Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The classic Freddie Shepherd lurch from one extreme to the next.

 

I'd say this was a pretty logical appointment for where we were at the time tbh. Certainly made more sense than most of his other ideas.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The classic Freddie Shepherd lurch from one extreme to the next.

 

I'd say this was a pretty logical appointment for where we were at the time tbh. Certainly made more sense than most of his other ideas.

 

You're right there. I can't remember whether I was a pro/against the decision but on the face of it the decision made sense however I think the majority of supporters he would evolve with the additional resources he had to hand rather than morphing us in to Bolton mkII.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I remember the forum, generally, receiving the appointment quite favourably (my memory being lots of avatars of him popping up - including JH's of Fat Sam in shades outside SJP?). I didn't want him, personally - but I've been wrong about many other things (eg. I thought Jonas would be huge for us).

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I was pro the appointment as we needed organising after the shambles of Souness and Roeder.  I thought he would bring some decent cheap players in and start rebuilding.  Obvisouly Ashley took over and didn't give him any money to spend and his football was minging.  I was still annoyed when he was sacked in Jan.  Thought they should have just seen the season out with him and made a fresh start.

 

I remember the press conference, he was going tomeet Ashley and Mort to discuss players...ened up sacked.  :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The classic Freddie Shepherd lurch from one extreme to the next.

 

I'd say this was a pretty logical appointment for where we were at the time tbh. Certainly made more sense than most of his other ideas.

 

You're right there. I can't remember whether I was a pro/against the decision but on the face of it the decision made sense however I think the majority of supporters he would evolve with the additional resources he had to hand rather than morphing us in to Bolton mkII.

 

Massively, as that's what he always said in the press and for some reason it seemed believable at the time.  Also we looked an amateur outfit under Glenn Roeder, lots of injuries and often looking ill-prepared for games which appeared to be in stark contrast to Allardyce's meticulous approach with his army of nutritionists, physiotherapists, psychologists, etc.  Seemed Bolton were always in prime condition for their game at 3pm on a Saturday or whenever.

 

In other words, I think I fell for a lot of the Allardyce fanfare in the press.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sam was a mess. If he doesn't have his big lummox upfront he doesn't know what to do.

 

Our best strikers at the time were two midgets, and it scrambled his brain.

 

I remember Oba being shunted out wide of a 4-3-3, and I can't even remember what he did with Owen. It was just silly.

 

All these years later, and it's the same at West Ham. Pining away for Carroll to come and save him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Haris Vuckic

 

I think the majority of fans recognised it as a good appointment at the time. :thup:

 

You mean 'wrongly thought it was going to be good' right?

 

There's an incredibly simple message there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sam was a mess. If he doesn't have his big lummox upfront he doesn't know what to do.

 

Our best strikers at the time were two midgets, and it scrambled his brain.

 

I remember Oba being shunted out wide of a 4-3-3, and I can't even remember what he did with Owen. It was just silly.

 

All these years later, and it's the same at West Ham. Pining away for Carroll to come and save him.

 

Totally agree, he's just not a very good manager at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest neesy111

I supported the appointment to a degree, we needed someone to build some foundations after 3 farcical seasons before and thought he'd maximise the resources of the squad he had.

 

Quickly saw through him though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

From what I remember I couldn't believe we were going for him and disliked him from day dot. Saying that, now someone will find a post saying he's brilliant!

 

Nee worries.

 

Just done a one on one interview on SSN stating that he hopes to have the vast majority of transfer activity complete by the 2nd July, yet another positive thing he's said today.

 

 

First read it as 2nd June. :lol:

 

He's good, but he's not that good :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sam was a mess. If he doesn't have his big lummox upfront he doesn't know what to do.

 

Our best strikers at the time were two midgets, and it scrambled his brain.

 

I remember Oba being shunted out wide of a 4-3-3, and I can't even remember what he did with Owen. It was just silly.

 

All these years later, and it's the same at West Ham. Pining away for Carroll to come and save him.

 

Totally agree, he's just not a very good manager at all.

 

To be fair he did a good job at Bolton.  Obviously a hand in glove type fit there. Similarly Moyes at Everton and then going to Manchester United.  Different type of job.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He is basically a small club manager on small resrouces.  Once he gets given a bigger budget or expectations are higher, he cant raise his own brand of football to match.

 

Small time clogger who has had some good results and a couple of good seasons with Bolton.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

In a pointless bid to justify why many of us wanted him appointed at the time (i.e. save face), in addition to the earlier point raised that we had appointed Fat Sam a few months after his Bolton side had finished 7th (whilst playing OK football for that era), I'd like to add:

 

1) That given how tiny Bolton were, he was essentially unproven from our point of view. He had done well with very little money in some seasons, having to work with Bosmans and players in the twilights of their careers, so it was only natural to assume that he might do even better if given a solid transfer kitty, which he duly received when appointed. Unfortunately the bellend thought the likes of Smith would be great purchases.

 

2) It's also easy to forget that one of the main arguments in favor of his appointment was his "scientific" approach to fitness. At that point in time iirc we were the worst club in the Premiership for players picking up injuries, something that had gotten out of hand given how often key players and first teamers were on and off the treatment table. I remember newspaper articles at the time giving us theories about why our players were frequently picking up injuries, and iirc Souness a few years earlier had tried to do something about it by installing an artificial pitch or something along those lines. Given how advanced Allardyce came across with his "War Room" and mini army of tacticians, the training and diet regimes he boasted about in his interviews, on that front alone appointing Allardyce did seem like a sensible step forward.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In a pointless bid to justify why many of us wanted him appointed at the time (i.e. save face), in addition to the earlier point raised that we had appointed Fat Sam a few months after his Bolton side had finished 7th (whilst playing OK football for that era), I'd like to add:

 

1) That given how tiny Bolton were, he was essentially unproven from our point of view. He had done well with very little money in some seasons, having to work with Bosmans and players in the twilights of their careers, so it was only natural to assume that he might do even better if given a solid transfer kitty, which he duly received when appointed. Unfortunately the bellend thought the likes of Smith would be great purchases.

 

2) It's also easy to forget that one of the main arguments in favor of his appointment was his "scientific" approach to fitness. At that point in time iirc we were the worst club in the Premiership for players picking up injuries, something that had gotten out of hand given how often key players and first teamers were on and off the treatment table. I remember newspaper articles at the time giving us theories about why our players were frequently picking up injuries, and iirc Souness a few years earlier had tried to do something about it by installing an artificial pitch or something along those lines. Given how advanced Allardyce came across with his "War Room" and mini army of tacticians, the training and diet regimes he boasted about in his interviews, on that front alone appointing Allardyce did seem like a sensible step forward.

 

Aye the 2nd point is what I was getting at, was definitely a major reason for the appointment seeming sensible at the time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...