-
Posts
7,069 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by et tu brute
-
PCP are for sure, which could be one of the reasons they have went down this route. As for Maguire, he didn't correct them on that point, so maybe he has inside information.
-
Mind Kiernan Maquire was indicating that split for money going in was correct snd he give an example of how that would work also. Can't obviously comment on your business workings, but he's the football finance expert.
-
Kieran Maguire stated this was the case just now on the Loaded Mag YouTube channel.
-
The fact he has had 3 or 4 accounts now with the same agenda, tells you everything you need to know.
-
PCP shares will be diluted within the next couple of years, AS has already suggested this.
-
Or Bradford and Accrington.
-
He was still wrong though as the drop ball should have been ours
-
Bradford also, it's going to be years (cup draw apart) until we play these fuckers again. At least Exile can keep adding his daily numbers (even though I'm convinced he's not even a mackem fan).
-
So even his fellow journalists hate the bald cunt
-
Conveniently forgetting that before Ashley give those tickets away, the actual average attendance was just over 46,000. Over the last 50 years, it (46,000) is still bigger than the season averages they have had, except for 2 seasons.
-
For every game also
-
Mainly spending their smallish budget on players who were with them last season.
-
I wonder if his PhD son has an opinion on that
-
Don't need to say anything on the journalists now, as it's pretty obvious for everyone
-
Understand that, but if you do pay 100 million up front for those 10 players, then you will fall foul of FFP within the 3 year period with our current revenue streams. I get the amortisation of players fees and contracts. You're right about leaving it for another possible thread, I think that's a good idea.
-
The bald cunt is purposely trying to wind up the fans against the owners there with that tweet.
-
Nope I'm just quoting your stupid statement that it doesn't matter if we buy players for 100 million up front. I know fine well about asset amortisation for accounts.
-
So are you trying to say if we buy 10 players per say at 100 million up front under our current revenue streams, that we wouldn't fall foul of FFP? I don't think so.
-
What like Everton Go and try and wind someone else up.
-
Nope that's the best way currently to structure deals under FFP to give more scope, whilst we keep working on the sponsorship/commercial deals. I honestly can't understand why people are not waiting until the transfer window closes. That's the time to give sensible opinions and analysis. Everyone is just guessing at the moment.
-
I know that, I was just imaginging you typing that all out
-
Fuck I hope you copied that
-
Aye you're right there mind.