Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Barkley would be in for me instead of Welbeck.

I'd play Barkly in the Italy Game like but Hodgson is giving them all a game in Miami to acclimatise.

 

It's Sturridge who I think isn't good enough, put him on his right foot and he's hopeless.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

f***ing Welbeck man.

I prefer Welbeck to Sturridge at this level mind.

 

Sturridge is very heavily left footed and Welbeck always seems to deliver for England in big games.

 

Sturridge hasn't had the chance to deliver at a world cup and he blows every other striker we have out of the water on form, no way he shouldn't play every game let alone have welbeck preferred to him  :lol:

 

I agree welbeck delivers for england though

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fucking Welbeck man.

 

Barkley would be in for me instead of Welbeck.

 

It's depressing because of what it symbolises. We'd rather play a workhorse over an outstanding footballing talent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fucking Welbeck man.

 

Barkley would be in for me instead of Welbeck.

 

It's depressing because of what it symbolises. We'd rather play a workhorse over an outstanding footballing talent.

 

Because we haven't had enough of that managerial outlook. :anguish:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Barkley isn't the complete article yet and I do worry if everyone expects him to perform brilliantly, he is guilty of over-trying quite often and isn't an automatic starter at Everton where Martinez is very keen on promoting youth.

 

Ideally I'd prefer Barkley ahead of Welbeck, but while he's a total dud at club level he has played well for England in the past, I don't think it's quite such an awful choice. If Oxlaide Chaimberlain was fit or Sterling wasn't suspended though no way Welbeck should start.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...