now and I still can’t decide for sure whether it was or wasn’t.
  17. That second one is definitely a penalty though!
  18. The angle from behind the Hudds player looks like there is. The other two angles show that he flicks his leg away just before any contact. IMO.
  19. Nope. You’re wrong I’m afraid ?
  20. There was zero contact. Watch it again from a different angle.
  21. He doesn’t touch him. One angle it looks like he does, but every other angle you can clearly see the Huddersfield player flick his leg back just before he’s clipped.
  22. Nope. Didn’t touch him at all.
×
×
  • Create New...