Jump to content
Newcastle-Online

Not Worthy Of A Thread

Thespence

by Thespence
in Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

Kaizero

Kaizero

Posted
Posted

Perfect place for the World Cup 2018 to be hosted :thup:

 

Each national team could have their own banner:

 

France: "Halo Halo, France is here"

Germany: "Guten Morgen, where iz the party at?"

 

etc.

 

You mean:

 

France: "We surrender!"

Germany: "Like fuckz is dis cold, ja."

Link to post
Share on other sites
ross magoo

ross magoo

Posted
Posted

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWxRW4j_H6o

 

So Celtic still sticking to the "he lied" argument then.  Despite the fact that the lie was completely inconsequential.  It wasn't a penalty.  The officials got it right.  The (correct) decision didn't unjustly alter the result of the game.  So what's the fucking problem?

 

Here's the fucking problem.

 

Celtic wanted a penalty which wasn't a penalty.  Celtic threw the dolly out of the fucking pram about it boo hoo.  The referee told a porky in his explanation of why a penalty was (correctly) not given.  Celtic are now trying to turn deflect the issue away from the fact that an official made a correct decision in an attempt to make the issue that the official told a porky therefore the SFA are against Celtic and that's why they won't win the league this season despite spending more money than Rangers.

 

Fucking go away.  We've been listening to the same paranoid straw-man arguments since the year fucking dot.  Here's the news; every team gets decisions against them from time to time (although you're complaining about a correct decision).  We all tell lies and sometimes they disadvantage people except in this case it didn't disadvantage you.  It doesn't make it a fucking conspiracy it just makes you a bunch of paranoid fucking morons.

 

I could go all night with this lot but i'll leave it there for now.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Ridman

Ridman

Posted
Posted

The official Euro 2012 mascots

 

http://cdn.worldcupblog.org/poland.worldcupblog.org/files/2010/11/maskotki1.jpg

 

http://cdn.worldcupblog.org/poland.worldcupblog.org/files/2010/11/maskotki2.jpg

 

Two gay retarded brothers is the best they could come up with? They look scary to be honest, probably took the poor kid back stage and raped the juice out of him

Link to post
Share on other sites
Martin Lol

Martin Lol

Posted
Posted

Quotes from Sir Keith Mills, who led the 2012 Olympic bid, is on the advisory board for the 2018 World Cup bid and is also a Tottenham director......................

 

 

 

“If the Olympic Park legacy company decides our bid is the preferred one, then we'll put all our efforts behind trying to move there,” he says. “If we get a 60,000-seat stadium in the Olympic Park at a lower cost than we can in Haringey, the club will have less debt. Fans would never forgive us for landing the club with so much debt that we can't go and buy players.”

 

He accepts the downside of moving away from the original home of Tottenham but says there are upsides.

 

“We'll be moving to a part of London that is 100 per cent more accessible; we'll generate more revenue; it's closer to Canary Wharf and to the City; and it'll attract more sponsorship,” he says.

 

 

Only confirming what has been obvious for some time .

 

 

 

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard-sport/interviews/article-23900185-sir-keith-mills-i-know-why-tv-probe-will-not-kill-our-2018-bid.do

Link to post
Share on other sites
AyeDubbleYoo

AyeDubbleYoo

Posted
Posted

Quotes from Sir Keith Mills, who led the 2012 Olympic bid, is on the advisory board for the 2018 World Cup bid and is also a Tottenham director......................

 

 

 

“If the Olympic Park legacy company decides our bid is the preferred one, then we'll put all our efforts behind trying to move there,” he says. “If we get a 60,000-seat stadium in the Olympic Park at a lower cost than we can in Haringey, the club will have less debt. Fans would never forgive us for landing the club with so much debt that we can't go and buy players.”

 

He accepts the downside of moving away from the original home of Tottenham but says there are upsides.

 

“We'll be moving to a part of London that is 100 per cent more accessible; we'll generate more revenue; it's closer to Canary Wharf and to the City; and it'll attract more sponsorship,” he says.

 

 

Only confirming what has been obvious for some time .

 

 

 

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard-sport/interviews/article-23900185-sir-keith-mills-i-know-why-tv-probe-will-not-kill-our-2018-bid.do

 

Do you think it makes sense in any way though?

 

Seems to me that Spurs are just trying to add credibility to a bid that was clearly designed to intimidate the council into allowing their original new stadium plans.

Link to post
Share on other sites
AyeDubbleYoo

AyeDubbleYoo

Posted
Posted

Here's the fucking problem.

 

Celtic wanted a penalty which wasn't a penalty.  Celtic threw the dolly out of the fucking pram about it boo hoo.  The referee told a porky in his explanation of why a penalty was (correctly) not given.  Celtic are now trying to turn deflect the issue away from the fact that an official made a correct decision in an attempt to make the issue that the official told a porky therefore the SFA are against Celtic and that's why they won't win the league this season despite spending more money than Rangers.

 

Fucking go away.  We've been listening to the same paranoid straw-man arguments since the year fucking dot.  Here's the news; every team gets decisions against them from time to time (although you're complaining about a correct decision).  We all tell lies and sometimes they disadvantage people except in this case it didn't disadvantage you.  It doesn't make it a fucking conspiracy it just makes you a bunch of paranoid fucking morons.

 

I could go all night with this lot but i'll leave it there for now.

 

Totally, FAs in general need to grow a backbone and get behind their referees.

 

Managers and players need to learn to tow the line.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Martin Lol

Martin Lol

Posted
Posted

Quotes from Sir Keith Mills, who led the 2012 Olympic bid, is on the advisory board for the 2018 World Cup bid and is also a Tottenham director......................

 

 

 

“If the Olympic Park legacy company decides our bid is the preferred one, then we'll put all our efforts behind trying to move there,” he says. “If we get a 60,000-seat stadium in the Olympic Park at a lower cost than we can in Haringey, the club will have less debt. Fans would never forgive us for landing the club with so much debt that we can't go and buy players.”

 

He accepts the downside of moving away from the original home of Tottenham but says there are upsides.

 

“We'll be moving to a part of London that is 100 per cent more accessible; we'll generate more revenue; it's closer to Canary Wharf and to the City; and it'll attract more sponsorship,” he says.

 

 

Only confirming what has been obvious for some time .

 

 

 

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard-sport/interviews/article-23900185-sir-keith-mills-i-know-why-tv-probe-will-not-kill-our-2018-bid.do

 

Do you think it makes sense in any way though?

 

Seems to me that Spurs are just trying to add credibility to a bid that was clearly designed to intimidate the council into allowing their original new stadium plans.

 

I think that Spurs are doing what they can to remove the clauses that Haringey Council,  TFL (Transport for London), English Heritage and others are trying to add on to the total cost.  The extras that they want for easing the process (others would call it blackmail) is currently reckoned to be something between £40-70m.  It's not necessarily about getting the original new stadium plans back, it's the extras that are being added on.  Haringey have approved the plans and yesterday approved the Compulsory Purchase Orders, the package is now with the Boris Johnson, the Mayor of London, who is due to give his decision on 25th November.

 

The Olympic Park legacy company make their preferred option public in March.  Even the majority on West Ham's forums reckon Spurs with AEG have got a stronger package that West Ham with Newham Council.  It really depends on whether the legacy company select Spurs and whether Haringey have made any concessions on funding.  My gut feeling is that we'll wind up in Stratford, can't see Haringey offering enough back to turn Levy's head.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Martin Lol

Martin Lol

Posted
Posted

Really interesting that, I didn't know those details. I just couldn't imagine Spurs playing in Stratford.

 

Nor could I to be honest but most fans think it is increasingly likely.  Not surprising but splitting the fans into 2 camps, stay in Tottenham with huge debt or move to Stratford with £150m more in the bank.  Tough decision to make, what is obvious is that to stay as we are at WHL will slowly but surely take us backwards.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...