tmonkey Posted January 8, 2012 Share Posted January 8, 2012 Mancini is high. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skeletor Posted January 8, 2012 Share Posted January 8, 2012 This is one awkward interview Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sifu Posted January 8, 2012 Share Posted January 8, 2012 This interview is going well. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiLvOR Posted January 8, 2012 Share Posted January 8, 2012 Mancini Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
David28 Posted January 8, 2012 Share Posted January 8, 2012 What did he say? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tmonkey Posted January 8, 2012 Share Posted January 8, 2012 You can see a bit of coke around Mancini's nose. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aussiemag Posted January 8, 2012 Share Posted January 8, 2012 James Tarvenier starting in midfield for Sheffield Wednesday.  Got good feedback last time.  Aye played right midfield and did very well form the match reports.  Encouraging. Could he be seen as a backup to our right full back (Santon), if Simpson is in fact sold. Edit: meaning next season Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDT Posted January 8, 2012 Share Posted January 8, 2012 Barry Fry Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted January 8, 2012 Share Posted January 8, 2012 I'm all for romance and sentiment in football, but what is it with club's bringing back old players when it clearly isn't that great an option?  The Scholes sub was just bizarre. Had it been a different person altogether with the exact same ability, people would be like, "the fuck?" For one thing, he's fucking seven months short of match fitness! And they bring him on in a colossal game where there's every possibility of losing the lead? Mental. I was almost glad when he fucked up for City's second. The Paul Scholes of old would have known exactly what was within ten-square-metres of him before that throw had even been taken, and Manu would've retained possession. That's called a lack of match-sharpness. Manu were lucky today. They've still got problems, namely at CM and CB - and Scholes isn't the answer. Henry is probably going to be exactly the same. A great player in his day, but by all accounts has tailed off tremendously. Is the sole purpose of these signings to give the crowd a momentary buzz when they come off the bench? Plain odd. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted January 8, 2012 Share Posted January 8, 2012 What happened in Mancini's interview? Missed it... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted January 8, 2012 Share Posted January 8, 2012 What happened in Mancini's interview? Missed it... Â Reporter trying to put words into his mouth, he wasn't having any of it like. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sifu Posted January 8, 2012 Share Posted January 8, 2012 I'm all for romance and sentiment in football, but what is it with club's bringing back old players when it clearly isn't that great an option?  The Scholes sub was just bizarre. Had it been a different person altogether with the exact same ability, people would be like, "the f***?" For one thing, he's f***ing seven months short of match fitness! And they bring him on in a colossal game where there's every possibility of losing the lead? Mental. I was almost glad when he f***ed up for City's second. The Paul Scholes of old would have known exactly what was within ten-square-metres of him before that throw had even been taken, and Manu would've retained possession. That's called a lack of match-sharpness. Manu were lucky today. They've still got problems, namely at CM and CB - and Scholes isn't the answer. Henry is probably going to be exactly the same. A great player in his day, but by all accounts has tailed off tremendously. Is the sole purpose of these signings to give the crowd a momentary buzz when they come off the bench? Plain odd.  I posted this in the "Other clubs' transfers" thread: Got this text from my Man U supporting mate when I texted him about Scholes being back (and Man U's lack of money): Scholes is worth more then any player we could sign  Blind loyalty tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted January 8, 2012 Share Posted January 8, 2012 James Tarvenier starting in midfield for Sheffield Wednesday.  Got good feedback last time.  Aye played right midfield and did very well form the match reports.  Encouraging. Could he be seen as a backup to our right full back (Santon), if Simpson is in fact sold. Edit: meaning next season  Kid does look like he has a good future, love to see home grown kids in the team me (i know he came from Leeds very earlier on but still). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarrenBartonCentrePartin Posted January 8, 2012 Share Posted January 8, 2012 just got in. Mackems actually not playing a striker again I see. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest gggg Posted January 8, 2012 Share Posted January 8, 2012 Neither would I if Bendtner was the best option. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted January 8, 2012 Share Posted January 8, 2012 "Martin O'Neill's miracle workers" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted January 8, 2012 Share Posted January 8, 2012 An advert for Chlamydia during the mackem game, how fitting. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest gggg Posted January 8, 2012 Share Posted January 8, 2012 The state of those fat mackems. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarrenBartonCentrePartin Posted January 8, 2012 Share Posted January 8, 2012 gonna be no commentary for this? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted January 8, 2012 Share Posted January 8, 2012 Is there any commentary Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 8, 2012 Share Posted January 8, 2012 gonna be no commentary for this? Â Hopefully. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ishmael Posted January 8, 2012 Share Posted January 8, 2012 ITV are shit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest gggg Posted January 8, 2012 Share Posted January 8, 2012 http://yfrog.com/hsdqbcoj Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BlacknWhiteArmy Posted January 8, 2012 Share Posted January 8, 2012 Better with no commentary. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doctor Zaius Posted January 8, 2012 Share Posted January 8, 2012 ITV fucking up again. No commentary/ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts