garth Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 Will this stupid cunt ever learn. He deserves all he gets. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueStar Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 We should produce an instructional video starring Ranger and Sammy on the wrong way and the right way to deal with starting a premier league career as a young striker. Have them both at different sides of the stage, Sammy in his striped pajamas having a cup of cocoa and praying his thanks for his opportunity, then bring up the lights on ranger having a west side story style choreographed fight with his gang of backing dancers. Actually, wait, I want it to be a stage production, scrub the video idea. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 I think the best action would be to send him on loan. To Somalia. He'll fit right in with the lawlessness. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ujpest doza Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 Radio just said his car got TWOC'ed while he was being breathalysed but the police stopped the car not far away and arrested the 2 kids who'd done it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 Blatantly his own mates trying to stop the car get pounded and crushed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 Also don't blood tests mean he refused to be breathalysed or they suspected that he was on drugs? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colocho Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 Wasteman. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueStar Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 Also don't blood tests mean he refused to be breathalysed or they suspected that he was on drugs? Think it's just that a roadside test on its own isn't enough to convict. If you fail the breath test, you get taken in for the blood test. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ED209 Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 Also don't blood tests mean he refused to be breathalysed or they suspected that he was on drugs? Think it's just that a roadside test on its own isn't enough to convict. If you fail the breath test, you get taken in for the blood test. Wrong, if you fail a roadside breath test you get taken in for a station breath test. There are then several reasons why blood might be taken. 1) the breath test machine did not produce a reliable reading. (mouth alcohol/malfunction/ readings too far apart) 2) the breath reading was between 40 and 49 and Nile elected to take his statuatory option to provide blood as an alternative over the breath test. 4)there was a medical reason why Nile could not provide a breath specimen. (highly unlikely a professional athlete couldnt provide enough breath) 3) the officers suspect drugs might be involved. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
teohgk Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 they fined players over twitter's comments, but no action taken against this cunt after all these shit? unbelievable Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belfast Boy Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 Also don't blood tests mean he refused to be breathalysed or they suspected that he was on drugs? Think it's just that a roadside test on its own isn't enough to convict. If you fail the breath test, you get taken in for the blood test. Wrong, if you fail a roadside breath test you get taken in for a station breath test. There are then several reasons why blood might be taken. 1) the breath test machine did not produce a reliable reading. (mouth alcohol/malfunction/ readings too far apart) 2) the breath reading was between 40 and 49 and Nile elected to take his statuatory option to provide blood as an alternative over the breath test. 4)there was a medical reason why Nile could not provide a breath specimen. (highly unlikely a professional athlete couldnt provide enough breath) 3) the officers suspect drugs might be involved. A further reason could be that there was no one available who was trained in the intoxiliser during his time in custody, happens a lot here as there are so few trained, particularly during the nights. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 they fined players over twitter's comments, but no action taken against this c*** after all these s***? unbelievable He hasn't been convicted of anything so he hasn't been proven to have done anything wrong. Plus the Barton twitter stuff was bigger than just his individual statements. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ED209 Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 Also don't blood tests mean he refused to be breathalysed or they suspected that he was on drugs? Think it's just that a roadside test on its own isn't enough to convict. If you fail the breath test, you get taken in for the blood test. Wrong, if you fail a roadside breath test you get taken in for a station breath test. There are then several reasons why blood might be taken. 1) the breath test machine did not produce a reliable reading. (mouth alcohol/malfunction/ readings too far apart) 2) the breath reading was between 40 and 49 and Nile elected to take his statuatory option to provide blood as an alternative over the breath test. 4)there was a medical reason why Nile could not provide a breath specimen. (highly unlikely a professional athlete couldnt provide enough breath) 3) the officers suspect drugs might be involved. A further reason could be that there was no one available who was trained in the intoxiliser during his time in custody, happens a lot here as there are so few trained, particularly during the nights. Not true sorry, its actually a camic machine that is used, and for an officer to go through the blood procedure they would have to be trained and authorised to do the breath procedure. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belfast Boy Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 Also don't blood tests mean he refused to be breathalysed or they suspected that he was on drugs? Think it's just that a roadside test on its own isn't enough to convict. If you fail the breath test, you get taken in for the blood test. Wrong, if you fail a roadside breath test you get taken in for a station breath test. There are then several reasons why blood might be taken. 1) the breath test machine did not produce a reliable reading. (mouth alcohol/malfunction/ readings too far apart) 2) the breath reading was between 40 and 49 and Nile elected to take his statuatory option to provide blood as an alternative over the breath test. 4)there was a medical reason why Nile could not provide a breath specimen. (highly unlikely a professional athlete couldnt provide enough breath) 3) the officers suspect drugs might be involved. A further reason could be that there was no one available who was trained in the intoxiliser during his time in custody, happens a lot here as there are so few trained, particularly during the nights. Not true sorry, its actually a camic machine that is used, and for an officer to go through the blood procedure they would have to be trained and authorised to do the breath procedure. Maybe its different over here (N Ireland) but here there are very few staff trained in the station intoxiliser machine and often the easiest process is a blood sample taken by the FMO. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skirge Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 As soon as he is convicted for the assault or drink driving he will be sacked, its all the club is waiting for. The lad is on a downward spiral, its sad to see as he is a talent no doubt about that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlanSkÃrare Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 Very sad this. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cronky Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 Nile ranger Lifes Too Short To Worry About Things. 7 hours ago. Like turning up for training on time, your diet, your career, your future, other people's safety... Yeah. Worrying isn't a good idea, but thinking comes in handy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueStar Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 The Intoxiliser sounds like a weapon a super villain would use. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
54 Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 The Intoxiliser sounds like a weapon a super villain would use. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest thenorthumbrian Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 I don't even think that Ranger has proved himself that good. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Quichà Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 This guy is clearly a complete bellend and needs to be released asap. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueStar Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 This guy is clearly a complete bellend and needs to be released asap. This is going to get confusing, SSN will start running stories about how we're pushing for him to be released from jail. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sifu Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 The lad is a lost cause here really. Shame that this has become so tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest johnson293 Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 Only thing about releasing/sacking him, is that surely we'd have to pay up the 5 year contract he signed late last year? Unless we can argue something about his behaviour/attitude, and offences (if charged)? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 Only thing about releasing/sacking him, is that surely we'd have to pay up the 5 year contract he signed late last year? Unless we can argue something about his behaviour/attitude, and offences (if charged)? If he's sacked, we don't owe him anything. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now