Jump to content

West Ham agree fee in region of £15m with Liverpool for Andy Carroll


Pilko
[[Template core/global/global/poll is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

Recommended Posts

Carroll scored most of his goals from set plays, pretty sure Joey only supplied one of his goals with a cross in open play, against West Ham?

could well be true but I’m not just talking about Carroll’s goals. He was a danger to most defences as Tron has indicated why.

 

The only early balls he gets from LFC are from centre backs with his back to goal. £35m an not a clue what to do with him — hail ‘King Kenny’!

 

Could be worse, they could have spent hundreds of billions on him. :lol:

 

:iamatwat:

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you don’t want to play the ball out wide and hit an early ball for a centre forward to attack as your game plan, why buy Andy Carroll for all that dosh?

 

madness.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you don’t want to play the ball out wide and hit an early ball for a centre forward to attack as your game plan, why buy Andy Carroll for all that dosh?

 

madness.

it was madness as big a piece of insanity as the transfer market has ever produced and it was down to simple desperation not even on the footballing front but the pr front, from their pov they needed to get someone in for big cash to prove yes Liverpool are still a big club and big players in the transfer market after the sale of Torres so they went for the flavour of the month without it seems much consideration of how would he fit in to whatever system they were trying to build.

 

Notice Dalglish was getting narky about reporters asking questions about Carroll getting into the 1st team (which seems a reasonable thing to ask)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Liverpool don’t have anyone who can cross the ball the way that Joey Barton did for him, neither do we now.

You don't think Cabaye, Marveaux and Ben Arfa can cross a ball?

 

Or Adam, Downing, Enrique, Henderson, Johnson or Gerrard.

 

There's plenty of crossing quality there.

 

From one analysis I've seen, one of Liverpool's main problem is the lack of support from CM. Henderson and Downing are both left to themselves in creating chances for Suarez and Carroll, while Lucas and Adam sit deep. Second, Downing is often used on the right side. Consequently he tends to drift inside, instead of running down the touchline to deliver the crossers Carroll needs. Third, Adam is a class act when it comes to hitting the long passes, and set pieces, but he's not the kind of player who's capable of supplying  Carroll with crossers from OPEN play.

 

In sum, what LFC really lacks is a bit more movement in central midfield, and a Kenny who understand that Downing needs to play on the left with Enrique who must  support him so he's able to hit the crossers from dangerous areas. Also they need a cultivated RM. Luckily Kenny is too stupid to understand this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Dontooner

Carroll could play on the deck but it is a big mistake to ask him to cover too much of the pitch.

It almost as if it were to ask a child to eat an elephant's share of food. Even Shearer at him old age was a better outlet when he went to the wings to collect the ball.

They will need to Isolate him in a attacking areas and ask him to focus his time there... If SWP could cover X% of the pitch Andy should cover X/2% but the workrate per Kilometer should still be close on average between the two.

 

They indeed got good players that could cross a ball....but when it is to a single target ....IT is Bloody predictable. When Newcasstle crossed the ball ...Carroll had his mafia gang who were tall and big really to get ahead him or prepare to leech around..

Drogba while playing in his 1st year at Chelsea never really looked to score as well (Duff and Robben were banging them in)...he complained that it wasn.t his lack of quality but his contribution to the game else where...

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's all about his role. Shearer worked within our quick side of 2001-2003 by playing to his strengths and to some extent staying relatively static.

 

It actually gave Shearer a new lease of life having so many quick players around him but Carroll could never replicate that because even if Shearer didn't move as well as Carroll, his control, hold up play, and intelligence was far superior. Carroll has some great raw attributes but as a team player he's not in the same league as Shearer. Or Kuyt for that matter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Carroll is going to succeed.  This is something we are going to have to live with.  The current period is the Andy cole phase at man utd when he suffered from shin splints and we were all smug thinking he'd never win fuck all.

 

Smugness has nowt to do with it. He might succeed, but to suggest it is certain is no more accurate than to write him off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They amount of possession to the amount of service the strikers are getting is applauding

 

Exactly. And that's why Carroll is shit..He needs crossers, preferably from the area around the corner flag. Those are easier to handle. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest NobbyOhNobby

He looks awful like, service shmervice - his movement is non-existant and I'm sure he was more mobile than that when he played for us

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...