What would the majority prefer?

[Guest ToonUltra]

Just a general census on this....dunno why. Bored i guess.

[gbandit]

I'm not a long-time member of the board but it's always been this way since I started viewing it in October time last year. Sure it's been like this for a long time too and it's never caused any problems. I absolutely hate loads of new threads which just have bits and pieces in them. It's the way it is for a reason and that's because it's far more efficient.

[Sifu]

A single thread about the player.

[Lush Vlad]

Player's name on it's own with the odd title change.  Can't stand multiple topics and it could easily end up like the RTG sack of shite.  One reason I started using this forum was the one thread for each player/subject, think it's a good idea.

[Revolution Number 9]

One thread one subject, much better system IMO.

[Sifu]

Player's name on it's own with the odd title change.  Can't stand multiple topics and it could easily end up like the RTG sack of s****.  One reason I started using this forum was the one thread for each player/subject, think it's a good idea.

 

[ponsaelius]

This system is much better. It's one of the major reasons why this forum is easy to navigate, efficient and streamlined in comparison to mongfests like RTG.

 

When something happens the thread title is changed as an update to the discussion.

[Conjo]

One thread with updated thread title if something special happens (i.e. player get injured).

[Colocho]

It's fine the way it is. A post about Davide Santon goes in the Davide Santon thread.

 

Perhaps there could be an injuries sticky that gets updated every now and then, much like Dave did with players we were linked to during the transfer window?

[Guest BlacknWhiteArmy]

Player's name on it's own with the odd title change.  Can't stand multiple topics and it could easily end up like the RTG sack of shite.  One reason I started using this forum was the one thread for each player/subject, think it's a good idea.

 

Exactly. Far far better.

[KDT]

one thread per player, see no reason to have a number of threads about the same subject

[54]

When i origianally answered the question I went for number 2 but now I understand the question i would defiantly go for number 1.

[TBG]

One Thread to rule them all, One Thread to find them,

One Thread to bring them all and in the darkness bind them

 

[Geordie Ahmed]

The one thread is fine, works much better BUT it would be helpful if the thread title could be modified when/if some new development takes place

[Dinho lad]

You could appoint more moderators to increase the chances of one or two being on-line when something happens.

 

Not that it is really a big deal or anything.

[ponsaelius]

Conclusive or would you like a re-count?

[Guest ToonUltra]

No problem with views at all. I logged on here and there was no new threads or title changes so didnt really know what was gannin on. Went onto .cock and found out the craic regarding Santon.

 

That was the only reason im asking, just think its easier if you can log on find sumet thats maybe new and click on it. Rather than going to the last page of posts, and backtracking to catch the story...

[Guest BlacknWhiteArmy]

1 vote.

[Guest ToonUltra]

1 vote?

[teohgk]

Conclusive or would you like a re-count?

 

 

[wormy]

The way it is now, much, much better.

[Guest ToonUltra]

inconclusive.....

[Stu]

Shouldn't this be in chat?

[TRon]

Shouldn't this be in chat?

 

Start a new thread and let's vote on it

[Ishmael]

A single thread about the player.

 

with thread title updates as appropriate.