Jump to content

Fantail Breeze

Member
  • Posts

    5,953
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Fantail Breeze

  1. 4 minutes ago, et tu brute said:


    he seemingly mentioned it on the pre recorded show before the release though. I think he’s a knob, but seemingly he did have the story before it was released publicly.

     

    Kennedy would’ve had a copy of the statement and probably told him.

     

    As the club released it at exactly the same time as Sky it’s likely they released it to the media until a time embargo.

     

    He’s full of shit though :lol: that screenshot of ‘the club’ phoning him. Jesus wept.

  2. 36 minutes ago, gdm said:

    Did he fuck get a call for the club :lol:


    he shared a screenshot of his phone ringing and had the number saved as ‘the club’ on his phone. 

    looks like he’s deleted it and no wonder are we supposed to believe he’s in the middle of doing a podcast and the club phones him and before he answers it he takes a screenshot.

     

    what a fuckin roaster 

     

     

     

     

     

    He tweeted last night about ‘being told’ Sky are releasing a story at 8pm at 8.02pm after Sky had already posted the story :lol: 

     

    The bloke is an utter fantasist. 

  3. Good statement but I sincerely hope it’s going to be followed up by further action.

     

    I’m not asking then to chain themselves to the PL HQ. But there needs to be intense and relentless pressure put on the Government and the PL at this ideal time.

     

    Ashley has loaded the cannons and they need to be fired. Regardless of my thoughts on Ashley or the potential of this going through, we should all be doing anything we can to force the PL’s hand.

  4. 2 minutes ago, Jackie Broon said:

     

    I thought that on first view but I think it can be interpreted either way.


    Particularly with it saying "that too should be held in confidential arbitration", the CAT claim is not arbitration.

     

    What I think it is most likely actually saying is that the PL are trying to prevent the CAT case, which would be public, from going ahead arguing that should be dealt with under the arbitration instead.

     

    That suggests to me that the PL's jurisdiction challenge is still yet to be decided.

     

    That’s how I interpreted it too.

  5. 2 minutes ago, PlymouthGeordie said:

     

    I think it means the opposite. Basically puts pressure on the PL to make it public. If they don't, it indicates they may well be hiding something.

     

    So what if they are? Unless the club can get a victory through arbitration or CAT, it’s not going to matter what they’re hiding from the public eye.

     

    This shows the PL are holding the cards and we’re desperately trying to change that by throwing everything we can at them.

     

    It clearly asks for fan (and other) pressure and hopefully something can be organsied to put that pressure on. Wonder if the Trust could come out of hiding?

  6. 30 minutes ago, nbthree3 said:

    It's the fans who don't question these rumours that saddens me, just being strung along by each one that inevitably falls to pieces. And itk accounts are the most deceiving of the lot, trying to pass information off as a genuine insider for a following and support, but really they're creating more division in the Twitter community and fuels more and more arguments on hearsay and speculation

     

    You’re not allowed to do that on here mind!

×
×
  • Create New...