This is the Best thread, I've ever been in, dududu dududu

[Guest firetotheworks]

What I dont understand is why he's come in an been given more of a chance than Ranger, despite having shown less than him.

[Mick]

 

That's certainly the way it looks so far.  He's certainly been the weakest of the new arrivals.

 

The weakest so far is either him, Pancrate or Van Aanholt.

[TRon]

Bit of a daft signing really. Not because he's particularly shite as he hasn't had much of a chance to show his worth, but because the likes of Ranger are now out of the picture when he clearly has made an impact whenever he's had some time on the pitch.

[Guest Heneage]

On the one hand he has barely played on the other he is sick of the way we play

Twisting me words man! I mean in the games he's played like today, he was getting in the air or down the line to chase, not one through ball.

[Liam Liam Liam O]

 

That's certainly the way it looks so far.  He's certainly been the weakest of the new arrivals.

 

The weakest so far is either him, Pancrate or Van Aanholt.

 

Don't think Van Aanholt has been particularly bad.  He's far from being a solid defender, but looks a good footballer which the other two certainly don't.

[Dinho lad]

Don't want to have a go at the lad or anything...... but he seems to me like a needless signing.

[Jill]

Don't rate him at all so far.

[Wullie]

 

That's certainly the way it looks so far.  He's certainly been the weakest of the new arrivals.

 

The weakest so far is either him, Pancrate or Van Aanholt.

 

Don't think Van Aanholt has been particularly bad.  He's far from being a solid defender, but looks a good footballer which the other two certainly don't.

 

Pancrate must have at least three or four assists and a cracking goal to his name to be fair to him.

[Mick]

 

Don't think Van Aanholt has been particularly bad.  He's far from being a solid defender, but looks a good footballer which the other two certainly don't.

 

I didn't say he was bad, he's a defender who doesn't look too good at defending, he might be better moving into a more advanced position in future.  We could have played him on the wing today and moved Jonas to cover for Routledge and by doing that we would have kept our balance.

[TRon]

I was disappointed Pancrate didn't start so we could have kept our shape and Guthrie in the middle. Worked out in the end I suppose.

[Liam Liam Liam O]

 

That's certainly the way it looks so far.  He's certainly been the weakest of the new arrivals.

 

The weakest so far is either him, Pancrate or Van Aanholt.

 

Don't think Van Aanholt has been particularly bad.  He's far from being a solid defender, but looks a good footballer which the other two certainly don't.

 

Pancrate must have at least three or four assists and a cracking goal to his name to be fair to him.

 

Fair point.   

 

Fuck knows how though, cos he's shite.

[midds]

Looks poor from what I've seen of him. Nothing about his game looks Premier League. Or Championship for that matter... 

[Amir_9]

The way people highly rate Ranger here, is a bit too over-the-top. Im not impressed with Best in the slightest, both him and Ranger are bench material anyway as far as striking partnerships are concerned, we dont have one by season, we have one by form because our strikers are inconsistent, one week their great, one week their shit (ANDY CARROLL LOL).

 

and currently, as it is, Loven/Carroll partnership is the one in form.

[Liam Liam Liam O]

The way people highly rate Ranger here, is a bit too over-the-top. Im not impressed with Best in the slightest, both him and Ranger are bench material anyway as far as striking partnerships are concerned, we dont have one by season, we have one by form because our strikers are inconsistent, one week their great, one week their shit (ANDY CARROLL LOL).

 

and currently, as it is, Loven/Carroll partnership is the one in form.

 

Now Lovenkrands is most likely out for a few weeks, who would you bring in to replace him?

[jdckelly]

The way people highly rate Ranger here, is a bit too over-the-top. Im not impressed with Best in the slightest, both him and Ranger are bench material anyway as far as striking partnerships are concerned, we dont have one by season, we have one by form because our strikers are inconsistent, one week their great, one week their shit (ANDY CARROLL LOL).

 

and currently, as it is, Loven/Carroll partnership is the one in form.

 

Now Lovenkrands is most likely out for a few weeks, who would you bring in to replace him?

probably best for me with shola out give him a decent run of starts then judge him.

[Mick]

The way people highly rate Ranger here, is a bit too over-the-top. Im not impressed with Best in the slightest, both him and Ranger are bench material anyway as far as striking partnerships are concerned, we dont have one by season, we have one by form because our strikers are inconsistent, one week their great, one week their s*** (ANDY CARROLL LOL).

 

and currently, as it is, Loven/Carroll partnership is the one in form.

 

I have quite a few mates who don't come on here and rate Ranger because of what they've seen in him and think he could improve with games.

[Liam Liam Liam O]

The way people highly rate Ranger here, is a bit too over-the-top. Im not impressed with Best in the slightest, both him and Ranger are bench material anyway as far as striking partnerships are concerned, we dont have one by season, we have one by form because our strikers are inconsistent, one week their great, one week their s*** (ANDY CARROLL LOL).

 

and currently, as it is, Loven/Carroll partnership is the one in form.

 

I have quite a few mates who don't come on here and rate Ranger because of what they've seen in him and think he could improve with games.

 

Fuck off.

[Amir_9]

The way people highly rate Ranger here, is a bit too over-the-top. Im not impressed with Best in the slightest, both him and Ranger are bench material anyway as far as striking partnerships are concerned, we dont have one by season, we have one by form because our strikers are inconsistent, one week their great, one week their s*** (ANDY CARROLL LOL).

 

and currently, as it is, Loven/Carroll partnership is the one in form.

 

Now Lovenkrands is most likely out for a few weeks, who would you bring in to replace him?

 

Best has got 10 league goals this season, albeit far more playing time than Ranger, but knows the league better than Ranger although that hardly really means anything. To be fair id stick with Best, and sub Ranger in at 60 minutes if Best has done nowt. The jury is still out on Best anyway, so far, not so good.

[Wullie]

The way people highly rate Ranger here, is a bit too over-the-top. Im not impressed with Best in the slightest, both him and Ranger are bench material anyway as far as striking partnerships are concerned, we dont have one by season, we have one by form because our strikers are inconsistent, one week their great, one week their shit (ANDY CARROLL LOL).

 

and currently, as it is, Loven/Carroll partnership is the one in form.

 

Ranger's still only 18 though. You can't expect him to be the full package - people do though.

[Mick]

 

f*** off.

 

I don't have as many as you obviously because I don't befriend half of facebook. 

[Liam Liam Liam O]

The way people highly rate Ranger here, is a bit too over-the-top. Im not impressed with Best in the slightest, both him and Ranger are bench material anyway as far as striking partnerships are concerned, we dont have one by season, we have one by form because our strikers are inconsistent, one week their great, one week their s*** (ANDY CARROLL LOL).

 

and currently, as it is, Loven/Carroll partnership is the one in form.

 

Now Lovenkrands is most likely out for a few weeks, who would you bring in to replace him?

 

Best has got 10 league goals this season, albeit far more playing time than Ranger, but knows the league better than Ranger although that hardly really means anything. To be fair id stick with Best, and sub Ranger in at 60 minutes if Best has done nowt. The jury is still out on Best anyway, so far, not so good.

 

Probably a fair assessment, but our manager has had ample opportunity to do the bit in bold & just doesn't seem interested in giving him the chance.

[Amir_9]

The way people highly rate Ranger here, is a bit too over-the-top. Im not impressed with Best in the slightest, both him and Ranger are bench material anyway as far as striking partnerships are concerned, we dont have one by season, we have one by form because our strikers are inconsistent, one week their great, one week their s*** (ANDY CARROLL LOL).

 

and currently, as it is, Loven/Carroll partnership is the one in form.

 

Now Lovenkrands is most likely out for a few weeks, who would you bring in to replace him?

 

Best has got 10 league goals this season, albeit far more playing time than Ranger, but knows the league better than Ranger although that hardly really means anything. To be fair id stick with Best, and sub Ranger in at 60 minutes if Best has done nowt. The jury is still out on Best anyway, so far, not so good.

 

Probably a fair assessment, but our manager has had ample opportunity to do the bit in bold & just doesn't seem interested in giving him the chance.

 

Well, for starters it depends on how long Lovenkrands is out, if its lets say for a month, Id say give Best two games with the 60 minute exception, if he still does nothing special, start with Ranger, Shola should be back by then tho.

[toontownman]

Best and Carroll are far to similar to be playing together, it wasnt working again today, one of them needs to be doing something different, I hope Hughton and Calderwood are on this.

[Ronaldo]

We need Shola back now.

[hakka]

We need Shola back now.

 

True.  Just hope when he is back that he isn't suddenly injured again after 3 and half games.