Guest Flatline Posted June 9, 2011 Share Posted June 9, 2011 Fergie hardly sells good players (Stam is the exception). He obviously deems them surplus to requirements. McGrath, Beckham, Van Nistelrooy, Pique are a few he has sold. Add in Ince and Kanchelskis. Haha, Kanchelskis what the f*** did he do after leaving Man Utd f*** all. I'd say only Stam and Pique were mistakes, and Pique wanted to leave. He wouldnt have gotten as much first team football as when he was there Ferdinand was at his peak and Vidic was an incredibly strong player. Stam only left cos of a bust-up with the Nevilles iirc. didnt he call them a pair of busy c***s? McGrath was a pisshead and Fergie getting rid of the booze culture enabled to club to move up a level and win a dozen titles. He ultimately built a better more fluid side after RVN leaving, as good as he was. Kanchelskis was replaced with Beckham, speaks for itself despite kanchelskis doing well for everton. Ince leaving opened allowed Scholes-Keane midfield to form. Beckham was declining as a player and wanting to faff around in central midfield, fergie bought Ronaldo in as a replacement a few months later. probably one of his best transitions ever. that's the thing with SAF, he is always on the look out to rebuild and replenish the side, moving with the times, shifting deadwood and bringing in new talent. that's what sets him apart from someone like Mourinho, who has this kind of scorched earth policy of win at all costs in the short term and to hell with the long term. and that's why he lets players go, he has a very good instinct for transitioning his teams into new eras. agree with everything you said except that tbh.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted June 9, 2011 Share Posted June 9, 2011 Ngog has rejected Sunderland apparently Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ketsbaia Posted June 9, 2011 Share Posted June 9, 2011 Ngog has rejected Sunderland apparently Oh that better not be true. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted June 9, 2011 Share Posted June 9, 2011 http://www.liverpoolfcnews.net/ngog-will-not-be-going-to-sunderland/ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest toonlass Posted June 9, 2011 Share Posted June 9, 2011 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted June 9, 2011 Share Posted June 9, 2011 don't know whether to laugh or weep that hes not going there Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PENKAAA Posted June 9, 2011 Share Posted June 9, 2011 So does that mean Sunderland will get more cash if they aren't getting a player as part of the deal? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted June 9, 2011 Share Posted June 9, 2011 He's a decent striker, would certainly improve them however the fee could be better spent, but after seeing who Bruce went straight in for (3 mancs) then it's probably a good thing as he'll buy someone utter fuking dire. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted June 9, 2011 Share Posted June 9, 2011 That's actually quite funny. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest johnson293 Posted June 9, 2011 Share Posted June 9, 2011 According to Liverpool Echo, it'll now be a £16m straight cash deal. http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/liverpool-fc/liverpool-fc-news/2011/06/09/jordan-henderson-set-to-sign-for-liverpool-fc-today-100252-28847564/ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted June 9, 2011 Share Posted June 9, 2011 Imagine being rejected by N'Gog Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Roger Kint Posted June 9, 2011 Share Posted June 9, 2011 Imagine being rejected by N'Gog Cant work out if its a very lucky escape or a massive insult.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ObiChrisKenobi Posted June 9, 2011 Share Posted June 9, 2011 Man, Sunderland dodged a bullet there like. Could be a good bit of business for them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted June 9, 2011 Share Posted June 9, 2011 £16m? That means they've been well ripped off thinking they'd get £20m for him part ex. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest johnson293 Posted June 9, 2011 Share Posted June 9, 2011 According to various people on twitter, Brown and Gibson have agreed terms with Sunderland, but no word on O'Shea. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted June 9, 2011 Share Posted June 9, 2011 How come they get a decent amount of money yet try to get 3 has beens? Not one of them would I welcome here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexf Posted June 9, 2011 Share Posted June 9, 2011 with £20m we bid for gameiro, gervinho/n'zogbia and they go for gibson brown and o'shea. But ofcourse they are NE Top Dogs! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baggio Posted June 9, 2011 Share Posted June 9, 2011 with £20m we bid for gameiro, gervinho/n'zogbia and they go for gibson brown and o'shea. But ofcourse they are NE Top Dogs! We've got to convince them to come here first. Perhaps Sunderland are more realistic about what they can attract. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BottledDog Posted June 9, 2011 Share Posted June 9, 2011 with £20m we bid for gameiro, gervinho/n'zogbia and they go for gibson brown and o'shea. But ofcourse they are NE Top Dogs! We've got to convince them to come here first. Perhaps Sunderland are more realistic about what they can attract. A fair point. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Venkman Posted June 9, 2011 Share Posted June 9, 2011 Imagine being rejected by N'Gog Cant work out if its a very lucky escape or a massive insult.... both? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexf Posted June 9, 2011 Share Posted June 9, 2011 with £20m we bid for gameiro, gervinho/n'zogbia and they go for gibson brown and o'shea. But ofcourse they are NE Top Dogs! We've got to convince them to come here first. Perhaps Sunderland are more realistic about what they can attract. I'd like to think our backups if we fail with those bids are still better than that lot though, don't rate any of them. Thought Brown was decent at RB about 3 years ago and Gibson occasionally hits a belter but still don't think they would do well if we signed them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted June 9, 2011 Share Posted June 9, 2011 How come they get a decent amount of money yet try to get 3 has beens? Not one of them would I welcome here. Gibbson a has been? Wtf. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted June 9, 2011 Share Posted June 9, 2011 Gibson's a hasneverbeenandneverwillbe. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted June 9, 2011 Share Posted June 9, 2011 How come they get a decent amount of money yet try to get 3 has beens? Not one of them would I welcome here. Gibbson a has been? Wtf. Howay man, the old cunt is 23. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sifu Posted June 9, 2011 Share Posted June 9, 2011 Imagine being rejected by N'Gog Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts