Thespence Posted September 26, 2010 Share Posted September 26, 2010 Attendance is 41,915 btw. Poor but then people like me dont help as I dont go to games that are on SKY or ESPN now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
La Parka Posted September 26, 2010 Share Posted September 26, 2010 We need to get the ball into feet and space. Shola is much better on the ground imo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted September 26, 2010 Share Posted September 26, 2010 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted September 26, 2010 Share Posted September 26, 2010 Attendance is 41,915 btw. Shame Neesy couldn't make it. Why is that? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raconteur Posted September 26, 2010 Share Posted September 26, 2010 Think shola would offer more than carrol in this game (tinhat) I think I agree with you actually. Lovenkrands would offer more with the balls BA can play. I can hear Ronaldo coming Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Posted September 26, 2010 Share Posted September 26, 2010 Attendance is 41,915 btw. Pretty poor was expecting around 44 thousand tbh. Shame you couldn't be arsed eh? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anderson Posted September 26, 2010 Share Posted September 26, 2010 Poor, but expected on a Sunday afternoon when it's on Sky. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MKSC Posted September 26, 2010 Share Posted September 26, 2010 Should teams like stoke be banned from football, because if I were a neutral I would of switched off that match after 15 mins. We might not like it but there is no law against playing shite football. If the manager can get the players, board and supporters to buy what they are selling then good luck to them. If everyone played the same way football would not be as interesting. And tbf, we've served up some awful dross in our time. Nothing on the scale of that. This is an entertainment business, if all teams played like Stoke their would be nee-one willing to pay to watch the fucker. No it isn't. It's a game of football. If I want entertaining I'll watch the latest tv series on sky 1 or go to the cinema. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chicago_shearer Posted September 26, 2010 Share Posted September 26, 2010 I wouldn't change a thing unless Pulis has a plan B in the second half. We have total control of the midfield and lots of space. If Stoke want to keep men behind the ball and let us pass it around without creating that many chances, then it suits us fine. If Stoke show some sort of interest in a counter attack or generally playing football, then maybe some changes might benefit us. Otherwise, things are looking good. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted September 26, 2010 Share Posted September 26, 2010 Fucking hell, me dad's on the telly. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomson Mouse Posted September 26, 2010 Share Posted September 26, 2010 Wouldn't surprise me if we play better second half. Stoke have to actually come out and commit. Would be surprised if the did that, can see them doing the same again until about the 70th min when they'll bring Delap on and bombard our goal for the last 20 or so to get a draw. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
spizz energi Posted September 26, 2010 Share Posted September 26, 2010 Hope we can hang onto this, can't see us getting anything at City next week. And who thought it was a good idea to have Butt in the studio? He's got the charisma of Hitler's missing bollock. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted September 26, 2010 Share Posted September 26, 2010 Fucking hell, me dad's on the telly. Your dad is Peter Beardsley? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted September 26, 2010 Share Posted September 26, 2010 Should teams like stoke be banned from football, because if I were a neutral I would of switched off that match after 15 mins. We might not like it but there is no law against playing shite football. If the manager can get the players, board and supporters to buy what they are selling then good luck to them. If everyone played the same way football would not be as interesting. And tbf, we've served up some awful dross in our time. Nothing on the scale of that. This is an entertainment business, if all teams played like Stoke their would be nee-one willing to pay to watch the fucker. No it isn't. It's a game of football. If I want entertaining I'll watch the latest tv series on sky 1 or go to the cinema. It's an entertainment business now, people go to be entertained because football is now imo a middle class sport to go and watch now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted September 26, 2010 Share Posted September 26, 2010 irish radio commenting on the fact we came out as a unit stoke in 1 or 2s Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted September 26, 2010 Share Posted September 26, 2010 Fucking hell, me dad's on the telly. Your dad is Peter Beardsley? Yeah. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted September 26, 2010 Share Posted September 26, 2010 The 2nd half can only be better. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
spizz energi Posted September 26, 2010 Share Posted September 26, 2010 Nice of sky sports to give us peasants a free day but I'd forgotten how much of a complete dickwipe Andy Gray is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted September 26, 2010 Share Posted September 26, 2010 Does Stoke have a player called Joey on the pitch? Saw Pulis 1st half shouting for Joey several times trying to catch his attention...can't be wor Joey surely? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chicago_shearer Posted September 26, 2010 Share Posted September 26, 2010 The 2nd half can only be better. We had all the possession, lots of space, and a 1-0 lead. I'd say it could get much worse. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thespence Posted September 26, 2010 Share Posted September 26, 2010 "Peter Beardsley massive in the North East" League titles as Liverpool, rare transfer from Anfield to Goodison & played, scored & captained England ffs, he is hardly Pavel Srnicek who is only massive in the NE. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
spizz energi Posted September 26, 2010 Share Posted September 26, 2010 Does Stoke have a player called Joey on the pitch? Saw Pulis 1st half shouting for Joey several times trying to catch his attention...can't be wor Joey surely? Calling Huth a Joey Deacon probably... [/eighties] Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Memphis Posted September 26, 2010 Share Posted September 26, 2010 Our team-wide level of comfort on the ball is such a pleasure to watch. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted September 26, 2010 Share Posted September 26, 2010 "Peter Beardsley massive in the North East" League titles as Liverpool, rare transfer from Anfield to Goodison & played, scored & captained England ffs, he is hardly Pavel Srnicek who is only massive in the NE. Beardsley is one of the best English players ever imo, so he's pretty well known nationally. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MKSC Posted September 26, 2010 Share Posted September 26, 2010 Should teams like stoke be banned from football, because if I were a neutral I would of switched off that match after 15 mins. We might not like it but there is no law against playing shite football. If the manager can get the players, board and supporters to buy what they are selling then good luck to them. If everyone played the same way football would not be as interesting. And tbf, we've served up some awful dross in our time. Nothing on the scale of that. This is an entertainment business, if all teams played like Stoke their would be nee-one willing to pay to watch the fucker. No it isn't. It's a game of football. If I want entertaining I'll watch the latest tv series on sky 1 or go to the cinema. It's an entertainment business now, people go to be entertained because football is now imo a middle class sport to go and watch now. Your opinion is wrong. Only idiot commentators think that footballers should be offering entertainment. People go to football to support the team that they love and they'll do that regardless of how entertaining it is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now