JJ7 Posted May 25, 2009 Share Posted May 25, 2009 The only time I saw him for Falkirk was when Rangers hammered them 7-1 I think it was. The goals werent really his fault though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
beardsleymagic Posted May 25, 2009 Share Posted May 25, 2009 To be honest i thought Harper was at fault for the goal yesterday. Not for the shot itself (i don't think any keeper would have gotten that), but leading up to the goal Harper thew a shite ball out to Lovenkrands who then lost it which led to cross in the box which Harper (if he had shouted) should have caught easily, but instead Butt headed it out for a corner. I shit you not i turned to my mate just before they took that corner and said they'll score form this now. And low and behold..... Sorry, thanks for the loyal service etc. etc but the time has come for new blood. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted May 25, 2009 Share Posted May 25, 2009 Steve harper hasn't really done much wrong, it's just that Krul really did look an outstanding talent that night in Europe. It would be great if we could inject some youth and drive right through the team and GK is as good a place to start as any. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted May 25, 2009 Share Posted May 25, 2009 Said in another thread, should sign Joe Murphy whilst he's still in contract talks with Scunny. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted May 25, 2009 Share Posted May 25, 2009 To be honest i thought Harper was at fault for the goal yesterday. Not for the shot itself (i don't think any keeper would have gotten that), but leading up to the goal Harper thew a s**** ball out to Lovenkrands who then lost it which led to cross in the box which Harper (if he had shouted) should have caught easily, but instead Butt headed it out for a corner. I s*** you not i turned to my mate just before they took that corner and said they'll score form this now. And low and behold..... Sorry, thanks for the loyal service etc. etc but the time has come for new blood. Thought exactly the same thing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kimbo Posted May 25, 2009 Share Posted May 25, 2009 I agree it's time to move on, but this is wishful thinking. I'm 100% sure he will first choice next season, and with his injury record will play pretty much every game. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Begbie Posted May 25, 2009 Share Posted May 25, 2009 Krul would have stopped that shot. I second that. But it wasnt harpers foult that we lost the game... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted May 25, 2009 Share Posted May 25, 2009 I don't know where all of this is coming from. He hasn't been Given, but he's been solid and hasn't dropped any clangers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Heneage Posted May 25, 2009 Share Posted May 25, 2009 I don't know where all of this is coming from. He hasn't been Given, but he's been solid and hasn't dropped any clangers. Tottenham? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted May 25, 2009 Share Posted May 25, 2009 I don't know where all of this is coming from. He hasn't been Given, but he's been solid and hasn't dropped any clangers. Tottenham? One contentious mistake since January...nay since slipping over at Anfield? Hardly Hooperesque. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor Swift Posted May 25, 2009 Share Posted May 25, 2009 He's been fine. He saves the shots that he's supposed to save and doesn't save the ones that he's not supposed to save. It's ok. He's an average gk and unless he's on a big wage, I think he's more than good enough for us. Forster and Krul haven't played a competitive football match in over a year, and Krul did it in freakin' Scotland too. I'd rather sell one of the kids (like Forster or Krul, depending on who's worse) and let Harper mentor the better kid. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zero Posted May 25, 2009 Share Posted May 25, 2009 He is the best player yesterday FFS. Saved several close range shots which is top-standard goalkeeping. Can Krul really do that? Don't start another blame game and in the end realize that we actually make a bad decision again. That's a reason why we lost so much useful players in these few years that result in relegation. I really hate this. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted May 25, 2009 Share Posted May 25, 2009 He's been fine. He saves the shots that he's supposed to save and doesn't save the ones that he's not supposed to save. It's ok. He's an average gk and unless he's on a big wage, I think he's more than good enough for us. Forster and Krul haven't played a competitive football match in over a year, and Krul did it in freakin' Scotland too. I'd rather sell one of the kids (like Forster or Krul, depending on who's worse) and let Harper mentor the better kid. If you are reducing playing personnel shortlist on who is and isn't playing, you are going for average uninspirational cloggers who shall never be more than relegation fodder in the PL over players whom could have a good future for both themselves and the club. The choice is, do you want to surround Nolan, Ryan Taylor and Butt with Koumas, Chopra, and Earnshaw, or with some of the brighter prospects that have come into the Premier League and shone? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor Swift Posted May 25, 2009 Share Posted May 25, 2009 Has Krul or Forster shone in the Premiership? I must have missed those matches. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted May 25, 2009 Share Posted May 25, 2009 He's been fine. He saves the shots that he's supposed to save and doesn't save the ones that he's not supposed to save. It's ok. He's an average gk and unless he's on a big wage, I think he's more than good enough for us. Forster and Krul haven't played a competitive football match in over a year, and Krul did it in freakin' Scotland too. I'd rather sell one of the kids (like Forster or Krul, depending on who's worse) and let Harper mentor the better kid. If you are reducing playing personnel shortlist on who is and isn't playing, you are going for average uninspirational cloggers who shall never be more than relegation fodder in the PL over players whom could have a good future for both themselves and the club. The choice is, do you want to surround Nolan, Ryan Taylor and Butt with Koumas, Chopra, and Earnshaw, or with some of the brighter prospects that have come into the Premier League and shone? Read that a couple of times. It doesnt make sense, totally contradictory. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted May 25, 2009 Share Posted May 25, 2009 He's been fine. He saves the shots that he's supposed to save and doesn't save the ones that he's not supposed to save. It's ok. He's an average gk and unless he's on a big wage, I think he's more than good enough for us. Forster and Krul haven't played a competitive football match in over a year, and Krul did it in freakin' Scotland too. I'd rather sell one of the kids (like Forster or Krul, depending on who's worse) and let Harper mentor the better kid. If you are reducing playing personnel shortlist on who is and isn't playing, you are going for average uninspirational cloggers who shall never be more than relegation fodder in the PL over players whom could have a good future for both themselves and the club. The choice is, do you want to surround Nolan, Ryan Taylor and Butt with Koumas, Chopra, and Earnshaw, or with some of the brighter prospects that have come into the Premier League and shone? Read that a couple of times. It doesnt make sense, totally contradictory. How so? Young player plays for us, helps us get promoted, shines in the PL, thus forging agood career. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted May 25, 2009 Share Posted May 25, 2009 Has Krul or Forster shone in the Premiership? I must have missed those matches. I'm not talking about those two, I'm talking more about players like Leighton Baines. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted May 25, 2009 Share Posted May 25, 2009 He's been fine. He saves the shots that he's supposed to save and doesn't save the ones that he's not supposed to save. It's ok. He's an average gk and unless he's on a big wage, I think he's more than good enough for us. Forster and Krul haven't played a competitive football match in over a year, and Krul did it in freakin' Scotland too. I'd rather sell one of the kids (like Forster or Krul, depending on who's worse) and let Harper mentor the better kid. If you are reducing playing personnel shortlist on who is and isn't playing, you are going for average uninspirational cloggers who shall never be more than relegation fodder in the PL over players whom could have a good future for both themselves and the club. The choice is, do you want to surround Nolan, Ryan Taylor and Butt with Koumas, Chopra, and Earnshaw, or with some of the brighter prospects that have come into the Premier League and shone? Read that a couple of times. It doesnt make sense, totally contradictory. How so? Young player plays for us, helps us get promoted, shines in the PL, thus forging agood career. Because the first are not the second. Our players who could have a future haven't lit up the premier league. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted May 25, 2009 Share Posted May 25, 2009 He's been fine. He saves the shots that he's supposed to save and doesn't save the ones that he's not supposed to save. It's ok. He's an average gk and unless he's on a big wage, I think he's more than good enough for us. Forster and Krul haven't played a competitive football match in over a year, and Krul did it in freakin' Scotland too. I'd rather sell one of the kids (like Forster or Krul, depending on who's worse) and let Harper mentor the better kid. If you are reducing playing personnel shortlist on who is and isn't playing, you are going for average uninspirational cloggers who shall never be more than relegation fodder in the PL over players whom could have a good future for both themselves and the club. The choice is, do you want to surround Nolan, Ryan Taylor and Butt with Koumas, Chopra, and Earnshaw, or with some of the brighter prospects that have come into the Premier League and shone? Read that a couple of times. It doesnt make sense, totally contradictory. How so? Young player plays for us, helps us get promoted, shines in the PL, thus forging agood career. Because the first are not the second. Our players who could have a future haven't lit up the premier league. Because they haven't played, are youngsters and needed to spend a year on loan at a Championsip club? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Heneage Posted May 25, 2009 Share Posted May 25, 2009 I don't know where all of this is coming from. He hasn't been Given, but he's been solid and hasn't dropped any clangers. Tottenham? One contentious mistake since January...nay since slipping over at Anfield? Hardly Hooperesque. Not coming out for Bassong's red card. Not calling and punching for the corner yesterday. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geordie Ahmed Posted May 25, 2009 Share Posted May 25, 2009 Harper was a very good backup keeper - playing here and there was fine and he did a decent job BUT in the last few months he has shown he isnt as good as we thought he was - he is a decent keeper at best. Either we start playing Krul or we can look for another keeper Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dinho lad Posted May 25, 2009 Share Posted May 25, 2009 He is the best player yesterday FFS. Saved several close range shots which is top-standard goalkeeping. Can Krul really do that? Don't start another blame game and in the end realize that we actually make a bad decision again. That's a reason why we lost so much useful players in these few years that result in relegation. I really hate this. I bet he had to sweat a lot. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dinho lad Posted May 25, 2009 Share Posted May 25, 2009 To be honest i thought Harper was at fault for the goal yesterday. Not for the shot itself (i don't think any keeper would have gotten that), but leading up to the goal Harper thew a shite ball out to Lovenkrands who then lost it which led to cross in the box which Harper (if he had shouted) should have caught easily, but instead Butt headed it out for a corner. I shit you not i turned to my mate just before they took that corner and said they'll score form this now. And low and behold..... Sorry, thanks for the loyal service etc. etc but the time has come for new blood. Agree. That throw pissed me off. Harper is not a Premier League standard keeper. it dosen't matter anymore, does it? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skirge Posted May 25, 2009 Share Posted May 25, 2009 Give Krul his shot, Harper is a ball watching keeper last thing any clubs needs, my dead dad has faster reflexes than Harper. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich Posted May 25, 2009 Share Posted May 25, 2009 Want to see him sacked off, can't see it happening. He'll be the type who we keep and see the squad "built around". Krul will be the one to go. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now