Super Duper Branko Strupar Posted May 24, 2011 Share Posted May 24, 2011 I thought it was, I wasn't biting at the picture, it was their fucking comments Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baggio Posted May 24, 2011 Share Posted May 24, 2011 Here's the original. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1055760/Breaking-point-Under-Ashley-puts-crisis-club-Newcastle-sale.html Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cp40 Posted May 24, 2011 Share Posted May 24, 2011 Malcolm's dug up some article from SkySports with quotes from Bruce saying he's looking at a few Bosman's. Opened a real can of worms. They're calling up and aren't happy for him mocking them. http://www.readytogo.net/smb/showthread.php?t=595169 gloating quickly turns to Panic on the streets of Sunderland :lol: :lol: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted May 24, 2011 Share Posted May 24, 2011 Like we'd ever use the phrase "Top Dogs" ffs. They're the sad cunts who released a DVD with that title, not us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cp40 Posted May 24, 2011 Share Posted May 24, 2011 Like we'd ever use the phrase "Top Dogs" ffs. They're the sad cunts who released a DVD with that title not us. over my life we have finnished above them at a guess more than 75% of the time, and i have never heard the term Top Dogs Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elliottman Posted May 24, 2011 Share Posted May 24, 2011 Malcolm's dug up some article from SkySports with quotes from Bruce saying he's looking at a few Bosman's. Opened a real can of worms. They're calling up and aren't happy for him mocking them. http://www.readytogo.net/smb/showthread.php?t=595169 gloating quickly turns to Panic on the streets of Sunderland :lol: :lol: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarrenBartonCentrePartin Posted May 24, 2011 Share Posted May 24, 2011 Like we'd ever use the phrase "Top Dogs" ffs. They're the sad c***s who released a DVD with that title, not us. Thought that. They're f***ing obsessed with using that title. More like fucking 'Rabid Dogs' Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Wearside Posted May 24, 2011 Share Posted May 24, 2011 Malcolm's dug up some article from SkySports with quotes from Bruce saying he's looking at a few Bosman's. Opened a real can of worms. They're calling up and aren't happy for him mocking them. Malcolm MacDonald - The oracle on all things Sunderland. We heard all this last summer,sold Cana and then Jones and all we heard was how skint we were then bang we smashed our transfer record on Gyan. MacDonald never stops going on about how much money we spend and now because we are looking at a couple of free players he is still going on,can't win. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fugazi Posted May 24, 2011 Share Posted May 24, 2011 They all talk utter shite on there anyway, SuperMac can barely string a sentence together. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted May 24, 2011 Share Posted May 24, 2011 We weren't laughing at the legitimacy of his insight mate, but the meltdown of mongs wound up by it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarrenBartonCentrePartin Posted May 24, 2011 Share Posted May 24, 2011 We weren't laughing at the legitimacy of his insight mate, but the meltdown of mongs wound up by it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoreboard82 Posted May 24, 2011 Share Posted May 24, 2011 :lol theres a mackem on legends mocking us for the banner- the one they made on photoshop thickestbastards Meanwhile, umpteen FTM banners can be seen at most SAFC games. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted May 24, 2011 Share Posted May 24, 2011 It's sad that they are so desperate for us to lower ourselves to their level they have resorted to Photoshopping our banners. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest johnson293 Posted May 25, 2011 Share Posted May 25, 2011 Boo Hoo... the mackems have finished higher than us in another league table too... the 'Value for Money League' http://fcbusiness.co.uk/news/article/newsitem=1196/title=man+city+tops+value+league Them 9th... Us, 17th! Strange that, when Disco Pants had to go out locally with the begging bowl, if they are such good value for money, and loads of their supporters would prefer to watch home matches in the pub?! EDIT: Forgot to add this... http://img227.imageshack.us/img227/7830/8594display.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Spaceman Posted May 25, 2011 Share Posted May 25, 2011 Best Value Players 16. James Perch Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted May 25, 2011 Share Posted May 25, 2011 Man City top? What a load of shit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattypnufc Posted May 25, 2011 Share Posted May 25, 2011 That article lost any sort of legitimate insight when it listed James Pearch as the 16th best value player in the league. It also fails to mention how the come to any sort of formula to determine entertainment. Blackburn 'fucking' Rovers are 3rd man. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cp40 Posted May 25, 2011 Share Posted May 25, 2011 The fact they are making so much noise about finnishing above is all about papering over the crfacks for them. they are shitting themselves, at the rate we have improved vs the rate they are failing , we have caught them in one season and should comfortably pass them next. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Wearside Posted May 25, 2011 Share Posted May 25, 2011 The fact they are making so much noise about finnishing above is all about papering over the crfacks for them. they are shitting themselves, at the rate we have improved vs the rate they are failing , we have caught them in one season and should comfortably pass them next. Brilliant,simply brilliant.I don't even know where to begin with that post. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
brummie Posted May 25, 2011 Share Posted May 25, 2011 When we signed Darren Bent: "Why's he going from a top six side to a struggling club?" (ignoring the fact that the top six isn't decided in January, although, in fairness, when you've been in it for about three weeks of the last 25 years, ignorance of this fact is somewhat understandable) "He's going to look a right idiot when we finish above Villa" I can't help but notice the final table shows: 1. Sunderland not troubling the top six. 2. Sunderland below Villa, despite us having a nightmare season. So, basically, bollocks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lush Vlad Posted May 25, 2011 Share Posted May 25, 2011 I was going to say, I couldn't see any sort of formula for how they worked it out. Didn't think my ST was bad value for money, when you consider some of the high scoring games we've had this season. Mine was £429 for L7, as I live down south I haven't been to all the games, but I've seen the following scores at SJP. 6-0 Villa 0-2 Blackpool 2-2 Wigan 5-1 sunderland 5-0 West Ham 4-4 Arsenal 1-1 Bolton 1-2 Everton 4-1 Wolves 2-1 Brum 3-3 WBA Around £40 a game and I missed 8 home matches. I got to see 50 goals and spank our rivals 5-1, I'd say that's fucking cracking value me self Blackburn might pay about a tenner a game, still wouldn't call them entertaining, they're terrible to watch. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarrenBartonCentrePartin Posted May 25, 2011 Share Posted May 25, 2011 Malcolm (!) made a good point vs. one mackem on the legends last night. Following an argument about Bruce signing free players/finishing higher/5-1, Malcolm asked him how many new players he hoped for. The reply was 6. Malcolm pointed out they've got 5 going back from loan deals, and Zenden leaving. So 6 would just be enough to cover that, adding no further depth. Mackem couldn't say much more than 'well yes'. Its going to be hard for them to replace their outgoings, considering pretty much all were either in the first XI or on the bench. Its not like they're losing real bit-part players. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest johnson293 Posted May 25, 2011 Share Posted May 25, 2011 Malcolm (!) made a good point vs. one mackem on the legends last night. Following an argument about Bruce signing free players/finishing higher/5-1, Malcolm asked him how many new players he hoped for. The reply was 6. Malcolm pointed out they've got 5 going back from loan deals, and Zenden leaving. So 6 would just be enough to cover that, adding no further depth. Mackem couldn't say much more than 'well yes'. Its going to be hard for them to replace their outgoings, considering pretty much all were either in the first XI or on the bench. Its not like they're losing real bit-part players. As well as replacing the loanies/leavers, they may also need to replace the injured ones who may not be fit for the start of next season too. So that's another 2 or 3? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incognito Posted May 25, 2011 Share Posted May 25, 2011 I'm sure they could get half a chair to replace David Meyler. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gash Posted May 25, 2011 Share Posted May 25, 2011 That fucking 'article' they can't even spell Wilshere right, fucking mongs. FUCK OFF. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts