Jump to content

Papiss Cissé


Recommended Posts

It's time to get rid, he's never going to get back to the heights of his first 6 months here or anywhere close to that. I'm sure there would be a buying in Germany or Turkey for him, I'd take anything around £5m.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 16/12/2013 at 11:31, Teasy said:

  Quote

I don't think there's any way we'll get £15m for him.  Unless they sack Allardyce and appoint Dalglish maybe.

 

Its very unlikely, I'd be amazed if we did, but I suppose West Ham's owners are insane and Allardyce isn't exactly one to care about club funds so you never know.  I mean £17m for Andy Carroll in the state him and Liverpool were is was quite incredible.

 

£15m for Cisse now would be worse than £35 for Carroll at the time imo. How on earth he could warrant such a sum now I don't understand, he doesn't contribute anything at all, an hardly has for a long time now.

 

Would be happy if we got £6-7

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 16/12/2013 at 11:43, basjen said:

£15m for Cisse now would be worse than £35 for Carroll at the time imo. How on earth he could warrant such a sum now I don't understand, he doesn't contribute anything at all, an hardly has for a long time now.

 

Would be happy if we got £6-7

 

I wouldn't.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only place I think we'd have a slim chance of selling him would be to a German team, as they know him well from his time over there...

If any manager watched his playing time of recent they would be very hard  pushed to offer anything over 5 million, he really is that poor... As Ron quoted earlier his touch and perpetual offsides are ridiculous atm.

Maybee a swap and  some cash for Luuk de Jong (is that his name?), seems to be having a similar mare???

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Glad he scored and in that situation it was the right thing to do to give it to him to take, but generally, if Shola's on the pitch he must be the first in line and I have no idea why that's not the case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 26/12/2013 at 20:36, indi said:

Glad he scored and in that situation it was the right thing to do to give it to him to take, but generally, if Shola's on the pitch he must be the first in line and I have no idea why that's not the case.

 

It's happened two games in a row now, hmmm. My theory is that if the game is pretty much won then someone else takes the penalty but if it's a pressure situation then Shola steps up? s*** theory I know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...