Joey Linton

Of course not, but I fully expect we'll get around those too.

Nah, that's people given up time and money for that like. Not on at all. If it's as they've set it out obviously.

I mean, we literally "got away with" the takeover, but aye OK.

In all seriousness that's absolutely shocking IF it's all true.

Wembo are mags. Marra.

He's a better keeper than Henderson certainly.

Everton are still in massive trouble next year.

Fear for their future if they get relegated so would rather Everton or Leeds went down. At the same time though, it can't be ignored what the current rules saw their takeover blindly waved through, but that's not the supporters' fault.

Also, well played Luke

We'll easy find something else.

At the time in the ground when they broke I never fancied them to finish it because Murphy was involved.

His versatility was really useful when we weren't allowed to sign cover for various positions under Ashley and there's definitely players you'd move on before him, but you'd like to think we'll let him go with our best wishes.

Thanks I will do. My other complaint is that I'd actually like to see Owen who is presumably making money from this explain it to people.

Thanks. I get the idea of the number of specific players in a particular online game. What I don't get is the stuff that John Terry was punting and even more the concept that Owen was doing the same with, where you acquire something then it essentially has no value unless someone is willing to give you a profit on it. Then to them it has no value until someone else is willing to do the same. Just seems like an easy way of parting a fool from their money.

There'll be genuine disappointment amongst the national media that we don't appear to be heading to Saudi Arabia.

Fortunately no transfer fee spent when we signed him so overall its not that bad, but he's going to take some shifting on that money. Edit : also Ryder saying Howe "has a decision to make", I think he's probably already decided Lee.

Agree on the Hurst stuff, for a start he isn't in charge. That seems to be forgotten constantly. On the rest of it though, 4 months is way too long, especially without any formal update. It's being given to charities ffs. How much scrutiny do they need to be under?

Reads like a competitive tender invitation ffs. Awful.

In all seriousness I think you pick your charity or charities and donate. Pick three, pick five, pick ten, - they'll all be worthy causes. Talk of finding the 'right' ones is frankly awful. And you certainly don't take four months to do it.

Four months?

Mag behaviour.

Admirable. Not sure I could show the same restraint. I do remember them all laughing their tits off about one of our fans going to London on the promise of a ticket that one of theirs pretended he had for him.

Which part of you doesn't want to?

:lol:

Like people (a) aren't paying enough for a ticket and (b) there isn't a cost of living crisis. Classic Tory. Speaking of the cost of living crisis, any update on those charity donations being made yet @Gregso that the charities can use them to help those in need?