AyeDubbleYoo Posted December 22, 2012 Share Posted December 22, 2012 Wonder if Harry will turn down money in January or refuse to sanction signings on big wages? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ishmael Posted December 22, 2012 Share Posted December 22, 2012 Harry is f***ing gutted. He wanted to get wheeling and dealing only to find that, well, he can't. Wages are far too high, squad is far too bloated. Is this Harry Redknapp's worst nightmare? He's arrived at a club in the condition that he usually leaves clubs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted December 22, 2012 Share Posted December 22, 2012 Harry is f***ing gutted. He wanted to get wheeling and dealing only to find that, well, he can't. Wages are far too high, squad is far too bloated. Is this Harry Redknapp's worst nightmare? He's arrived at a club in the condition that he usually leaves clubs. True, but Fernandes has enough money to roll the dice in January. I think this we ain't got money is a bit of a bluff so his transfer record will look better, keep prices in check, while being active in getting the higher earners off the books. He's playing transfer games before the window is even open. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMTW Posted December 23, 2012 Share Posted December 23, 2012 He's playing transfer games before the window is even open. Redknapp in cuntish transfer games shock. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Village Idiot Posted December 23, 2012 Share Posted December 23, 2012 Pinto and Barça agree to a one year extension Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Posted December 23, 2012 Share Posted December 23, 2012 http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/11711/8352299 Boss Harry Redknapp launches scathing attack on wages at QPR Asked about his plans for the January transfer window, Redknapp said: "I don't want to spend their (the club's) money, to be honest with you. "There are a lot of players at this club who earn far too much money for what they are; far, far, far too much money for their ability and what they give to the club. "I don't really want to see the owners have their pants taken down like they have in the past. There's a lot of agents made money out of them. "I fined a player last week and he was earning more than any player earned at Tottenham. "You shouldn't be paying massive wages when you've got a stadium that holds 18,000 people. Redknapp also confirmed that full-back Bosingwa had been fined a fortnight's wages after refusing to sit on the bench for last weekend's 2-1 victory over Fulham. "He has been fined two weeks' wages, £130,000. Not too bad for two weeks, decent isn't it? Not too bad for playing on a Saturday, it's okay." Asked how he might handle a player like that, Redknapp said: "We'll find out in January." :lol: Fair play tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted December 23, 2012 Share Posted December 23, 2012 Harry is f***ing gutted. He wanted to get wheeling and dealing only to find that, well, he can't. Wages are far too high, squad is far too bloated. Is this Harry Redknapp's worst nightmare? He's arrived at a club in the condition that he usually leaves clubs. True, but Fernandes has enough money to roll the dice in January. I think this we ain't got money is a bit of a bluff so his transfer record will look better, keep prices in check, while being active in getting the higher earners off the books. He's playing transfer games before the window is even open. It's all borrowed. They're going to be Portsmouth in 3 years. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted December 23, 2012 Share Posted December 23, 2012 Harry is f***ing gutted. He wanted to get wheeling and dealing only to find that, well, he can't. Wages are far too high, squad is far too bloated. Is this Harry Redknapp's worst nightmare? He's arrived at a club in the condition that he usually leaves clubs. True, but Fernandes has enough money to roll the dice in January. I think this we ain't got money is a bit of a bluff so his transfer record will look better, keep prices in check, while being active in getting the higher earners off the books. He's playing transfer games before the window is even open. It's all borrowed. They're going to be Portsmouth in 3 years. Aye. Fernandes isn't the multi billionaire everyone thinks he is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Village Idiot Posted December 23, 2012 Share Posted December 23, 2012 They are probably banking on the massive TV payout if they stay up. Will end in tears if they don't. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted December 23, 2012 Share Posted December 23, 2012 They gave Bosingwa a 3 year deal too. He can sit on that 65K a week, Alan Smith style. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beren Posted December 23, 2012 Share Posted December 23, 2012 Harry is f***ing gutted. He wanted to get wheeling and dealing only to find that, well, he can't. Wages are far too high, squad is far too bloated. Is this Harry Redknapp's worst nightmare? He's arrived at a club in the condition that he usually leaves clubs. True, but Fernandes has enough money to roll the dice in January. I think this we ain't got money is a bit of a bluff so his transfer record will look better, keep prices in check, while being active in getting the higher earners off the books. He's playing transfer games before the window is even open. It's all borrowed. They're going to be Portsmouth in 3 years. Didn't know that. Mark Hughes with money was just an insane choice. Some of the signings they made, man - as though it were burning a hole in their pocket. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beren Posted December 23, 2012 Share Posted December 23, 2012 They are probably banking on the massive TV payout if they stay up. Will end in tears if they don't. What are the details of this? I know it's more than in previous years, but how much more are we talking here? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheHoob Posted December 23, 2012 Share Posted December 23, 2012 Aye can't see many of them being in a hurry to jump off the gravy train. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted December 23, 2012 Share Posted December 23, 2012 They are probably banking on the massive TV payout if they stay up. Will end in tears if they don't. What are the details of this? I know it's more than in previous years, but how much more are we talking here? http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2012/nov/12/premier-league-tv-rights-5-bn Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted December 23, 2012 Share Posted December 23, 2012 They are probably banking on the massive TV payout if they stay up. Will end in tears if they don't. What are the details of this? I know it's more than in previous years, but how much more are we talking here? Think it goes up between 30%-50%. Though I think BT's coverage will end up going down the drain like the Setanta deal. Ridiculous amount they've paid. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted December 23, 2012 Share Posted December 23, 2012 They are probably banking on the massive TV payout if they stay up. Will end in tears if they don't. What are the details of this? I know it's more than in previous years, but how much more are we talking here? http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/jun/13/premier-league-tv-rights-3-billion-sky-bt The landscape of British broadcasting has shifted dramatically after BT bought a large slice of televised football rights, boosting the Premier League's next TV deal to a record £3bn over three years, a 71% increase. This equates to at least £14m more per year for each football club, with the bottom team in the league from 2013-14 onwards likely to receive more than the £60.6m Manchester City earned this year for ending the season as champions. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted December 23, 2012 Share Posted December 23, 2012 They are probably banking on the massive TV payout if they stay up. Will end in tears if they don't. What are the details of this? I know it's more than in previous years, but how much more are we talking here? not sure I recall off the top of my head but I think I remember that next season the side thats 20th will get more cash in total than City did winning it last season Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Village Idiot Posted December 23, 2012 Share Posted December 23, 2012 I have seen people claiming that it will be 20-25 million on average more than the current deal, after all TV and prize money. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beren Posted December 23, 2012 Share Posted December 23, 2012 Holy smokes. Thanks all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ElDiablo Posted December 23, 2012 Share Posted December 23, 2012 They are probably banking on the massive TV payout if they stay up. Will end in tears if they don't. What are the details of this? I know it's more than in previous years, but how much more are we talking here? http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/jun/13/premier-league-tv-rights-3-billion-sky-bt The landscape of British broadcasting has shifted dramatically after BT bought a large slice of televised football rights, boosting the Premier League's next TV deal to a record £3bn over three years, a 71% increase. This equates to at least £14m more per year for each football club, with the bottom team in the league from 2013-14 onwards likely to receive more than the £60.6m Manchester City earned this year for ending the season as champions. Won't that just mean prices will sky rocket? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted December 23, 2012 Share Posted December 23, 2012 They are probably banking on the massive TV payout if they stay up. Will end in tears if they don't. What are the details of this? I know it's more than in previous years, but how much more are we talking here? http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/jun/13/premier-league-tv-rights-3-billion-sky-bt The landscape of British broadcasting has shifted dramatically after BT bought a large slice of televised football rights, boosting the Premier League's next TV deal to a record £3bn over three years, a 71% increase. This equates to at least £14m more per year for each football club, with the bottom team in the league from 2013-14 onwards likely to receive more than the £60.6m Manchester City earned this year for ending the season as champions. Won't that just mean prices will sky rocket? Expect another big increase in the Sky package in the summer. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted December 23, 2012 Share Posted December 23, 2012 They are probably banking on the massive TV payout if they stay up. Will end in tears if they don't. What are the details of this? I know it's more than in previous years, but how much more are we talking here? http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/jun/13/premier-league-tv-rights-3-billion-sky-bt The landscape of British broadcasting has shifted dramatically after BT bought a large slice of televised football rights, boosting the Premier League's next TV deal to a record £3bn over three years, a 71% increase. This equates to at least £14m more per year for each football club, with the bottom team in the league from 2013-14 onwards likely to receive more than the £60.6m Manchester City earned this year for ending the season as champions. Won't that just mean prices will sky rocket? Probably. Bad news for us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted December 23, 2012 Share Posted December 23, 2012 PL should make sure that clubs reduce ticket prices by a set % across the board and invest in grassroots/community instead of them pumping it straight into players and agents pockets. Fucking horrendous figures, going to have shitty clubs like whoever bringing in more money than some of Europe's top teams. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beren Posted December 23, 2012 Share Posted December 23, 2012 They are probably banking on the massive TV payout if they stay up. Will end in tears if they don't. What are the details of this? I know it's more than in previous years, but how much more are we talking here? http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/jun/13/premier-league-tv-rights-3-billion-sky-bt The landscape of British broadcasting has shifted dramatically after BT bought a large slice of televised football rights, boosting the Premier League's next TV deal to a record £3bn over three years, a 71% increase. This equates to at least £14m more per year for each football club, with the bottom team in the league from 2013-14 onwards likely to receive more than the £60.6m Manchester City earned this year for ending the season as champions. Won't that just mean prices will sky rocket? If income rises across the board, I wouldn't think so. Although, a club with truly ambitious owners and a club like ours may treat the income differently. So Everton who are generally just skint, but spend when they can, may invest it in the team, whereas Ashley may take it as drawings Edit: Oh you mean, ticket prices. Thought you meant player prices. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted December 23, 2012 Share Posted December 23, 2012 PL should make sure that clubs reduce ticket prices by a set % across the board and invest in grassroots/community instead of them pumping it straight into players and agents pockets. Fucking horrendous figures, going to have shitty clubs like whoever bringing in more money than some of Europe's top teams. Correct, but I bet it doesn't happen though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts