Jump to content

The Liverpool Thread


Parky

Recommended Posts

Guest neesy111

We wouldn't have finished 2nd under Keegan, fwiw. And anyone suggesting we'd have finished top needs their head flushing down the bog.

 

Daglish deserves a fair bit of credit for the 2nd place and the cup final a year later.

 

 

 

Complete rubbish.  It was only a late run at the end of the season that got us into 2nd and in Keegan's last 2 league games we had just beaten Spurs 7-1 and Leeds 3-0.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We wouldn't have finished 2nd under Keegan, fwiw. And anyone suggesting we'd have finished top needs their head flushing down the bog.

 

Daglish deserves a fair bit of credit for the 2nd place and the cup final a year later.

 

 

 

Complete rubbish.  It was only a late run at the end of the season that got us into 2nd and in Keegan's last 2 league games we had just beaten Spurs 7-1 and Leeds 3-0.

 

We were also 4th when he left.  Both managers played their part that season, with Keegan's squad.

 

http://www.statto.com/football/stats/england/premier-league/1996-1997/table/1997-01-01

Link to post
Share on other sites

We wouldn't have finished 2nd under Keegan, fwiw. And anyone suggesting we'd have finished top needs their head flushing down the bog.

 

Daglish deserves a fair bit of credit for the 2nd place and the cup final a year later.

 

 

 

Complete rubbish.  It was only a late run at the end of the season that got us into 2nd and in Keegan's last 2 league games we had just beaten Spurs 7-1 and Leeds 3-0.

 

Again, relevance? There is none.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest neesy111

Relevance is if Dalglish was responsible for us finishing 2nd. He made us drop 11 places the following season...

 

He was partly responsible for it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dalglish couldn't bear the thought of building a successful team with Keegan's players.

 

Did he get the chance, though? Ferdinand was sold, Shearer was injured, Ginola wanted to be in London, Beardsley was done, and Rob Lee was probably past his best too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Btw, this day in 1997, Dalglish was confirmed as our manager. Destroyed one of our greatest ever teams.

 

The only positive thing i can think of regarding Dalglish is that he bought Given....

 

Thats it.

 

And Solano and Speed. but yeah that is it.

 

Didi Hamman as well

 

DIDI FUCKING HAMMAN!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dalglish couldn't bear the thought of building a successful team with Keegan's players.

 

Did he get the chance, though? Ferdinand was sold, Shearer was injured, Ginola wanted to be in London, Beardsley was done, and Rob Lee was probably past his best too.

albert and howey were startting to show the injuries that would realsitically ruin theur careers, asprilla picked up a long term injury. imo the reason keegan left in the first place was that he saw a massive overhaul was needed and also saw that the money wasn't there to do it and that was the position dalglish took over.
Link to post
Share on other sites

This is gonna be interesting. At what point will he lose the Kop? :lol:

 

He's a very, very long way from that. He's King Kenny.

 

A lot of the criticism is placed elsewhere (Comolli and the board cop the stick for the silly prices paid, which is kind of fair, seeing as it likely was their doing), and Kenny only really gets criticised for getting his tactics and selection wrong in individual matches.

 

That said, I get the impression that anyone calling for Kenny to be replaced on RAWK would incur the ban hammer, so it's hard to gauge the actual level of support.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is gonna be interesting. At what point will he lose the Kop? :lol:

 

He's a very, very long way from that. He's King Kenny.

 

A lot of the criticism is placed elsewhere (Comolli and the board cop the stick for the silly prices paid, which is kind of fair, seeing as it likely was their doing), and Kenny only really gets criticised for getting his tactics and selection wrong in individual matches.

 

That said, I get the impression that anyone calling for Kenny to be replaced on RAWK would incur the ban hammer, so it's hard to gauge the actual level of support.

 

I guessed the blame would in the first instance be apportioned to the board and so on...But you can't sack the board innit? So you see its like spin the bottle...You have to kiss the gay looking bloke at some point. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is gonna be interesting. At what point will he lose the Kop? :lol:

 

He's a very, very long way from that. He's King Kenny.

 

A lot of the criticism is placed elsewhere (Comolli and the board cop the stick for the silly prices paid, which is kind of fair, seeing as it likely was their doing), and Kenny only really gets criticised for getting his tactics and selection wrong in individual matches.

 

That said, I get the impression that anyone calling for Kenny to be replaced on RAWK would incur the ban hammer, so it's hard to gauge the actual level of support.

 

Not sure about that, tbh. A manager who pursues young British players from rivals/clubs within the same division (ought to) know he will be racking up a hefty transfer receipt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...