Jump to content

et tu brute

Member
  • Posts

    7,069
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by et tu brute

  1. Should have used the photo a few seconds later when Bruno was right in his face.
  2. et tu brute

    7th-ometer

    You haven't obviously been taken much notice of what the owners have been saying about their ambitions then.
  3. We are scouting for cheaper gems (however so are every club), but ignore what Howe says in the press conferences as he's been saying it since day one (it's not stopped us so far) and it's been done purposely so that other clubs will not have our eyes out. If there is a player available at the price the club value him at, then the deal will be done.
  4. Or he could of stayed here thinking if Pope had a blip I'll get back in.
  5. Give over man, he got fuck all game time at Man Utd and served him right. He wanted to sit on the bench for Man Utd rather than fight for his place here, as I said fuck him
  6. He needs to be sent out again, don't want him anywhere near the club to be honest
  7. Can't see any of them being able to afford his 40 million valuation
  8. Must admit with the height we have for set pieces and the quality of delivery Trippier (usually) has, it is a bit of a puzzler how we don't have that many headed goals, especially from the defenders. We usually tower over other teams at set pieces in terms of overall height.
  9. et tu brute

    7th-ometer

    Yeah totally agree, we've had Bournemouth twice and Palace twice doing the same thing.
  10. I would be surprised with the position we're in if it is not now getting CL. The revenue through sponsorship and commercial opportunities will not only increase quite significantly (compared to non CL qualification), but also will sail through any PL scrutiny.
  11. Agree with all that and you can add for his size, the amount of times he beats the defender in the air is laughable.
  12. Not expecting anything especially with our record down there, but I do think we will give them a touch test. We bullied them up here so they will still be smarting from that I'd imagine.
  13. Top strikers would have chipoed the ball over him or possibly took it around him. As I said I disagree, I also thought the one from Schar, that although it was still a decent save it was pretty much straight at him and let's not forget he put one over the bar from a great position at the start of the second half. We're not going to agree, so I'll leave it there.
  14. He might be doing his usual bullshit show during the press conferences, but I'm certain he will have identified and agreed with Ashworth/Owners what is required to take the next step.
  15. I agree with Longstaff, Joelington and you can add Schar also. Wood I totally disagree with you as I thought he was abysmal. Still maintain if Wilson is on the pitch we have two goals with those chances. Wood offers nothing whilst even if Wilson has a quiet game he only needs one chance to make the difference. Agree to disagree though.
  16. Leeds were hunting him in packs nearly all game and he was getting no support from Longstaff during the game
  17. Wilson would have scored that chance and not fucked up first half when all he had to do was play the ball across. I honestly can't understand how you can come to the conclusion he was fine mind.
  18. That's another reason we need that type also as we do need additional goals from midfield. We struggle with teams at home in these type of games. I'm pretty confident that we will bring in one or two this window (hopefully early on).
  19. Should have taken Wood off at half time and Longstaff off not Willock. It's hard to have a go though. We need a Maddison type to open up these teams at home.
  20. 6.5 for Wood he was absolutely shocking. More like a 2
  21. Honestly he needs replaced as a first team starter. He should have been taken off not Willock.
×
×
  • Create New...