Sifu Posted February 6, 2012 Share Posted February 6, 2012 Can honestly see him "being made an example of". The shite he's come out with during this trial man, there really is some dodgyness there. Rosie 47 ffs! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chubby Jason Posted February 6, 2012 Share Posted February 6, 2012 A jury would have no compelling reason to make an example of him. I can see an acquittal to be honest. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted February 6, 2012 Share Posted February 6, 2012 http://img849.imageshack.us/img849/2056/83496565.png Love this me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghandis Flip-Flop Posted February 6, 2012 Share Posted February 6, 2012 On 06/02/2012 at 11:47, Northerngimp said: I still cant see the tax rat being sent down. Lester Piggot and Ken Dodd dislike this Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Venkman Posted February 6, 2012 Share Posted February 6, 2012 On 06/02/2012 at 16:08, Chubby for Liverpool said: A jury would have no compelling reason to make an example of him. I can see an acquittal to be honest. they just decide whether he's guilty or not though surely? i can certainly see a judge being under some political pressure to sentence him properly, which would be jail time for the amounts involved. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ianovthetoon Posted February 6, 2012 Share Posted February 6, 2012 On 06/02/2012 at 16:22, Dr Venkman said: Quote A jury would have no compelling reason to make an example of him. I can see an acquittal to be honest. they just decide whether he's guilty or not though surely? i can certainly see a judge being under some political pressure to sentence him properly, which would be jail time for the amounts involved. Absolutely. It could go either way really. Depends how much the jury have fallen for his shite excuses. That in turn will also hinge on the Judge's summing up...... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 6, 2012 Share Posted February 6, 2012 Unlucky. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted February 6, 2012 Share Posted February 6, 2012 Will not be at Anfield tonight Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
54 Posted February 6, 2012 Share Posted February 6, 2012 http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/11095/7492556/Case-against-Redknapp-repugnant- Sounds like there defence is very weak. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
54 Posted February 7, 2012 Share Posted February 7, 2012 The one thing i hate about this case is that here is massive nativity behind it, like everyone just expects him to get away with it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BottledDog Posted February 7, 2012 Share Posted February 7, 2012 On 07/02/2012 at 10:23, NUFC54 said: The one thing i hate about this case is that here is massive nativity behind it, like everyone just expects him to get away with it. http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/12/18/article-2075757-0F36EEF700000578-0_634x454.jpg Guilty! Praise be! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MW Posted February 7, 2012 Share Posted February 7, 2012 Judge tells jury there's a scenario where they can find Harry Redknapp not guilty and Milan Mandaric guilty. They must not find Redknapp guilty and Mandaric not guilty. Judge says both Redknapp and Mandaric are of 'good character' and tells jury that might mean more likely they should believe their evidence." Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted February 7, 2012 Share Posted February 7, 2012 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest gggg Posted February 7, 2012 Share Posted February 7, 2012 Judge has got his bung. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
54 Posted February 7, 2012 Share Posted February 7, 2012 On 07/02/2012 at 11:27, MW said: Judge tells jury there's a scenario where they can find Harry Redknapp not guilty and Milan Mandaric guilty. They must not find Redknapp guilty and Mandaric not guilty. Judge says both Redknapp and Mandaric are of 'good character' and tells jury that might mean more likely they should believe their evidence." What a joke. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
toon25 Posted February 7, 2012 Share Posted February 7, 2012 Amazing what a cheeky grin, a wink (spasm), and a bit of cockney charm can do for you these days. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted February 7, 2012 Share Posted February 7, 2012 On 07/02/2012 at 11:40, NUFC54 said: Quote Judge tells jury there's a scenario where they can find Harry Redknapp not guilty and Milan Mandaric guilty. They must not find Redknapp guilty and Mandaric not guilty. Judge says both Redknapp and Mandaric are of 'good character' and tells jury that might mean more likely they should believe their evidence." What a joke. Not really, it's about payments made and received. Saggy face canny be guilty and mm not it just logically cannot work. The other way round yes, through naivety. The last part though is a joke, he'll get away with it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Geordie Posted February 7, 2012 Share Posted February 7, 2012 Well, looks like the judge is on the payroll then! He's gonna get away with it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AliGupter Posted February 7, 2012 Share Posted February 7, 2012 The verdict is today yes? Any idea of the sort of time? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted February 7, 2012 Share Posted February 7, 2012 Jury have been sent out to consider verdict. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted February 7, 2012 Share Posted February 7, 2012 Got to be unanimous verdict. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted February 7, 2012 Share Posted February 7, 2012 I'd be no good for jury duty, I'd say he's guilty just so I could watch the fallout. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted February 7, 2012 Share Posted February 7, 2012 On 07/02/2012 at 12:40, Toon's Taylor said: I'd be no good for jury duty, I'd say he's guilty just so I could watch the fallout. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deputy Dawg UK Posted February 7, 2012 Share Posted February 7, 2012 On 07/02/2012 at 12:36, neesy111 said: Got to be unanimous verdict. Well it doesn't have to be...Can go on judges directions for a 10-2 after a certain period of time Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted February 7, 2012 Share Posted February 7, 2012 What will he get if found guilty? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts