relámpago blanco Posted October 23, 2010 Share Posted October 23, 2010 No subs today, when was the last time he didn't use any? That's a rarity with any side. It shows how much in control of the game we were. Or that Caldewood decided he subs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skeletor Posted October 23, 2010 Share Posted October 23, 2010 No subs today, when was the last time he didn't use any? When we drew 1-1 with Man Utd opening day of our relegation season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BooBoo Posted October 23, 2010 Share Posted October 23, 2010 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest koye Posted October 23, 2010 Share Posted October 23, 2010 Deserves credit today because he made a few changes from last weekend, which won us three points today. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ishmael Posted October 23, 2010 Share Posted October 23, 2010 The midfield he selected today would be torn to pieces against a decent side. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BooBoo Posted October 23, 2010 Share Posted October 23, 2010 The midfield he selected today would be torn to pieces against a decent side. What sort of point is that. Why not say that he saw what we were up against and selected the XI he thought would combat them best? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted October 23, 2010 Share Posted October 23, 2010 mcnaly is writing his usual shit http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/news/Newcastle-boss-Chris-Hughton-insists-he-can-cope-with-the-pressure-despite-Martin-O-Neill-s-name-is-being-mentioned-as-his-possible-replacement-article611909.html obviously written before the game tonight and with the assumption we'd be beat, mentions o'neill and hoddle as potential replacements (as if oneill would come) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ketsbaia Posted October 23, 2010 Share Posted October 23, 2010 Chuffed for him tonight. The changes worked, the teamtalk worked and the suit worked. I just want him to succeed so badly. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted October 23, 2010 Share Posted October 23, 2010 and now anal olivers joining in http://www.people.co.uk/sport/football/news/2010/10/24/newcastle-boss-chris-hughton-under-pressure-as-mike-ashley-is-poised-with-axe-102039-22654394/ in a few words bullshit and get yourself a job you can actually do oliver Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted October 23, 2010 Share Posted October 23, 2010 Absolutely embarrassing. It doesn't even make sense, going on about home form in the Premier League then saying he could be sacked if we lose the next two games - one of which is in the Coca-Cola Cup. Just fuck off you set of scummy vultures. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted October 23, 2010 Share Posted October 23, 2010 These stories coming out after a victory are pretty stupid like "Unless he can stear them away from the relegation zone" - 5 points and 9 places not enough like? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted October 23, 2010 Share Posted October 23, 2010 Oliver is closer to being Satan than a journalist worth acknowledging. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted October 24, 2010 Share Posted October 24, 2010 The press are trying to create a story, twats. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan_Taylor Posted October 24, 2010 Share Posted October 24, 2010 Best one yet? http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/news/Joe-Kinnear-could-be-set-for-a-sensational-as-Newcastle-manager-with-Chris-Hughton-fighting-to-save-his-job-article606085.html I liked The most eye-catching suggestion has been that ex-boss Kinnear wants a return to the St James’ Park hot-seat alongside Beardsley, with Kevin Nolan as player-coach Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted October 24, 2010 Share Posted October 24, 2010 Published 23:00 19/10/10 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan_Taylor Posted October 24, 2010 Share Posted October 24, 2010 Aw aye its not new, just the idea of Kinnear and Nolan made me....well vomit at first then I got a laugh out of it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpal78 Posted October 24, 2010 Share Posted October 24, 2010 Deserve a lot of credit today especially for sticking with 2 upfront and inspiring the players during half time. But I still have concerns on his ability to use subs effectively. It was telling that in the last few minutes all he did was ask Carrol to help the defense to preserve the lead. This time it worked but would have preferred him to take out one striker and beef up the midfield with Guthrie or just sub in Lovenkrads for Ameobi just to waste time or at the very least ask the players to take the ball into the corner (we continued to attack till the very last moment which could have easily backfired) In other words he is a very non interventionist (or minimal interventionist) sort of manager who prefers players to work things out instead of trying to actively influence the game whilst it is going on. I agree that there is no way anyone can say what would have happened had he made the subs, but without the ability to use sub effectively, that is one less weapon in his armory as a manager. So this is one area he has got to improve but Chris is still good enough for us, better than some of the names bandied around by the press and hopefully will keep us up Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted October 24, 2010 Share Posted October 24, 2010 Deserve a lot of credit today especially for sticking with 2 upfront and inspiring the players during half time. But I still have concerns on his ability to use subs effectively. It was telling that in the last few minutes all he did was ask Carrol to help the defense to preserve the lead. This time it worked but would have preferred him to take out one striker and beef up the midfield with Guthrie or just sub in Lovenkrads for Ameobi just to waste time or at the very least ask the players to take the ball into the corner (we continued to attack till the very last moment which could have easily backfired) In other words he is a very non interventionist (or minimal interventionist) sort of manager who prefers players to work things out instead of trying to actively influence the game whilst it is going on. I agree that there is no way anyone can say what would have happened had he made the subs, but without the ability to use sub effectively, that is one less weapon in his armory as a manager. So this is one area he has got to improve but Chris is still good enough for us, better than some of the names bandied around by the press and hopefully will keep us up All 11 players were contributing at the end of the game, changing the team around could have caused more problems than it solved as it often takes players time to get up to pace. I thought that he was spot on leaving the starting 11 alone for the full game. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OzzieMandias Posted October 24, 2010 Share Posted October 24, 2010 Deserve a lot of credit today especially for sticking with 2 upfront and inspiring the players during half time. But I still have concerns on his ability to use subs effectively. It was telling that in the last few minutes all he did was ask Carrol to help the defense to preserve the lead. This time it worked but would have preferred him to take out one striker and beef up the midfield with Guthrie or just sub in Lovenkrads for Ameobi just to waste time or at the very least ask the players to take the ball into the corner (we continued to attack till the very last moment which could have easily backfired) In other words he is a very non interventionist (or minimal interventionist) sort of manager who prefers players to work things out instead of trying to actively influence the game whilst it is going on. I agree that there is no way anyone can say what would have happened had he made the subs, but without the ability to use sub effectively, that is one less weapon in his armory as a manager. So this is one area he has got to improve but Chris is still good enough for us, better than some of the names bandied around by the press and hopefully will keep us up All 11 players were contributing at the end of the game, changing the team around could have caused more problems than it solved as it often takes players time to get up to pace. I thought that he was spot on leaving the starting 11 alone for the full game. Agreed. It's not as if at any point in the second half they looked like they were running into trouble. On the other hand, our lead wasn't so unassailable that it would have been a good time to give someone a run-out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpal78 Posted October 24, 2010 Share Posted October 24, 2010 Deserve a lot of credit today especially for sticking with 2 upfront and inspiring the players during half time. But I still have concerns on his ability to use subs effectively. It was telling that in the last few minutes all he did was ask Carrol to help the defense to preserve the lead. This time it worked but would have preferred him to take out one striker and beef up the midfield with Guthrie or just sub in Lovenkrads for Ameobi just to waste time or at the very least ask the players to take the ball into the corner (we continued to attack till the very last moment which could have easily backfired) In other words he is a very non interventionist (or minimal interventionist) sort of manager who prefers players to work things out instead of trying to actively influence the game whilst it is going on. I agree that there is no way anyone can say what would have happened had he made the subs, but without the ability to use sub effectively, that is one less weapon in his armory as a manager. So this is one area he has got to improve but Chris is still good enough for us, better than some of the names bandied around by the press and hopefully will keep us up All 11 players were contributing at the end of the game, changing the team around could have caused more problems than it solved as it often takes players time to get up to pace. I thought that he was spot on leaving the starting 11 alone for the full game. You're possibly right Mick, all I'm saying is that I have yet to see him (this season at least) influencing a game through substitutions and I think that is a weakness that he has to improve on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
EthiGeordie Posted October 24, 2010 Share Posted October 24, 2010 and now anal olivers joining in http://www.people.co.uk/sport/football/news/2010/10/24/newcastle-boss-chris-hughton-under-pressure-as-mike-ashley-is-poised-with-axe-102039-22654394/ in a few words bullshit and get yourself a job you can actually do oliver I can not belive somebody pay something money for this dog shit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
EthiGeordie Posted October 24, 2010 Share Posted October 24, 2010 Deserve a lot of credit today especially for sticking with 2 upfront and inspiring the players during half time. But I still have concerns on his ability to use subs effectively. It was telling that in the last few minutes all he did was ask Carrol to help the defense to preserve the lead. This time it worked but would have preferred him to take out one striker and beef up the midfield with Guthrie or just sub in Lovenkrads for Ameobi just to waste time or at the very least ask the players to take the ball into the corner (we continued to attack till the very last moment which could have easily backfired) In other words he is a very non interventionist (or minimal interventionist) sort of manager who prefers players to work things out instead of trying to actively influence the game whilst it is going on. I agree that there is no way anyone can say what would have happened had he made the subs, but without the ability to use sub effectively, that is one less weapon in his armory as a manager. So this is one area he has got to improve but Chris is still good enough for us, better than some of the names bandied around by the press and hopefully will keep us up I like Hughton but even if I dont like him. There is no way Ashley going to fire him. He is the cheapest option he have out there. Why would he pay someone 2 mil on wage and then get pressured in Jan to spend loads on players ? All this papers rumers are they have to write something about Newcastle and poor Chris is in the middle of all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benwell Lad Posted October 24, 2010 Share Posted October 24, 2010 How on earth are people like Brian McNally earning a living as journalists ? He writes just like the person he is - fat and lazy. Chris Hughton is doing a far better job at football management than above mentioned journos are as sports correspondents. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor Swift Posted October 24, 2010 Share Posted October 24, 2010 I have a feeling that a person of influence at the club reads this forum and is influenced by the majority opinion on things here. Smith no longer playing, Perch dropped, Hughton wearing a suit, starting with two up front yesterday etc. Gotta give Hughton credit for being so willing to change things around. Such a refreshing change from Kinnear, Souness and Roeder. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ridzuan Posted October 24, 2010 Share Posted October 24, 2010 I have a feeling that a person of influence at the club reads this forum and is influenced by the majority opinion on things here. Smith no longer playing, Perch dropped, Hughton wearing a suit, starting with two up front yesterday etc. Gotta give Hughton credit for being so willing to change things around. Such a refreshing change from Kinnear, Souness and Roeder. I wouldnt be surprised if it was Hughton himself. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now