Hanshithispantz Posted June 20, 2011 Share Posted June 20, 2011 That control pad Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baggio Posted June 20, 2011 Share Posted June 20, 2011 http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/250504/Michael-Owen-out-of-Toon Wonder who is telling the truth in this article. Shepherd says we were paying him £90k a week whilst Llambias claims it was £133k a week. Owen's salary was usually always quoted around £100k. while they're both nincompoops, i'd be more likely to believe shepherd. the fact that Llambias chose to preface the amount of pay with 'under kevin keegans management' should tell you all you need to know Well Llambias has yet again broken the 11th commandment and criticised Keegan, but it's interesting to note Keegan's comments on the Owen situation from March 2008 - ................................. I'm not here to defend Lambias but has it occurred to you two he may have been stating a fact? Owen could have been signed on an initial £90K a week with a year on year rise to take it up to £133K when Keegan was here. I really can't see how anything Lambias has said this time is a slur on Keegan. I wasn't doubting what Llambias was saying, and while including the 'Keegan' detail wasn't a 'slur', I think his reason for putting it in is more than just for stating a passing fact. I think he's irritated by the high esteem that Keegan and Shearer are held in by so many supporters, and he wanted to include a subtle reminder that Keegan was lobbying hard, in public and private, for Owen not to be sold and to be offered a new contract. All perfectly true and, because I'm no fan of Keegan's, I've personally no problem with it. But Llambias would be better off keeping quiet because he's not going to win anybody round that way. I don't think anyone can have much argument with this, there's no doubt that Keegan done enough public rallying to put pressure on the club to give Owen a new contract, if people wondered why the club didn't want to rush into giving him anything it looks like now we know. It's also worth pointing out that while Owen had a great run of form towards the end of the season playing in the hole behind the 2 strikers, it was a formation that he went on to scrap in the last game of the season and went back to a conventional 4-4-2 which he stuck with through pre season and in the opening league and cup games. As for his signing, I thought it was great at the time but looking back now it was always destined to fail as if he avoided injury he would have jumped ship at the first chance anyway. Keegan didn't scrap the formation. It was just that lanky fat aussie bastard got himself injured as usual. So he was only going to use it when he had Viduka, Martins and Owen all fit at the same time? Good job none of them were injury prone then. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted June 20, 2011 Share Posted June 20, 2011 http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/250504/Michael-Owen-out-of-Toon Wonder who is telling the truth in this article. Shepherd says we were paying him £90k a week whilst Llambias claims it was £133k a week. Owen's salary was usually always quoted around £100k. while they're both nincompoops, i'd be more likely to believe shepherd. the fact that Llambias chose to preface the amount of pay with 'under kevin keegans management' should tell you all you need to know Well Llambias has yet again broken the 11th commandment and criticised Keegan, but it's interesting to note Keegan's comments on the Owen situation from March 2008 - ................................. I'm not here to defend Lambias but has it occurred to you two he may have been stating a fact? Owen could have been signed on an initial £90K a week with a year on year rise to take it up to £133K when Keegan was here. I really can't see how anything Lambias has said this time is a slur on Keegan. I wasn't doubting what Llambias was saying, and while including the 'Keegan' detail wasn't a 'slur', I think his reason for putting it in is more than just for stating a passing fact. I think he's irritated by the high esteem that Keegan and Shearer are held in by so many supporters, and he wanted to include a subtle reminder that Keegan was lobbying hard, in public and private, for Owen not to be sold and to be offered a new contract. All perfectly true and, because I'm no fan of Keegan's, I've personally no problem with it. But Llambias would be better off keeping quiet because he's not going to win anybody round that way. I don't think anyone can have much argument with this, there's no doubt that Keegan done enough public rallying to put pressure on the club to give Owen a new contract, if people wondered why the club didn't want to rush into giving him anything it looks like now we know. It's also worth pointing out that while Owen had a great run of form towards the end of the season playing in the hole behind the 2 strikers, it was a formation that he went on to scrap in the last game of the season and went back to a conventional 4-4-2 which he stuck with through pre season and in the opening league and cup games. As for his signing, I thought it was great at the time but looking back now it was always destined to fail as if he avoided injury he would have jumped ship at the first chance anyway. Keegan didn't scrap the formation. It was just that lanky fat aussie bastard got himself injured as usual. So he was only going to use it when he had Viduka, Martins and Owen all fit at the same time? Good job none of them were injury prone then. Who else was he going to use instead of the fat aussie, Shola who amazingly is less mobile than Viduka and Carroll was never ready for Premiership football then. Maybe he could have used Alan Smith. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wacko Posted June 20, 2011 Share Posted June 20, 2011 One great thing about football is that every pair of teams have one thing in common. For example, despite my hatred of Liverpool, we share a wonderful dislike of Michael Owen. It's genuinely touching. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
David28 Posted June 20, 2011 Share Posted June 20, 2011 http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/250504/Michael-Owen-out-of-Toon Wonder who is telling the truth in this article. Shepherd says we were paying him £90k a week whilst Llambias claims it was £133k a week. Owen's salary was usually always quoted around £100k. while they're both nincompoops, i'd be more likely to believe shepherd. the fact that Llambias chose to preface the amount of pay with 'under kevin keegans management' should tell you all you need to know Well Llambias has yet again broken the 11th commandment and criticised Keegan, but it's interesting to note Keegan's comments on the Owen situation from March 2008 - ................................. I'm not here to defend Lambias but has it occurred to you two he may have been stating a fact? Owen could have been signed on an initial £90K a week with a year on year rise to take it up to £133K when Keegan was here. I really can't see how anything Lambias has said this time is a slur on Keegan. I wasn't doubting what Llambias was saying, and while including the 'Keegan' detail wasn't a 'slur', I think his reason for putting it in is more than just for stating a passing fact. I think he's irritated by the high esteem that Keegan and Shearer are held in by so many supporters, and he wanted to include a subtle reminder that Keegan was lobbying hard, in public and private, for Owen not to be sold and to be offered a new contract. All perfectly true and, because I'm no fan of Keegan's, I've personally no problem with it. But Llambias would be better off keeping quiet because he's not going to win anybody round that way. I don't think anyone can have much argument with this, there's no doubt that Keegan done enough public rallying to put pressure on the club to give Owen a new contract, if people wondered why the club didn't want to rush into giving him anything it looks like now we know. It's also worth pointing out that while Owen had a great run of form towards the end of the season playing in the hole behind the 2 strikers, it was a formation that he went on to scrap in the last game of the season and went back to a conventional 4-4-2 which he stuck with through pre season and in the opening league and cup games. As for his signing, I thought it was great at the time but looking back now it was always destined to fail as if he avoided injury he would have jumped ship at the first chance anyway. Keegan didn't scrap the formation. It was just that lanky fat aussie bastard got himself injured as usual. So he was only going to use it when he had Viduka, Martins and Owen all fit at the same time? Good job none of them were injury prone then. Who else was he going to use instead of the fat aussie, Shola who amazingly is less mobile than Viduka and Carroll was never ready for Premiership football then. Maybe he could have used Alan Smith. Which he even did against Chelsea (?) in one of the last matches in the 07/08 season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Geordiesned Posted June 21, 2011 Share Posted June 21, 2011 @themichaelowen: How bad is the tv tonight? Flicking through the channels with no success. Any ideas anyone? Twitter for iPhone • 21/06/2011 20:16 Boring! Is it wrong that I suggested he takes an overdose?? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wormy Posted June 21, 2011 Share Posted June 21, 2011 It'd be wrong if you didn't. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sifu Posted June 21, 2011 Share Posted June 21, 2011 It'd be wrong if you didn't. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted June 21, 2011 Share Posted June 21, 2011 Tuesday's actually a really good day for telly as well, the clueless cunt. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilko Posted June 21, 2011 Share Posted June 21, 2011 Tuesday's actually a really good day for telly as well, the clueless cunt. Hindi Hen Do on BBC1, Lead Balloon on BBC2, Family Guy, Newsnight, all sorts! He'll probably just flip over to attheraces and rub one out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted June 21, 2011 Share Posted June 21, 2011 Tuesday's actually a really good day for telly as well, the clueless cunt. Hindi Hen Do on BBC1, Lead Balloon on BBC2, Family Guy, Newsnight, all sorts! He'll probably just flip over to attheraces and rub one out. Four Rooms, Luther, Geordie Shore, Angry Boys. There's too much telly if anything. What a cunt. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wormy Posted June 21, 2011 Share Posted June 21, 2011 Can't forget Compete for the Meat. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fugazi Posted June 21, 2011 Share Posted June 21, 2011 Lock, Stock... on ITV2, Se7en on 5 USA. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilko Posted June 21, 2011 Share Posted June 21, 2011 Can't forget Compete for the Meat. I watched the first episode of that shit. 21 minutes of a self-professed 'pub quiz' format show, including a commercial break, and he hadn't even asked a fucking question. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wormy Posted June 21, 2011 Share Posted June 21, 2011 Can't forget Compete for the Meat. I watched the first episode of that shit. 21 minutes of a self-professed 'pub quiz' format show, including a commercial break, and he hadn't even asked a fucking question. It's cringeworthy to fuck, no argument. I despised it first episode, grown quite fond of it though And when Zoe Salmon's legs are on screen I can't turn the fuck over. Fuck knows why she's had to degrade herself to this bullshit but God bless her for it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dinho lad Posted June 22, 2011 Share Posted June 22, 2011 Don't forget the Fairy Jobmother! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cort Posted June 22, 2011 Share Posted June 22, 2011 [snip] I remember that day like it was yesterday. I was so happy. Still annoys me that he turned out to be such a douche. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted June 22, 2011 Share Posted June 22, 2011 Never felt real, not even at the time. Never was. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted June 22, 2011 Share Posted June 22, 2011 That's the compilation I made for it EDIT: Didn't realise there were football clips in it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted June 22, 2011 Share Posted June 22, 2011 NSG :lol: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cort Posted June 22, 2011 Share Posted June 22, 2011 That's the compilation I made for it EDIT: Didn't realise there were football clips in it. Amazing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sifu Posted June 22, 2011 Share Posted June 22, 2011 NSG :lol: "We're obviously a bigger club, we're going to win the league!!!" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest johnson293 Posted June 27, 2011 Share Posted June 27, 2011 http://www.thedailytackle.com/2011/06/michael-owen-allowed-to-train-at-home.html Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jubby Posted June 27, 2011 Share Posted June 27, 2011 http://www.thedailytackle.com/2011/06/michael-owen-allowed-to-train-at-home.html Wat a cunt Michael Owen , wat a cunt!!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted June 27, 2011 Share Posted June 27, 2011 Erm, it's a comedy website... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now