Erikse

Shelvey, but yeah.. Shelvey was more about Forest being nuts. Oh, and Kelly ofcourse, but also that one was about Juve being nuts.

Some Liverpool fans are really questioning this one, because it's difficult to fit both him and Ekitike on the field at the same time. It's awkward to spend more than 200m on 2 players and then not being able to play them together, unless you play Ekitike at LW or something like that. It makes you wonder whether they are really planning to go for Isak or not.

I bet some Saudi club will now assist City by putting in a massive bid for Ederson..

Wish we were a bit more creative and managed to find some lesser known players. Risky yes, but so is going for players who every top club know everything about.

They are pretty good at sobering us after watching the "best moments" videos.

They might sub him when he runs out of gas at the end of games. We couldn't, even when he was near useless at the end.

Wouldn't be surprised if he would be less injured elsewhere. We demand a lot from our striker. Obviously the top clubs would be able to sub him out when necessary aswell. Doesn't change the fact that his injuries were a problem for us at times, mind.

As I said I see the problem with wage structure. I just didn't know what you meant by "literally".

Around £15,7m per year? I understand the problems with the wage structure inside the club. Technically speaking I think we can afford it. Problem would ofcourse be what we would then need to offer other players.

Still don't understand the urge to buy Ekitike now if they are still after Isak. It just makes us less willing to sell.

Stealing "Isaks replacement" (media words) from us doesn't exactly seem like a smart move if they were still hoping to maybe lure him from us, especially when getting Isak was already so difficult for them in the first place. Clearly they gave up on Isak?

They said we overpayed for Isak at 65 mill or whatever it was..

So if they were getting Isak and Ekitike for 200m euros as someone said, that means Isak now costs 110m euros?

Allways wanted to play for them. Dreamt about it.

Not sure if I misunderstand you or the other way around. I thought we were jokingly talking about us selling Isak to Al Hilal for 30m, with the Saudis actually just using us.

Worst part about that is that the Premier League would happily let that happen, the "fair market value" probably won't work both ways for us.

Revisit this one when you see the Wirtz ACL.

They probably just want to threaten us, like "if you don't sell us Isak then we need to go for Ekitike"..

They're going to do a swap deal with Frankfurt, no doubt.

I was thinking the same. How much will we have left if we do this one? It can give us both cover for Isak and cover in midfield, though (and by that I don't mean that he will be a bench player). It's kind of solving 2 problems in 1 signing.

Yeah, I have no clue to be honest.

Frankfurt really paid PSG like 20m euros for this guy last year?

Thank god Gordon and Schar/Trippier didn't do this.

Finally one of these that didn't make me cringe.